Claim · model-written summary
Crop growth rate and relative growth rate were higher with two irrigations.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- two irrigation levelse0
- Outcome
- crop growth rate and relative growth ratee0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Wheat”
e0“The growth indices i.e. crop growth rate and relative growth rate are significantly higher in BP, two irrigation levels and M3 during 2019-20 and 2020-21, respectively”
Title
Nasir Ahmad Qazizadah; Bhagat Singh; Anil Kumar Dhaka; et al. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 2022. doi:10.9734/ijpss/2022/v34i2231509
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect Establishment methods did not significantly influence time to booting, heading or maturity.
- Intervention effect Two irrigations delayed booting, heading and maturity relative to one irrigation.
- Intervention effect M3 significantly delayed booting, heading and maturity relative to M0.
- Intervention effect Crop growth rate and relative growth rate were higher with bed planting.
- Intervention effect Crop growth rate and relative growth rate were higher with M3.
- Intervention effect Bed planting gave maximum grain yield versus zero and conventional tillage.
- Intervention effect Two irrigations increased grain yield versus one.
- Intervention effect M3 increased grain yield versus other treatments.