Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nutrient uptake was higher with nano DAP sprayed at two stages.

A claim from Performance of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under different levels of granular fertilizers and nano fertilizers · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient uptake was higher with nano DAP sprayed at two stages.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
foliar spray of nano DAP at two stagese0
Outcome
Nutrient uptakee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nutrient uptake was higher with RPP among fertilizer levels and higher with foliar spray of nano DAP at two stages.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1614
t0

“sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 15–47

Title

Performance of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under different levels of granular fertilizers and nano fertilizers

V Hemanth Kumar; Shivamurthy D; Aravinda Kumar BN; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2025. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2025.v8.i2a.2528

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-f9a97d6654ab5a19dfaefb8c9a8ceb97ae9c7e0f89aebfaa43c42a0af4ac8002 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

application · nutrient: content · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.