Abstract
Pinoxaden 50 g/ha reduced P. minor weeds, significantly which was statistically at par with clodinafop 60 g/ha, sulfosulfuron 24.5 g/ha but significantly superior over pendimethalin 750 g/ha, isoproturon 937 g/ha. Numbers of effective tillers/m2 were higher among pinoxaden, clodinafop and sulfosulfuron treatment from the isoproturon, pendimethalin and unweeded check. All other herbicide treatments failed to produce any significant effect on the plant height, ear length, number of grains/ear and 1000-grain weight of wheat crop. Pinoxaden 50 g/ha produced higher average grain yield (4.9 t/ha), which was statistically at par with clodinafop 60 g/ha (4.80 t/ha), sulfosulfuron 24.5 g/ha (4.76 t/ha) but significant superior from the isoproturon 937 g/ha (4.52 t/ha), pendimethalin 750 g/ha (4.18 t/ha) and unweeded check (3.98 t/ha). The increase in yield was due to less weed competition among these treatments. Benifit: cost ratio was higher in case of clodinafop (1.83:1) followed by pinoxaden (1.82:1), sulfosulfuron (1.82:1) and isoproturon (1.70:1) and pendimethalin (1.46:1) but lower B:C ratio was obtained with unweeded check (1.45:1).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Pinoxaden at 50 g/ha significantly reduced Phalaris minor weeds in wheat.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Pinoxaden 50 g/hae0
- Interactor
- P. minore0weed
- Outcome
- P. minor weedse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pinoxaden 50 g/ha reduced P. minor weeds, significantly”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The weed reduction by pinoxaden was statistically at par with clodinafop at 60 g/ha and sulfosulfuron at 24.5 g/ha.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Pinoxaden 50 g/hae0
- Interactor
- P. minore0weed
- Outcome
- P. minor weedse0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Comparator
- clodinafop 60 g/ha, sulfosulfuron 24.5 g/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pinoxaden 50 g/ha reduced P. minor weeds, significantly which was statistically at par with clodinafop 60 g/ha, sulfosulfuron 24.5 g/ha”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Pinoxaden at 50 g/ha reduced P. minor weeds significantly more than pendimethalin at 750 g/ha and isoproturon at 937 g/ha.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Pinoxaden 50 g/hae0
- Interactor
- P. minore0weed
- Outcome
- P. minor weedse0
- Direction
- significantly superiore0
- Comparator
- pendimethalin 750 g/ha, isoproturon 937 g/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pinoxaden 50 g/ha reduced P. minor weeds, significantly which was statistically at par with clodinafop 60 g/ha, sulfosulfuron 24.5 g/ha but significantly superior over pendimethalin 750 g/ha, isoproturon 937 g/ha”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The number of effective tillers per m2 was higher with pinoxaden, clodinafop and sulfosulfuron than with isoproturon, pendimethalin and the unweeded check.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- pinoxaden, clodinafop and sulfosulfurone0
- Outcome
- Numbers of effective tillers/m2e0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- isoproturon, pendimethalin and unweeded checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Numbers of effective tillers/m2 were higher among pinoxaden, clodinafop and sulfosulfuron treatment from the isoproturon, pendimethalin and unweeded check”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
All other herbicide treatments failed to produce any significant effect on plant height and ear length of wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- All other herbicide treatmentse0
- Outcome
- plant height, ear lengthe0
- Direction
- failed to produce any significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All other herbicide treatments failed to produce any significant effect on the plant height, ear length, number of grains/ear and 1000-grain weight of wheat crop”
Claim · model-written summary
All other herbicide treatments failed to produce any significant effect on number of grains per ear and 1000-grain weight of wheat.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- All other herbicide treatmentse0
- Outcome
- number of grains/ear and 1000-grain weighte0
- Direction
- failed to produce any significant effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All other herbicide treatments failed to produce any significant effect on the plant height, ear length, number of grains/ear and 1000-grain weight of wheat crop”
Claim · model-written summary
Average grain yield of wheat with pinoxaden (4.9 t/ha) was statistically at par with clodinafop at 60 g/ha (4.80 t/ha).
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Pinoxaden 50 g/hae0
- Outcome
- average grain yielde0
- Direction
- at pare1
- Value
- 4.9 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 4.80 t/hae1
- Comparator
- clodinafop 60 g/hae1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pinoxaden 50 g/ha produced higher average grain yield (4.9 t/ha)”
e1“statistically at par with clodinafop 60 g/ha (4.80 t/ha)”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Average grain yield of wheat with pinoxaden (4.9 t/ha) was statistically at par with sulfosulfuron at 24.5 g/ha (4.76 t/ha).
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Pinoxaden 50 g/hae0
- Outcome
- average grain yielde0
- Direction
- at pare1
- Value
- 4.9 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 4.76 t/hae1
- Comparator
- sulfosulfuron 24.5 g/hae1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pinoxaden 50 g/ha produced higher average grain yield (4.9 t/ha)”
e1“statistically at par with clodinafop 60 g/ha (4.80 t/ha), sulfosulfuron 24.5 g/ha (4.76 t/ha)”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Average grain yield of wheat with pinoxaden (4.9 t/ha) was significantly superior to isoproturon at 937 g/ha (4.52 t/ha).
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Pinoxaden 50 g/hae0
- Outcome
- average grain yielde0
- Direction
- significant superiore1
- Value
- 4.9 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 4.52 t/hae1
- Comparator
- isoproturon 937 g/hae1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pinoxaden 50 g/ha produced higher average grain yield (4.9 t/ha)”
e1“significant superior from the isoproturon 937 g/ha (4.52 t/ha)”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Average grain yield of wheat with pinoxaden (4.9 t/ha) was significantly superior to pendimethalin at 750 g/ha (4.18 t/ha).
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Pinoxaden 50 g/hae0
- Outcome
- average grain yielde0
- Direction
- significant superiore1
- Value
- 4.9 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 4.18 t/hae1
- Comparator
- pendimethalin 750 g/hae1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pinoxaden 50 g/ha produced higher average grain yield (4.9 t/ha)”
e1“significant superior from the isoproturon 937 g/ha (4.52 t/ha), pendimethalin 750 g/ha (4.18 t/ha)”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Average grain yield of wheat with pinoxaden (4.9 t/ha) was significantly superior to the unweeded check (3.98 t/ha).
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Pinoxaden 50 g/hae0
- Outcome
- average grain yielde0
- Direction
- significant superiore1
- Value
- 4.9 t/hae0
- Qualifier
- 3.98 t/hae1
- Comparator
- unweeded checke1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Pinoxaden 50 g/ha produced higher average grain yield (4.9 t/ha)”
e1“significant superior from the isoproturon 937 g/ha (4.52 t/ha), pendimethalin 750 g/ha (4.18 t/ha) and unweeded check (3.98 t/ha)”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors attribute the yield increase in the better herbicide treatments to less weed competition.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Interactor
- weede0weed
- Outcome
- increase in yielde0
- Qualifier
- less weed competitione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The increase in yield was due to less weed competition among these treatments”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The benefit:cost ratio was higher with clodinafop (1.83:1).
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- clodinafope1
- Outcome
- Benifit: cost ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.83:1e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Benifit: cost ratio was higher”
e1“clodinafop (1.83:1)”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The benefit:cost ratio with pinoxaden was 1.82:1.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- pinoxadene1
- Outcome
- Benifit: cost ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.82:1e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Benifit: cost ratio was higher”
e1“pinoxaden (1.82:1)”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The benefit:cost ratio with sulfosulfuron was 1.82:1.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- sulfosulfurone1
- Outcome
- Benifit: cost ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.82:1e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Benifit: cost ratio was higher”
e1“sulfosulfuron (1.82:1)”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The benefit:cost ratio with isoproturon was 1.70:1.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- isoproturone1
- Outcome
- Benifit: cost ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.70:1e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Benifit: cost ratio was higher”
e1“isoproturon (1.70:1)”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The benefit:cost ratio with pendimethalin was 1.46:1.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- pendimethaline1
- Outcome
- Benifit: cost ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.46:1e1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Benifit: cost ratio was higher”
e1“pendimethalin (1.46:1)”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
The unweeded check had the lowest benefit:cost ratio, 1.45:1.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Outcome
- B:C ratioe0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 1.45:1e0
- Qualifier
- unweeded checke0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lower B:C ratio was obtained with unweeded check (1.45:1)”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
pinoxaden · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →pendimethalin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
62 papers more in this group
See all 66 papers →isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
74 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
85 papers more in this group
See all 89 papers →pinoxaden · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →clodinafop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
56 papers more in this group
See all 60 papers →herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 466 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
559 papers more in this group
See all 563 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.