Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The benefit of the added amendments on straw yield was more obvious under drainage-water irrigation, with the highest relative straw yield increase under drainage water.

A claim from EFFICIENCY OF SOME AMENDMENTS ADDED TO CLAYEY SOIL |RR!GATED WITH DRAINAGE WATER · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit of the added amendments on straw yield was more obvious under drainage-water irrigation, with the highest relative straw yield increase under drainage water.

Treatment
added amendmentse3
Outcome
relative yield (%) of straw yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Comparator
Nile watere1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Wheat grains yield and wheat straw yield significantly decreased because of irrigation with drainage water, but application of any experimental amendment significantly increased them in comparing with the control (not-amended) under irrigation with drainage or Nile water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–696
e3

“The beneficial effect of the added amendments was more obvious on straw yield irrigated with drainage water, whereas increasing in relative yield (%) of straw yield was the highest under irrigation with drainage water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–971

Title

EFFICIENCY OF SOME AMENDMENTS ADDED TO CLAYEY SOIL |RR!GATED WITH DRAINAGE WATER

T.A. Abou El-Defan; I.M.M. El-Banna; T.A. EI-Maghraby; et al. Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering 2005. doi:10.21608/jssae.2005.235743

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-ef1bfb248c33d2ceb18bd6fe7d0c9bbeb2aba9edfc84d10894598bf6fd61c659 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

other · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

223 papers: 206 positive, 17 negative or no effect

205 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

214 papers more in this group

See all 223 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.