Intervention effectmodel-written summary

All Zn fertilization treatments increased shoot dry matter by more than 50% at the 10-leaf stage.

A claim from Response of Transplanted Oilseed Rape to Zinc Placement and Root Pruning · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All Zn fertilization treatments increased shoot dry matter by more than 50% at the 10-leaf stage.

Taxon
oilseed rapeBrassica napuse0
Organ / stage
10-leaf stagee1
Treatment
Zn fertilization treatmentse1
Outcome
shoot dry mattere1
Direction
increasee1
Value
>50%e1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In a glasshouse study, the response of oilseed rape seedlings to post-transplanting Zn supply and to root pruning was examined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 276–402
e1

“All Zn fertilization treatments resulted in a large increase (>50%) in shoot dry matter at 10-leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1323

Title

Response of Transplanted Oilseed Rape to Zinc Placement and Root Pruning

R. W. Bell; Z. G. Lu; J. Li; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2004. doi:10.1081/pln-120028871

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-fb0f3a930af5318eed06486e5e6707731c506ae0d378bb4b6525d7e384fc4fe2 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 12 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 89 positive, 17 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

97 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.