Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Row spacing of 20.0 cm gave significantly higher wheat grain yield (4.85 t ha-1).

A claim from Performance of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties under different row spacing · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing of 20.0 cm gave significantly higher wheat grain yield (4.85 t ha-1).

Treatment
Row spacing of 20.0 centimetree5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
highere5
Value
4.85 t ha-1e5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Amongst row spacing growing of wheat at 20.0 centimetre row spacing recorded highest dry matter, Relative Growth Rate, Crop Growth Rate, Net Assimilation Rate, total number of tillers, number of effective tillers and test weight over other row spacing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1451
e5

“Row spacing of 20.0 centimetre gave significantly higher grain yield (4.85 t ha-1), straw yield (7.80 t ha-1 ), biological yield ( 12.65 t ha-1 ) where as harvest index was maximum under 22.5 centimetre row spacing (38.80)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1453–1675

Title

Performance of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties under different row spacing

Hansram Mali; Jagdish Choudhary Journal of Cereal Research 2012

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-eaf420ba0930f36f6aca12e2ec390b143794fdf0a25c36f04512267e4aef84f9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this claim · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

489 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.