Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Aerated irrigation significantly increased soil respiration rate by 15.38~17.87% compared with non-aerated irrigation.

A claim from The Effects of Aerated Irrigation on Soil Respiration and the Yield of the Maize Root Zone · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aerated irrigation significantly increased soil respiration rate by 15.38~17.87% compared with non-aerated irrigation.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
AI treatmente1
Outcome
soil respiration ratee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
15.38~17.87%e1
Comparator
CKe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“compared with CK, the AI treatment significantly increased the soil respiration rate and soil oxygen content (15.38~17.87% and 18.94~25.17%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1119
t0

“the Yield of the Maize Root Zone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–90

Title

The Effects of Aerated Irrigation on Soil Respiration and the Yield of the Maize Root Zone

Zhenzhen Yu; Chun Wang; Huafen Zou; et al. Sustainability 2022. doi:10.3390/su14084378

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-e95e85eaa275a56eccda2d4b70258ad9f67d1832557911c34ea2f6feb8500169 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

irrigation · soil: biology · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.