Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The same treatment gave higher root length.

A claim from Effect of organics on seed yield and quality of green gram (Vigna radiata L.) · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment gave higher root length.

Treatment
Application of FYM (1/3)+ Vermicompost (1/3) + glyricidia leaf manure (1/3) equivalent to 100% RDP and foliar spray of panchagavya (3%) at flower initiation and 15 DAFe1
Outcome
root lengthe2
Direction
highere2
Value
18.25 cme2
Comparator
other treatment combinations and controle3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–58
e1

“Application of FYM (1/3)+ Vermicompost (1/3) + glyricidia leaf manure (1/3) equivalent to 100% RDP and foliar spray of panchagavya (3%) at flower initiation and 15 DAF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 431–598
e2

“recorded significantly more number of pods per plant (21.27), pod length (10.25 cm), number of seeds per pod (12.10), seed yield (12.89 g/plant) and seed yield (1263.68 kg/ha) with concomitant higher seed quality parameters like 100 seed weight (5.86 g), seed germination percentage (95.67 %), shoot length(16.53cm) root length (18.25 cm), seedling vigour index (3308) and protein content (23.79 %)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–997
e3

“as compared to other treatment combinations and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 998–1053

Title

Effect of organics on seed yield and quality of green gram (Vigna radiata L.)

A. Fazulla Shariff; Ashok S. Sajjan; H.B. Babalad; et al. Legume Research - An International Journal 2016. doi:10.18805/lr.v0i0f.11297

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-ebf738035a24abe7d2b9bc4868b8a75bcc3ab3884c44ee4d571e158443295dd2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

stage · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

application · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

98 papers: 94 positive, 4 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

89 papers more in this group

See all 98 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

136 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.