Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Inoculation increased root surface potential nitrogenase activity by 4.9 times.

A claim from EFFICACY OF THE ASSOCIATION “SPRING WHEAT – AZOSPIRILLUM BRАZILENSE B-7318” · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation increased root surface potential nitrogenase activity by 4.9 times.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
inoculated plantse0
Outcome
potential nitrogenase activity on the washed rootse0
Direction
exceedede0
Value
4.9 timese0
Comparator
control variante0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potential nitrogenase activity on the washed roots of inoculated plants significantly (by 4.9 times) exceeded this parameter in the rhizoplane of plants of the control variant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1282
e1

“azospirilla provided a significant increase in the length of the ear (by 8.1 %), the number of grains in the ear (by 4.1 %), the mass of grains from the ear (by 14.8 %) and the weight of 1,000 grains (by 6.1 %), as well as an increase in yield by 15.7 % compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1648–1925
t0

“SPRING WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–41

Title

EFFICACY OF THE ASSOCIATION “SPRING WHEAT – AZOSPIRILLUM BRАZILENSE B-7318”

Yu. O. Vorobei; O. O. Shakhovnina; O. V. Lohosha; et al. Agriciltural microbiology 2023. doi:10.35868/1997-3004.37.48-60

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-fea27cfcd76d67bd6e3e9a583176a750a53fa486f13ccb1d33bf8dd669794928 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

inoculation · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 29 positive, 2 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.