Abstract
Three fruits viz., mango, guava slices and aonla segments were osmo-dried under four different dying conditions viz., cabinet drier (CD), vacuum drier (VD), low temperature drier (LTD) and solar drier (SD). It was found that vacuum drying was superior to other mode of drying, as it retained better quality like acidity, ascorbic acid, and sugar. Further, drying rate, moisture ratio, drying ratio and rehydration ratio were also superior in vacuum drying. In addition, sensory score was higher in vacuum dried product, while the non enzymatic browning was least in vacuum dried product, and maximum in solar dried product.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Vacuum drying retained acidity, ascorbic acid and sugar better than the other drying modes.
- Taxon
- Mango
Mangifera indicat0 - Treatment
- vacuum dryinge0
- Outcome
- acidity, ascorbic acid, and sugare0
- Direction
- retained bettere0
- Comparator
- other mode of dryinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“vacuum drying was superior to other mode of drying, as it retained better quality like acidity, ascorbic acid, and sugar”
t0“Mango, Guava and Aonla”
Claim · model-written summary
Vacuum drying had superior drying rate, moisture ratio, drying ratio and rehydration ratio.
- Taxon
- Mango
Mangifera indicat0 - Treatment
- vacuum dryinge0
- Outcome
- drying rate, moisture ratio, drying ratio and rehydration ratioe0
- Direction
- superiore0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“drying rate, moisture ratio, drying ratio and rehydration ratio were also superior in vacuum drying”
t0“Mango, Guava and Aonla”
Claim · model-written summary
Vacuum dried fruit had a higher sensory score.
- Taxon
- Mango
Mangifera indicat0 - Treatment
- vacuum driede0
- Outcome
- sensory scoree0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“sensory score was higher in vacuum dried product”
t0“Mango, Guava and Aonla”
Claim · model-written summary
Non enzymatic browning was lowest under vacuum drying and highest under solar drying.
- Taxon
- Mango
Mangifera indicat0 - Treatment
- vacuum driede0
- Outcome
- non enzymatic browninge0
- Direction
- leaste0
- Comparator
- solar dried producte0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“non enzymatic browning was least in vacuum dried product, and maximum in solar dried product”
t0“Mango, Guava and Aonla”
The same questions in other papers
processing · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →processing · quality: general · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →processing · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →processing · physiology: enzyme activity · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.