Paper · 2014 · Journal of Agricultural Engineering (India)

Drying Characteristics of Osmosed Mango, Guava and Aonla

P. Suresh Kumar; V.R. Sagar

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Three fruits viz., mango, guava slices and aonla segments were osmo-dried under four different dying conditions viz., cabinet drier (CD), vacuum drier (VD), low temperature drier (LTD) and solar drier (SD). It was found that vacuum drying was superior to other mode of drying, as it retained better quality like acidity, ascorbic acid, and sugar. Further, drying rate, moisture ratio, drying ratio and rehydration ratio were also superior in vacuum drying. In addition, sensory score was higher in vacuum dried product, while the non enzymatic browning was least in vacuum dried product, and maximum in solar dried product.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vacuum drying retained acidity, ascorbic acid and sugar better than the other drying modes.

Treatment
vacuum dryinge0
Outcome
acidity, ascorbic acid, and sugare0
Direction
retained bettere0
Comparator
other mode of dryinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“vacuum drying was superior to other mode of drying, as it retained better quality like acidity, ascorbic acid, and sugar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango, Guava and Aonla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vacuum drying had superior drying rate, moisture ratio, drying ratio and rehydration ratio.

Treatment
vacuum dryinge0
Outcome
drying rate, moisture ratio, drying ratio and rehydration ratioe0
Direction
superiore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drying rate, moisture ratio, drying ratio and rehydration ratio were also superior in vacuum drying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–455 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango, Guava and Aonla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vacuum dried fruit had a higher sensory score.

Treatment
vacuum driede0
Outcome
sensory scoree0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sensory score was higher in vacuum dried product”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango, Guava and Aonla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non enzymatic browning was lowest under vacuum drying and highest under solar drying.

Treatment
vacuum driede0
Outcome
non enzymatic browninge0
Direction
leaste0
Comparator
solar dried producte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“non enzymatic browning was least in vacuum dried product, and maximum in solar dried product”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–622 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango, Guava and Aonla”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–56 · show in text ↑

processing · quality: sugar starch · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

processing · quality: general · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

processing · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 11 positive, 3 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

processing · physiology: enzyme activity · Mangifera indica (mango)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.