Intervention effectmodel-written summary

USG in raised beds saved forty percent of irrigation water versus conventional prilled urea.

A claim from Utilization of Urea Super Granule in Raised Bed Versus Prilled Urea in Conventional Flat Method for Transplanted Aman Rice (Oryza Sativa) · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USG in raised beds saved forty percent of irrigation water versus conventional prilled urea.

Treatment
USG in bed plantinge0
Outcome
irrigation watere0
Direction
savede0
Value
Forty percente0
Comparator
PU broadcasting in conventional methode0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Forty percent irrigation water and time for application could be saved through the USG in bed planting than the PU broadcasting in conventional method.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–1008
t0

“Rice (Oryza Sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–137

Title

Utilization of Urea Super Granule in Raised Bed Versus Prilled Urea in Conventional Flat Method for Transplanted Aman Rice (Oryza Sativa)

Md. Halim Mahmud Bhuyan American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 2016. doi:10.11648/j.ajaf.20160401.11

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-ed0b3f5671f7da2ffdce3e4a79d83ca65ee9f18b42627647cc42f8e5f8340d64 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 29 positive, 5 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Thirty-nine percent of irrigation water and application time could be saved through foliar nitrogen spray in bed planting compared with the conventional method.

    Foliar Spray of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Raised Bed Increases Yield of Transplanted Aman Rice over Conventional Method · 2012 · compared with conventional method

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. no effect
    Increased nitrogen availability caused no decrease in turgor pressure in rice endosperm cells.

    Multiple strategies for heat adaptation to prevent chalkiness in the rice endosperm · 2018

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Increasing nitrogen rate increased water consumption.

    Microbial Activity in Paddy Soil and Water-Use Efficiency of Rice as Affected by Irrigation Method and Nitrogen Level · 2015

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Higher nitrogen supply reduced leaf intrinsic water use efficiency.

    Effects of contrasting N supplies on leaf photosynthetic induction under fluctuating light in rice (Oryza sativa L.) · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Organic nitrogen sources did not significantly influence water uptake and solid loss.

    Effect of different organic sources of nitrogen on yield and quality of kharif rice (Oryza sativa L.) · 2019

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Water uptake ratio during the cooking quality test did not differ between high and standard protein rice.

    Characteristics of Cracked Grains after Soaking and Water Absorption of the High Protein Low Amylose Content Rice "Kiraho" · 2021 · compared with standard protein low amylose content rice

    No difference from an alternative

  7. positive
    N application increased total water uptake in upland rice and maize.

    Characteristics of root growth and water uptake from soil in upland rice and maize under water stress · 2000

    Same direction

  8. positive
    The combined nitrogen and weed-control treatment produced water productivity of 0.60 kg m−3.

    Effect of nitrogen rates and weed control methods on weeds abundance and yield of direct-seeded rice · 2011

    Same direction

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

tillage · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 40 positive, 4 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Thirty-nine percent of irrigation water and application time could be saved through foliar nitrogen spray in bed planting compared with the conventional method.

    Foliar Spray of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Raised Bed Increases Yield of Transplanted Aman Rice over Conventional Method · 2012 · compared with conventional method

    Same directionCited by this paper

  2. positive
    Bed planting saved about 42% of irrigation water and application time.

    Yield and Growth Response to Transplanted Aman Rice under Raised Bed over Conventional Cultivation Method · 2012

    Same directionCited by this paper

  3. negative
    No-tillage decreased soil water retention.

    Effects of Continuous No-Tillage on Crop Yield and Soil Fertility in Double Rice Cropping System · 2010

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Puddle transplanting required 35-40 % more irrigation water than no tillage direct seeding.

    Variation in Productivity and Energy Use in Rice-Wheat System under Different Establishment Methods · 2017 · compared with no tillage direct seeded rice

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    AWD until flowering and grain filling had no significant difference in yield and CWP.

    GRAIN YIELD PERFORMANCE OF UPLAND AND LOWLAND RICE VARIETIES UNDER WATER SAVING IRRIGATION THROUGH ALTERNATE WETTING AND DRYING IN SANDY CLAY LOAMS OF SOUTHERN MALAWI · 2014 · compared with grain filling

    No difference from an alternative

  6. no effect
    Raised beds for puddle transplanted rice do not save irrigation water under similar full furrow irrigation schedules.

    Irrigation water productivity of rice grown with resource conservation technologies · 2010 · compared with direct seeded rice (DSR)

    No difference from an alternative

  7. positive
    Raised-bed direct seeding saved 13 to 23% irrigation water relative to puddled transplanting.

    Saving of Water and Labor in a Rice–Wheat System with No‐Tillage and Direct Seeding Technologies · 2007 · compared with conventional puddled transplanting

    Same direction

  8. positive
    CA + practices saved 45.8% irrigation water in rice compared with CA with flood irrigation.

    Re-designing irrigated intensive cereal systems through bundling precision agronomic innovations for transitioning towards agricultural sustainability in North-West India · 2019 · compared with CA with flood irrigation

    Same direction

35 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.