Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Applying only 75% of the recommended NPK fertilizers, with common or water soluble fertilizers through fertigation, did not significantly reduce onion bulb yield.

A claim from Effect of Microsprinkler Fertigation on Growth and Yield of Rabi Onion · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying only 75% of the recommended NPK fertilizers, with common or water soluble fertilizers through fertigation, did not significantly reduce onion bulb yield.

Taxon
onionAllium cepae1
Treatment
75% of the recommended NPK fertilizerse4
Outcome
bulb yielde4
Direction
did not significantly decreasee4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa
Allium cepa · TaxonMehdi · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“onion cv. Arka Niketan as influenced by microsprinkler fertigation using different sources and levels of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–257
e4

“bulb yield did not significantly decrease by applying just 75% of the recommended NPK fertilizers, using common or water soluble fertilizers supplied through fertigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–844

Title

Effect of Microsprinkler Fertigation on Growth and Yield of Rabi Onion

M Prabhakar; S S Hebbar; A K Nair Journal of Horticultural Sciences 2011. doi:10.24154/jhs.v6i1.446

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-fd37ef8b694e39750a25a9f1fb35e0e35f2b865f7f55a3aa4a4a467e70bf23d6 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this claim · 464 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

521 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.