Claim · model-written summary
Surface liming increased soybean yield by 36%, regardless of MAP and elemental S.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe3 - Treatment
- Surface liminge3
- Outcome
- soybean yielde3
- Direction
- increasee3
- Value
- 36%e3
- Comparator
- control (no amendments)e2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Surface liming resulted in a 36% increase in soybean yield, regardless of the use of MAP and elemental S”
e2“Treatments consisted of a control (no amendments), surface lime (SL), SL + MAP and SL + MAP + elemental S”
Title
Vanderson Modolon Duart; Eduardo Fávero Caires; Grazielle Schornobai; et al. Soil Use and Management 2024. doi:10.1111/sum.13132
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Surface lime increased soil pH.
- Intervention effect Surface lime increased exchangeable Ca and Mg contents and base saturation.
- Intervention effect Surface lime reduced Al3+ content and Al3+ saturation throughout the soil profile.
- Observation Liming effects were more pronounced in the 0-10 cm layer than in the 10-100 cm layers.
- Intervention effect Adding MAP or MAP + elemental S did not improve the effectiveness of surface liming in alleviating soil acidity.
- Observation Root length per soil surface area to 100 cm showed a strong correlation with wheat yield.
- Observation Root length per soil surface area to 100 cm was not correlated with soybean yield.
- Intervention effect Surface liming increased wheat yield by 40%.
- Intervention effect Lime combined with MAP and elemental S increased wheat yield by 74%.
- Intervention effect Wheat showed a greater yield response to P and S fertilizer than soybean.
- Intervention effect Surface liming had a more favourable impact on wheat root growth than on soybean root growth.
- Mechanism Wheat was more affected than soybean by insufficient rainfall, which is suggested to explain its greater root response.