Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Average grain yield of wheat with pinoxaden (4.9 t/ha) was statistically at par with sulfosulfuron at 24.5 g/ha (4.76 t/ha).

A claim from Chemical weed management to increase productivity of wheat · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Average grain yield of wheat with pinoxaden (4.9 t/ha) was statistically at par with sulfosulfuron at 24.5 g/ha (4.76 t/ha).

Treatment
Pinoxaden 50 g/hae0
Outcome
average grain yielde0
Direction
at pare1
Value
4.9 t/hae0
Qualifier
4.76 t/hae1
Comparator
sulfosulfuron 24.5 g/hae1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pinoxaden 50 g/ha produced higher average grain yield (4.9 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–597
e1

“statistically at par with clodinafop 60 g/ha (4.80 t/ha), sulfosulfuron 24.5 g/ha (4.76 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 609–702
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–58

Title

Chemical weed management to increase productivity of wheat

Balkaran Singh Sandhu; Nirmaljit Singh Dhaliwal Indian Journal of Weed Science 2016. doi:10.5958/0974-8164.2016.00099.x

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-f99004d39393634826371586b1b05feb50fb5df15a6e83f5970e83ca1584cca9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

pinoxaden · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.