Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Foliar potassium had no effect on cotton yield.

A claim from Skip‐Row Planting Is Potentially Beneficial in Rainfed Cotton · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar potassium had no effect on cotton yield.

Treatment
Foliar K applicatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar K application had no effect on yield or quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–982
t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–61

Title

Skip‐Row Planting Is Potentially Beneficial in Rainfed Cotton

CSA News 2024. doi:10.1002/csan.21230

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-fa3c5376ccd778fb39ab30fc0da71199143cfd556b98f4358b6ea91777c5f6be · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

potassium · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ

97 papers: 86 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim · 86 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    K deficiency reduced seed mass by 4%

    Genotypic Interactions with Potassium and Nitrogen in Cotton of Varied Maturity · 1996 · compared with 112 kg ha −1 K

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

88 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

application · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 253 positive, 30 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 253 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

274 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.