Paper · 1990 · Weed Science

Physiological Response of Rice (Oryza sativa) to Fenoxaprop

Derrick M. Oosterhuis; Stan D. Wullschleger; Ron E. Hampton; et al.

8
claims
13
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Growth chamber experiments were conducted to elucidate the morphological and physiological responses of rice to postemergence application of fenoxaprop. Two rice cultivars, ‘Newbonnet’ and ‘Mars’, and barnyardgrass were treated with 0.17 kg ai ha −1 fenoxaprop at the five-leaf stage. Within 2 days of fenoxaprop application, rice cultivars developed a white chlorotic band across leaves that were in direct contact with spray droplets. Leaf elongation rates for the two rice cultivars were inhibited by 40% after 4 days and by over 50% after 14 days. Inhibition of leaf elongation by fenoxaprop contributed to an overall decrease in leaf area and shoot dry weight. Net photosynthesis was reduced by 35% in fenoxaprop-treated plants 11 days after application, although stomatal conductance was not affected. Nitrogen fertilization prior to fenoxaprop application increased foliar injury of both rice cultivars. Visible injury symptoms showed the following order of susceptibility to foliar-applied fenoxaprop: barnyardgrass > Mars rice > Newbonnet rice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop produced a white chlorotic leaf band within two days.

Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
fenoxaprop applicatione0
Outcome
white chlorotic band across leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Within 2 days of fenoxaprop application, rice cultivars developed a white chlorotic band across leaves that were in direct contact with spray droplets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–435 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop inhibited rice leaf elongation by 40% after four days.

Treatment
fenoxapropt0
Outcome
Leaf elongation ratese0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
40%e0
Qualifier
after 4 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf elongation rates for the two rice cultivars were inhibited by 40% after 4 days and by over 50% after 14 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa) to Fenoxaprop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop inhibited rice leaf elongation by over 50% after 14 days.

Treatment
fenoxapropt0
Outcome
Leaf elongation ratese0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
over 50%e0
Qualifier
after 14 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf elongation rates for the two rice cultivars were inhibited by 40% after 4 days and by over 50% after 14 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 437–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa) to Fenoxaprop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–59 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop-linked inhibition of elongation decreased leaf area and shoot dry weight.

Treatment
fenoxaprope0
Outcome
decrease in leaf area and shoot dry weighte0
Qualifier
Inhibition of leaf elongatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inhibition of leaf elongation by fenoxaprop contributed to an overall decrease in leaf area and shoot dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop reduced net photosynthesis by 35% at 11 days.

Treatment
fenoxaprop-treatede0
Outcome
Net photosynthesise0
Direction
reducede0
Value
35%e0
Qualifier
11 days after applicatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net photosynthesis was reduced by 35% in fenoxaprop-treated plants 11 days after application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–758 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fenoxaprop did not affect stomatal conductance.

Treatment
Fenoxapropt0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stomatal conductance was not affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 769–806 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice (Oryza sativa) to Fenoxaprop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization before fenoxaprop increased foliar injury in both rice cultivars.

Treatment
Nitrogen fertilization prior to fenoxaprop applicatione0
Outcome
foliar injurye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen fertilization prior to fenoxaprop application increased foliar injury of both rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–909 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mars rice was more susceptible to fenoxaprop injury than Newbonnet rice.

Material
Mars ricee0
Outcome
susceptibility to foliar-applied fenoxaprope0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Comparator
Newbonnet ricee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Visible injury symptoms showed the following order of susceptibility to foliar-applied fenoxaprop: barnyardgrass > Mars rice > Newbonnet rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 911–1052 · show in text ↑

fertilization · crop injury · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.