Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Addition of 50 and 100 mg kg−1 HA significantly increased shoot dry weight of maize by 20 and 23% relative to control.

A claim from EFFECT OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF LIGNITIC COAL DERIVED HUMIC ACID ON GROWTH OF MAIZE PLANTS · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Addition of 50 and 100 mg kg−1 HA significantly increased shoot dry weight of maize by 20 and 23% relative to control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
shoote1
Treatment
addition of 50 and 100 mg kg−1 HAe1
Outcome
dry weighte1
Direction
increasee1
Value
20 and 23%e1
Comparator
controle1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“MAIZE PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–88
e1

“The addition of 50 and 100 mg kg−1 HA caused significant increase of 20 and 23% in shoot and 39 and 32% in root dry weight of maize plants as compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 575–736

Title

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT LEVELS OF LIGNITIC COAL DERIVED HUMIC ACID ON GROWTH OF MAIZE PLANTS

M. Sharif; Riaz A. Khattak; M. S. Sarir Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 2002. doi:10.1081/css-120015906

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-e9fec36d165f36931efefbbe634f1eb638e1fb4db919ada23ec1a86e3865011c · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

other · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 164 positive, 20 negative or no effect

163 papers in the same direction as this claim · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative

175 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.