Abstract
Field experiments were conducted to determine the effects of tillage system and rimsulfuron application on weed flora and growth of maize (Zea mays L. Mitic F1) at a site with no history of pesticide use for the last 5 years. A randomized complete block design was employed with three replicates per treatment (conventional tillage without rimsulfuron application (control), no-tillage with rimsulfuron application (NT+Rim) and conventional tillage with rimsulfuron application (CT+Rim)). The lowest leaf area index, dry weight and yield of maize were recorded in NT+Rim plots. In addition, the highest soil bulk density was determined in NT+Rim plots. Moreover, the rimsulfuron application resulted in significant reduction in the root growth and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonization. The lowest root biomass, root length density, root surface and AM root colonization was found in CT+Rim plots. The lowest weed number and biomass was also observed at CT+Rim plots. Sustainability yield index (SYI) shown that the maize crop is more stable under conventional tillage compared with no-tillage. Our results indicated that root growth was reduced significant by rimsulfuron application but statistically significant lower maize yield was obtained in no-tillage system.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage with rimsulfuron gave the lowest maize leaf area index and dry weight.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The lowest leaf area index, dry weight and yield of maize were recorded in NT+Rim plots”
e1“no-tillage with rimsulfuron application (NT+Rim)”
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage with rimsulfuron gave the lowest maize yield.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The lowest leaf area index, dry weight and yield of maize were recorded in NT+Rim plots”
Claim · model-written summary
Soil bulk density was highest in no-tillage-plus-rimsulfuron plots.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“the highest soil bulk density was determined in NT+Rim plots”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rimsulfuron significantly reduced maize root growth.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the rimsulfuron application resulted in significant reduction in the root growth”
e1“growth of maize (Zea mays L. Mitic F1)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rimsulfuron significantly reduced arbuscular mycorrhizal root colonization.
- Treatment
- rimsulfuron applicatione0
- Interactor
- arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM)e0symbiont
- Outcome
- arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonizatione0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the rimsulfuron application resulted in significant reduction in the root growth and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) colonization”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage with rimsulfuron had the lowest root biomass, length density and surface.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The lowest root biomass, root length density, root surface and AM root colonization was found in CT+Rim plots”
e1“conventional tillage with rimsulfuron application (CT+Rim)”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage with rimsulfuron had the lowest AM root colonization.
- Treatment
- CT+Rime0
- Interactor
- Arbuscular Mycorrhizalt1symbiont
- Outcome
- AM root colonizatione0
- Direction
- loweste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The lowest root biomass, root length density, root surface and AM root colonization was found in CT+Rim plots”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
t1“Arbuscular Mycorrhizal (AM) Root Colonization”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage with rimsulfuron produced the lowest weed number and biomass.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The lowest weed number and biomass was also observed at CT+Rim plots”
t0“maize (Zea mays L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield stability was greater under conventional tillage than no-tillage.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the maize crop is more stable under conventional tillage compared with no-tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Maize yield was significantly lower under no-tillage.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“statistically significant lower maize yield was obtained in no-tillage system”
The same questions in other papers
rimsulfuron · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
rimsulfuron · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
tillage · disease · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
50 papers more in this group
See all 54 papers →tillage · weed · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
107 papers more in this group
See all 111 papers →tillage · soil: physics · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 124 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
148 papers more in this group
See all 152 papers →tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 196 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
279 papers more in this group
See all 283 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.