Paper · 1999 · Arboriculture & Urban Forestry

Greenhouse and Field Growth of Northern Red Oak Seedlings Inside Different Types of Treeshelters

William E. Sharpe; Bryan R. Swistock; Kelly A. Mecum; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Greenhouse and field experiments were used to measure growth and survival of northern red oak seedlings ( Quercus rubra L.) inside brown translucent, clear acrylic, and woven wire treeshelters compared to the growth and survival of unsheltered seedlings. In the greenhouse, seedlings grown in brown plastic and clear acrylic shelters had significantly reduced stem, leaf, and root development compared to unsheltered seedlings. Seedlings in clear shelters grew taller than control seedlings, but none were self-supporting after removal of the shelters. Reduced growth in the brown shelters was attributed to an 80% reduction in photosynthetically active radiation (PAR). In the field study, 2-year-old red oak seedlings grown in brown and clear shelters experienced lower mortality (55% and 40%, respectively) than unsheltered seedlings (60%), but most were unable to support themselves after removal of the shelters because of increased height growth and inadequate stem development. Half of the seedlings inside clear shelters experienced dieback of new growth during an unusually warm early growing season. Seedlings in the wire shelters were not supported or protected from mechanical stress (wind) and they were exposed to ambient temperatures. Wire-shelter seedlings had the lowest mortality (20%) and were self-supporting but significantly shorter than seedlings in the clear and brown shelters. Wire shelters show promise as an alternative to solid plastic shelters for producing self-supporting seedlings with comparable growth and greater survival at a similar overall cost.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown greenhouse shelters significantly reduced stem, leaf and root development.

Taxon
Northern Red OakQuercus rubrat0
Treatment
brown plastice0
Outcome
stem, leaf, and root developmente0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
unsheltered seedlingse0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the greenhouse, seedlings grown in brown plastic and clear acrylic shelters had significantly reduced stem, leaf, and root development compared to unsheltered seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–436 · show in text ↑
t0

“Northern Red Oak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Clear greenhouse shelters significantly reduced stem, leaf and root development.

Taxon
Northern Red OakQuercus rubrat0
Treatment
clear acrylic shelterse0
Outcome
stem, leaf, and root developmente0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
unsheltered seedlingse0
Setting
greenhousee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the greenhouse, seedlings grown in brown plastic and clear acrylic shelters had significantly reduced stem, leaf, and root development compared to unsheltered seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–436 · show in text ↑
t0

“Northern Red Oak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clear-shelter seedlings grew taller than controls but none supported themselves after shelter removal.

Taxon
Northern Red OakQuercus rubrat0
Treatment
clear shelterse0
Outcome
grew tallere0
Direction
tallere0
Qualifier
none were self-supporting after removal of the shelterse0
Comparator
control seedlingse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings in clear shelters grew taller than control seedlings, but none were self-supporting after removal of the shelters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“Northern Red Oak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown-shelter growth reduction was attributed to 80% lower PAR.

Taxon
Northern Red OakQuercus rubrat0
Treatment
brown shelterse0
Outcome
Reduced growthe0
Qualifier
80% reduction in photosynthetically active radiation (PAR)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Reduced growth in the brown shelters was attributed to an 80% reduction in photosynthetically active radiation (PAR).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–679 · show in text ↑
t0

“Northern Red Oak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown field shelters had 55% mortality versus 60% without shelters.

Taxon
red oakQuercus rubrae0
Treatment
browne0
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
55%e0
Qualifier
60%e0
Comparator
unsheltered seedlingse0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the field study, 2-year-old red oak seedlings grown in brown and clear shelters experienced lower mortality (55% and 40%, respectively) than unsheltered seedlings (60%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clear field shelters had 40% mortality versus 60% without shelters.

Taxon
red oakQuercus rubrae0
Treatment
clear shelterse0
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
40%e0
Qualifier
60%e0
Comparator
unsheltered seedlingse0
Setting
fielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In the field study, 2-year-old red oak seedlings grown in brown and clear shelters experienced lower mortality (55% and 40%, respectively) than unsheltered seedlings (60%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–851 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most brown-shelter field seedlings could not support themselves because height growth exceeded stem development.

Taxon
Northern Red OakQuercus rubrat0
Treatment
browne1
Outcome
unable to support themselvese0
Qualifier
increased height growth and inadequate stem developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but most were unable to support themselves after removal of the shelters because of increased height growth and inadequate stem development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Northern Red Oak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“red oak seedlings grown in brown and clear shelters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–762 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most clear-shelter field seedlings could not support themselves because height growth exceeded stem development.

Taxon
Northern Red OakQuercus rubrat0
Treatment
clear shelterse1
Outcome
unable to support themselvese0
Qualifier
increased height growth and inadequate stem developmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but most were unable to support themselves after removal of the shelters because of increased height growth and inadequate stem development.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Northern Red Oak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
e1

“red oak seedlings grown in brown and clear shelters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–762 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Half of clear-shelter seedlings experienced new growth dieback in a warm early season.

Taxon
Northern Red OakQuercus rubrat0
Treatment
clear shelterse0
Outcome
dieback of new growthe0
Value
Halfe0
Qualifier
unusually warm early growing seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Half of the seedlings inside clear shelters experienced dieback of new growth during an unusually warm early growing season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1118 · show in text ↑
t0

“Northern Red Oak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wire-shelter seedlings were unsupported, exposed to wind and ambient temperatures.

Taxon
Northern Red OakQuercus rubrat0
Treatment
wire shelterse0
Outcome
not supported or protected from mechanical stress (wind)e0
Qualifier
exposed to ambient temperaturese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings in the wire shelters were not supported or protected from mechanical stress (wind) and they were exposed to ambient temperatures.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1119–1258 · show in text ↑
t0

“Northern Red Oak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wire-shelter seedlings had the lowest mortality, 20%, and supported themselves.

Taxon
Northern Red OakQuercus rubrat0
Outcome
mortalitye0
Direction
loweste0
Value
20%e0
Qualifier
self-supportinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wire-shelter seedlings had the lowest mortality (20%) and were self-supporting but significantly shorter than seedlings in the clear and brown shelters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1411 · show in text ↑
t0

“Northern Red Oak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wire-shelter seedlings were significantly shorter than clear- and brown-shelter seedlings.

Taxon
Northern Red OakQuercus rubrat0
Treatment
Wire-sheltere0
Outcome
shortere0
Direction
shortere0
Comparator
clear and brown shelterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wire-shelter seedlings had the lowest mortality (20%) and were self-supporting but significantly shorter than seedlings in the clear and brown shelters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1259–1411 · show in text ↑
t0

“Northern Red Oak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Wire shelters are a promising alternative for self-supporting seedlings with comparable growth, greater survival and similar cost.

Taxon
Northern Red OakQuercus rubrat0
Outcome
Wire shelterse0
Qualifier
comparable growth and greater survival at a similar overall coste0
Comparator
solid plastic shelterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus rubra
Quercus rubra · TaxonNicholas A. Tonelli from Northeast Pennsylvania, USA · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wire shelters show promise as an alternative to solid plastic shelters for producing self-supporting seedlings with comparable growth and greater survival at a similar overall cost.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1593 · show in text ↑
t0

“Northern Red Oak”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–47 · show in text ↑