Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Profit under conventional tillage was 6.9% higher than under mulching systems.

A claim from RESPONSE OF MAIZE HYBRIDS TO TILLAGE SYSTEMS IN WESTERN UKRAINE · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Profit under conventional tillage was 6.9% higher than under mulching systems.

Treatment
conventional tillagee2
Outcome
profite2
Direction
highere2
Value
6.9%e2
Comparator
mulching systemse2
Setting
Western Ukrainee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“efficiency of growing new corn hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 108–146
e1

“Field trials were conducted in Western Ukraine on fields with sod-podzolic carbonate-gley soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 221–316
e2

“On average, all plots with conventional tillage had a profit of 43518 UAH/ha, which is 10.0% and 6.9% higher than in the variants with conservation tillage and mulching systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1872

Title

RESPONSE OF MAIZE HYBRIDS TO TILLAGE SYSTEMS IN WESTERN UKRAINE

Lviv branch of L. Pogorilyy UkrNDIPVT; V. Dumych; D. Bova; et al. Technical and technological aspects of development and testing of new machinery and technologies for agriculture of Ukraine 2023. doi:10.31473/2305-5987-2023-1-32(46)-14

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-ea12f742514cbfafb3309be3747e8ff84da8ef2808faa5a23bfb663399929ee4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 13 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.