Paper · 1982 · Journal of Animal Science

Effect of Ammoniation on the Refermentation of Corn Silage

M. J. Glewen; A. W. Young

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of anhydrous ammonia on the refermentation of corn silage exposed to air were determined by measuring fermentation in a series of silage filled boxes over a 7-d period. Applications of anhydrous ammonia at 1% of dry matter at time of ensiling enhanced stability of corn silage following aeration. Temperature of untreated silage increased 75% during the first 4 d of refermentation and reached a higher (P<.05) maximum temperature than the ammoniated silage (48.0 vs 20.8 C). Ammoniated silage did not increase in temperature during the 7-d period. Mean dry matter loss was less (P<.05) for the treated silage. Untreated silage pH increased (P<.05) from 3.75 to 5.51 while pH of treated silage remained nearly constant. Lactic acid levels were higher initially (P<.05) in the ammoniated silage and changed little during refermentation. However, lactic acid levels decreased by 75% in the untreated silage by d 7 and were still lower (P<.05) in comparison to treated silage. Acetic and propionic acid levels in the untreated silage increased by 138 and 78%, respectively and were higher (P<.05) in comparison to treated silage on d 7. Although neither silage showed large changes in ammonia N, increases (P<.05) in acid detergent insoluble N were observed in the untreated silage toward the end of the refermentation period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonia treatment improved corn silage stability after aeration.

Treatment
anhydrous ammonia at 1% of dry mattere0
Outcome
stability of corn silagee0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Applications of anhydrous ammonia at 1% of dry matter at time of ensiling enhanced stability of corn silage following aeration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 181–308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated silage temperature rose 75% over four days and reached a higher maximum than ammoniated silage.

Treatment
ammoniated silagee0
Outcome
maximum temperaturee0
Direction
highere0
Value
48.0 vs 20.8 Ce0
Qualifier
75% during the first 4 de0
Comparator
untreated silagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Temperature of untreated silage increased 75% during the first 4 d of refermentation and reached a higher (P<.05) maximum temperature than the ammoniated silage (48.0 vs 20.8 C).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammoniated silage temperature did not rise during seven days.

Outcome
temperaturee0
Direction
did not increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammoniated silage did not increase in temperature during the 7-d period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–560 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammoniated silage had less mean dry matter loss than untreated silage.

Treatment
treated silagee0
Outcome
Mean dry matter losse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
untreated silagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mean dry matter loss was less (P<.05) for the treated silage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–622 · show in text ↑
e1

“Temperature of untreated silage increased 75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–354 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated silage pH rose from 3.75 to 5.51 while treated silage pH stayed nearly constant.

Treatment
treated silagee0
Outcome
pHe0
Direction
remained nearly constante0
Qualifier
from 3.75 to 5.51e0
Comparator
Untreated silagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Untreated silage pH increased (P<.05) from 3.75 to 5.51 while pH of treated silage remained nearly constant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–731 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammoniated silage initially had higher lactic acid levels than untreated silage.

Treatment
ammoniated silagee0
Outcome
Lactic acid levelse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
untreated silagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lactic acid levels were higher initially (P<.05) in the ammoniated silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–805 · show in text ↑
e1

“Temperature of untreated silage increased 75%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–354 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lactic acid changed little during refermentation in ammoniated silage.

Treatment
ammoniated silagee0
Outcome
Lactic acid levelse0
Direction
changed littlee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lactic acid levels were higher initially (P<.05) in the ammoniated silage and changed little during refermentation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 732–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated silage lactic acid fell by 75% by day seven and remained below treated silage.

Treatment
treated silagee0
Outcome
lactic acid levelse0
Direction
lowere0
Value
75%e0
Comparator
untreated silagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lactic acid levels decreased by 75% in the untreated silage by d 7 and were still lower (P<.05) in comparison to treated silage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 857–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated silage acetic acid increased 138% and exceeded treated silage at day seven.

Treatment
treated silagee0
Outcome
Acetic and propionic acid levelse0
Direction
highere0
Value
138e0
Comparator
untreated silagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetic and propionic acid levels in the untreated silage increased by 138 and 78%, respectively and were higher (P<.05) in comparison to treated silage on d 7.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–58 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Untreated silage propionic acid increased 78% and exceeded treated silage at day seven.

Treatment
treated silagee0
Outcome
propionic acid levelse0
Direction
highere0
Value
78%e0
Comparator
untreated silagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Acetic and propionic acid levels in the untreated silage increased by 138 and 78%, respectively and were higher (P<.05) in comparison to treated silage on d 7.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 986–1145 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither silage had large changes in ammonia nitrogen.

Outcome
ammonia Ne0
Direction
neither silage showed large changese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neither silage showed large changes in ammonia N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1155–1203 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–58 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid detergent insoluble nitrogen rose significantly in untreated silage late in refermentation.

Outcome
acid detergent insoluble Ne0
Direction
increasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increases (P<.05) in acid detergent insoluble N were observed in the untreated silage toward the end of the refermentation period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1335 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn Silage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–58 · show in text ↑

ammonia · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

processing · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

processing · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

processing · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 27 positive, 13 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

processing · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 40 positive, 33 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.