Paper · 2012 · Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca

The Effect of Tillage System and Rimsulfuron Application on Weed Flora, Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (AM) Root Colonization and Yield of Maize (Zea mays L.)

Dimitrios BILALIS; Vassilios TRIANTAFYLLIDIS; Anestis KARKANIS; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted to determine the effects of tillage system and rimsulfuron application on weed flora and growth of maize (Zea mays L. Mitic F1) at a site with no history of pesticide use for the last 5 years. A randomized complete block design was employed with three replicates per treatment (conventional tillage without rimsulfuron application (control), no-tillage with rimsulfuron application (NT+Rim) and conventional tillage with rimsulfuron application (CT+Rim)). The lowest leaf area index, dry weight and yield of maize were recorded in NT+Rim plots. In addition, the highest soil bulk density was determined in NT+Rim plots. Moreover, the rimsulfuron application resulted in significant reduction in the root growth and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonization. The lowest root biomass, root length density, root surface and AM root colonization was found in CT+Rim plots. The lowest weed number and biomass was also observed at CT+Rim plots. Sustainability yield index (SYI) shown that the maize crop is more stable under conventional tillage compared with no-tillage. Our results indicated that root growth was reduced significant by rimsulfuron application but statistically significant lower maize yield was obtained in no-tillage system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage with rimsulfuron gave the lowest maize leaf area index and dry weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
NT+Rime0
Outcome
leaf area index, dry weighte0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest leaf area index, dry weight and yield of maize were recorded in NT+Rim plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–576 · show in text ↑
e1

“no-tillage with rimsulfuron application (NT+Rim)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 375–423 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage with rimsulfuron gave the lowest maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
NT+Rime0
Outcome
yield of maizee0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest leaf area index, dry weight and yield of maize were recorded in NT+Rim plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil bulk density was highest in no-tillage-plus-rimsulfuron plots.

Treatment
NT+Rime0
Outcome
soil bulk densitye0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the highest soil bulk density was determined in NT+Rim plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–651 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 131–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rimsulfuron significantly reduced maize root growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
roote0
Treatment
rimsulfuron applicatione0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rimsulfuron application resulted in significant reduction in the root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–743 · show in text ↑
e1

“growth of maize (Zea mays L. Mitic F1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 122–160 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rimsulfuron significantly reduced arbuscular mycorrhizal root colonization.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
rimsulfuron applicatione0
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM)e0symbiont
Outcome
arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonizatione0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rimsulfuron application resulted in significant reduction in the root growth and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–788 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 131–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with rimsulfuron had the lowest root biomass, length density and surface.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
CT+Rime0
Outcome
root biomass, root length density, root surfacee0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest root biomass, root length density, root surface and AM root colonization was found in CT+Rim plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–899 · show in text ↑
e1

“conventional tillage with rimsulfuron application (CT+Rim)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–486 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 131–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with rimsulfuron had the lowest AM root colonization.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
CT+Rime0
Interactor
Arbuscular Mycorrhizalt1symbiont
Outcome
AM root colonizatione0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest root biomass, root length density, root surface and AM root colonization was found in CT+Rim plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 131–150 · show in text ↑
t1

“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (AM) Root Colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage with rimsulfuron produced the lowest weed number and biomass.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
CT+Rime0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed number and biomasse0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest weed number and biomass was also observed at CT+Rim plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–969 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 131–150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield stability was greater under conventional tillage than no-tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
stablee0
Direction
more stablee0
Comparator
no-tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maize crop is more stable under conventional tillage compared with no-tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1096 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize yield was significantly lower under no-tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
no-tillage systeme0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“statistically significant lower maize yield was obtained in no-tillage system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1269 · show in text ↑

rimsulfuron · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

rimsulfuron · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

tillage · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 33 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

tillage · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

111 papers: 65 positive, 46 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

tillage · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

152 papers: 124 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 124 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

148 papers more in this group

See all 152 papers →

tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

283 papers: 196 positive, 87 negative or no effect

86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 196 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

279 papers more in this group

See all 283 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.