Cuphea lanceolata 59 claims

species · family Lythraceae · green plant · NCBI Taxonomy ↗

Also written in claims: C. lanceolata × C. viscosissima

8 spellings

Cuphea lanceolata
Cuphea lanceolataHectonichus · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Honey bees increased C. lanceolata seed production over the no-pollinator check to 40.9 g versus 9.8 g.

Taxon
C. lanceolataCuphea lanceolatae0
Treatment
honey beee0
Interactor
honey beeApis melliferae0pollinator
Outcome
seed producede0
Direction
moree0
Value
40.9 ge0
Qualifier
9.8 ge0
Comparator
no-pollinator checke0

Verbatim

e0

“the honey bee was an efficient pollinator of C. lanceolata with significantly more seed produced (40.9 g) than the no-pollinator check (9.8 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–891

Title

Cuphea lanceolata and Cuphea ignia Seed Increase Using Three Pollinators in Insect-Proof Cages in the Field

Craig A. Abel; J. W. Van Roekel; Richard L. Wilson Southwestern Entomologist 2019. doi:10.3958/059.044.0110

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C. lanceolata seed production with honey bees did not differ significantly from bumble bees.

Taxon
C. lanceolataCuphea lanceolatae0
Treatment
honey beee0
Interactor
honey beeApis melliferae0pollinator
Second interactor
bumble beee0pollinator
Outcome
seed producede0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Qualifier
20.7 ge0
Comparator
bumble beee0

Verbatim

e0

“the honey bee was an efficient pollinator of C. lanceolata with significantly more seed produced (40.9 g) than the no-pollinator check (9.8 g). The honey bee was not significantly different than the bumble bee (20.7 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–967
t0

“Cuphea lanceolata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17

Title

Cuphea lanceolata and Cuphea ignia Seed Increase Using Three Pollinators in Insect-Proof Cages in the Field

Craig A. Abel; J. W. Van Roekel; Richard L. Wilson Southwestern Entomologist 2019. doi:10.3958/059.044.0110

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

C. lanceolata seed production with honey bees did not differ significantly from O. cornifrons.

Taxon
C. lanceolataCuphea lanceolatae0
Treatment
honey beee0
Interactor
honey beeApis melliferae0pollinator
Second interactor
O. cornifronsOsmia cornifronse0pollinator
Outcome
seed producede0
Direction
not significantly differente0
Qualifier
25.6 ge0
Comparator
O. cornifronse0

Verbatim

e0

“the honey bee was an efficient pollinator of C. lanceolata with significantly more seed produced (40.9 g) than the no-pollinator check (9.8 g). The honey bee was not significantly different than the bumble bee (20.7 g) or O. cornifrons (25.6 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–993
t0

“Cuphea lanceolata”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–17

Title

Cuphea lanceolata and Cuphea ignia Seed Increase Using Three Pollinators in Insect-Proof Cages in the Field

Craig A. Abel; J. W. Van Roekel; Richard L. Wilson Southwestern Entomologist 2019. doi:10.3958/059.044.0110

Other claims from this paper (4)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 3-MPAN increased cuphea fresh and dry weight.

Taxon
Cuphea lanceolata L.Cuphea lanceolatae1
Treatment
3-MPANe0
Outcome
fresh and dry weightse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“3-MPAN increased the fresh and dry weights of all four species tested.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–741
e1

“cuphea ( Cuphea lanceolata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–593

Title

Stimulation of Plant Growth by (3-Methoxyphenyl)acetonitile Applied as a Foliar Spray In Vivo or as a Medium Amendment In Vitro

Steven F. Vaughn; Mark A. Berhow; Brent Tisserat HortScience 2008. doi:10.21273/hortsci.43.2.372

Other claims from this paper (7)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inbreeding decreased plant height, biomass and seed yield

Taxon
Cuphea lanceolataCuphea lanceolatae0
Material
LN‐43e2
Treatment
inbreedinge1
Outcome
plant height, biomass, seed yielde1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
S 0 population (LN‐43)e2

Verbatim

e0

“Cuphea lanceolata forma silenoides Ait.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39
e1

“Plant height, biomass, seed yield, seed oil content, and 500‐seed weight decreased as inbreeding increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–816
e2

“estimate inbreeding effects by using differences between an S 0 population (LN‐43) and S 1 and S 2 lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–327

Title

Heterosis of Cuphea lanceolata Single‐Cross Hybrids

M. Shajahan Ali; Steven J. Knapp Crop Science 1996. doi:10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183x003600020011x

Other claims from this paper (15)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inbreeding decreased seed oil content and 500-seed weight

Taxon
Cuphea lanceolataCuphea lanceolatae0
Treatment
inbreedinge1
Outcome
seed oil content, and 500‐seed weighte1
Direction
decreasede1
Comparator
S 0 population (LN‐43)e2

Verbatim

e0

“Cuphea lanceolata forma silenoides Ait.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39
e1

“Plant height, biomass, seed yield, seed oil content, and 500‐seed weight decreased as inbreeding increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–816
e2

“estimate inbreeding effects by using differences between an S 0 population (LN‐43) and S 1 and S 2 lines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–327

Title

Heterosis of Cuphea lanceolata Single‐Cross Hybrids

M. Shajahan Ali; Steven J. Knapp Crop Science 1996. doi:10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183x003600020011x

Other claims from this paper (15)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biomass and seed yield were more severely affected by inbreeding than the other traits

Taxon
Cuphea lanceolataCuphea lanceolatae0
Treatment
inbreedinge3
Outcome
Biomass and seed yielde3
Direction
more severely affectede3
Comparator
the other traitse3

Verbatim

e0

“Cuphea lanceolata forma silenoides Ait.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39
e3

“Biomass and seed yield were more severely affected by inbreeding than the other traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 882–968

Title

Heterosis of Cuphea lanceolata Single‐Cross Hybrids

M. Shajahan Ali; Steven J. Knapp Crop Science 1996. doi:10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183x003600020011x

Other claims from this paper (15)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Significant inbreeding depression was observed for every trait

Taxon
Cuphea lanceolataCuphea lanceolatae0
Treatment
inbreedinge4
Outcome
inbreeding depressione4

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Cuphea lanceolata forma silenoides Ait.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39
e4

“Significant inbreeding depression was observed for every trait”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–880

Title

Heterosis of Cuphea lanceolata Single‐Cross Hybrids

M. Shajahan Ali; Steven J. Knapp Crop Science 1996. doi:10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183x003600020011x

Other claims from this paper (15)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Single-cross hybrids showed significant heterosis over inbreds for every hybrid and trait

Taxon
Cuphea lanceolataCuphea lanceolatae0
Treatment
single‐cross hybridse2
Outcome
heterosise1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Comparator
inbredse3

Verbatim

e0

“Cuphea lanceolata forma silenoides Ait.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39
e1

“Significant heterosis was observed for every hybrid and trait”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1031
e2

“All possible single‐cross hybrids were developed among five S 5 lines from LN‐43”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–708
e3

“estimate heterosis effects by using differences between inbreds and single‐cross hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–417

Title

Heterosis of Cuphea lanceolata Single‐Cross Hybrids

M. Shajahan Ali; Steven J. Knapp Crop Science 1996. doi:10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183x003600020011x

Other claims from this paper (15)
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean heterosis of single-cross hybrids over inbreds was 71.7% for plant height

Taxon
Cuphea lanceolataCuphea lanceolatae0
Treatment
single‐cross hybridse1
Outcome
plant heighte3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
71.7%e3
Comparator
inbredse2

Verbatim

e0

“Cuphea lanceolata forma silenoides Ait.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–39
e1

“All possible single‐cross hybrids were developed among five S 5 lines from LN‐43”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–708
e2

“estimate heterosis effects by using differences between inbreds and single‐cross hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 329–417
e3

“Mean heterosis was 71.7% for plant height, 79.9% for biomass, 159.0% for seed yield, 36.7% for seed oil content, and 22.3% for 500‐seed weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1244

Title

Heterosis of Cuphea lanceolata Single‐Cross Hybrids

M. Shajahan Ali; Steven J. Knapp Crop Science 1996. doi:10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183x003600020011x

Other claims from this paper (15)