Abstract
A study was conducted in Uttar Pradesh, India, during kharif 2002 to examine the response and nutrient uptake of urdbean and mung bean genotypes to optimum nutrient supply on nutrient-deficient sandy loam soil. Treatments comprised: control (no nutrient supply) and optimum nutrient supply (20 kg N, 60 kg P, 20 kg K, 20 kg S and 25 kg Zn/ha, on a weight basis). Irrespective of the crop and genotypes, root and shoot biomass significantly increased with optimum nutrient supply compared to the untreated control. Shoots responded more conspicuously to optimum nutrition than roots in both crops. Mung bean responded to nutrient supply to a greater extent in terms of root, shoot and total biomass than urdbean. The extent of dry matter and biomass yield response to optimum nutrient supply also varied between the crops. Shoot N content in both crops showed significant correlation with shoot dry matter yield in both treatments, and correlation coefficient values varied from 0.81 to 0.87 in urdbean and from 0.75 to 0.76 in mung bean. With optimum nutrient supply, N uptake increased to more than two-fold over the control, ranging between 20.1 and 78.5 mg/pot in urdbean and between 27.5 and 59.8 mg/pot in mung bean. With optimum nutrient supply, shoot P content increased in both crops compared to the control. Genotypes with higher P content showed higher shoot dry matter yield. In urdbean, P uptake varied from 0.69 to 1.75 mg/pot in the control, and 1.60 to 5.29 mg/pot in optimum nutrient supply. In mung bean, P uptake ranged from 0.37 to 1.54 mg/pot in the control, and 1.52 to 3.76 mg/pot in optimum nutrient supply.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Root and shoot biomass of urdbean and mung bean increased significantly with optimum nutrient supply compared with the untreated control.
- Taxon
- urdbean and mung bean
Vigna mungo.jpg?width=60)
Vigna radiatae0 - Treatment
- optimum nutrient supplye1
- Outcome
- root and shoot biomasse1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Comparator
- untreated controle1
- Setting
- Uttar Pradesh, Indiae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“A study was conducted in Uttar Pradesh, India, during kharif 2002 to examine the response and nutrient uptake of urdbean and mung bean genotypes to optimum nutrient supply on nutrient-deficient sandy loam soil”
e1“Irrespective of the crop and genotypes, root and shoot biomass significantly increased with optimum nutrient supply compared to the untreated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Shoots responded more conspicuously than roots to optimum nutrition in both crops.
- Taxon
- urdbean and mung beanVigna mungoVigna radiatae0
- Organ / stage
- Shootse2
- Treatment
- optimum nutritione2
- Outcome
- respondede2
- Direction
- more conspicuouslye2
- Comparator
- rootse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A study was conducted in Uttar Pradesh, India, during kharif 2002 to examine the response and nutrient uptake of urdbean and mung bean genotypes to optimum nutrient supply on nutrient-deficient sandy loam soil”
e2“Shoots responded more conspicuously to optimum nutrition than roots in both crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Mung bean responded to nutrient supply to a greater extent than urdbean in root, shoot and total biomass.
- Taxon
- Mung beanVigna radiatae3
- Treatment
- nutrient supplye3
- Outcome
- root, shoot and total biomasse3
- Direction
- greatere3
- Comparator
- urdbeane3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“Mung bean responded to nutrient supply to a greater extent in terms of root, shoot and total biomass than urdbean”
Claim · model-written summary
In urdbean, shoot N content was significantly correlated with shoot dry matter yield (r 0.81 to 0.87).
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungoe4
- Organ / stage
- Shoote4
- Outcome
- shoot dry matter yielde4
- Value
- 0.81 to 0.87e4
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Shoot N content in both crops showed significant correlation with shoot dry matter yield in both treatments, and correlation coefficient values varied from 0.81 to 0.87 in urdbean and from 0.75 to 0.76 in mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
In mung bean, shoot N content was significantly correlated with shoot dry matter yield (r 0.75 to 0.76).
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae4
- Organ / stage
- Shoote4
- Outcome
- shoot dry matter yielde4
- Value
- 0.75 to 0.76e4
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“Shoot N content in both crops showed significant correlation with shoot dry matter yield in both treatments, and correlation coefficient values varied from 0.81 to 0.87 in urdbean and from 0.75 to 0.76 in mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Under optimum nutrient supply, N uptake of urdbean increased to more than two-fold over the control, 20.1 and 78.5 mg/pot.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungoe5
- Treatment
- optimum nutrient supplye5
- Outcome
- N uptakee5
- Direction
- increasede5
- Value
- 20.1 and 78.5 mg/pote5
- Qualifier
- more than two-fold over the controle5
- Comparator
- controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“With optimum nutrient supply, N uptake increased to more than two-fold over the control, ranging between 20.1 and 78.5 mg/pot in urdbean and between 27.5 and 59.8 mg/pot in mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Under optimum nutrient supply, N uptake of mung bean increased to more than two-fold over the control, 27.5 and 59.8 mg/pot.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae5
- Treatment
- optimum nutrient supplye5
- Outcome
- N uptakee5
- Direction
- increasede5
- Value
- 27.5 and 59.8 mg/pote5
- Qualifier
- more than two-fold over the controle5
- Comparator
- controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“With optimum nutrient supply, N uptake increased to more than two-fold over the control, ranging between 20.1 and 78.5 mg/pot in urdbean and between 27.5 and 59.8 mg/pot in mung bean”
Claim · model-written summary
Under optimum nutrient supply, shoot P content increased in both urdbean and mung bean compared with the control.
- Taxon
- urdbean and mung beanVigna mungoVigna radiatae0
- Organ / stage
- shoote6
- Treatment
- optimum nutrient supplye6
- Outcome
- shoot P contente6
- Direction
- increasede6
- Comparator
- controle6
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A study was conducted in Uttar Pradesh, India, during kharif 2002 to examine the response and nutrient uptake of urdbean and mung bean genotypes to optimum nutrient supply on nutrient-deficient sandy loam soil”
e6“With optimum nutrient supply, shoot P content increased in both crops compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Genotypes with higher P content had higher shoot dry matter yield.
- Taxon
- urdbean and mung beanVigna mungoVigna radiatae0
- Compound
- P contente7
- Outcome
- shoot dry matter yielde7
- Direction
- highere7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e7“Genotypes with higher P content showed higher shoot dry matter yield”
e0“A study was conducted in Uttar Pradesh, India, during kharif 2002 to examine the response and nutrient uptake of urdbean and mung bean genotypes to optimum nutrient supply on nutrient-deficient sandy loam soil”
Claim · model-written summary
In urdbean, P uptake under optimum nutrient supply was 1.60 to 5.29 mg/pot, compared with 0.69 to 1.75 mg/pot in the control.
- Taxon
- urdbeanVigna mungoe5
- Treatment
- optimum nutrient supplye5
- Outcome
- P uptakee5
- Value
- 1.60 to 5.29 mg/pote5
- Comparator
- controle5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e5“In urdbean, P uptake varied from 0.69 to 1.75 mg/pot in the control, and 1.60 to 5.29 mg/pot in optimum nutrient supply”
Claim · model-written summary
In mung bean, P uptake under optimum nutrient supply was 1.52 to 3.76 mg/pot, compared with 0.37 to 1.54 mg/pot in the control.
- Taxon
- mung beanVigna radiatae4
- Treatment
- optimum nutrient supplye4
- Outcome
- P uptakee4
- Value
- 1.52 to 3.76 mg/pote4
- Comparator
- controle4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e4“In mung bean, P uptake ranged from 0.37 to 1.54 mg/pot in the control, and 1.52 to 3.76 mg/pot in optimum nutrient supply”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results
40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
38 papers more in this group
See all 42 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
75 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
75 papers more in this group
See all 79 papers →fertilization · growth · Vigna mungo (black gram)Positive and negative results
86 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
85 papers more in this group
See all 89 papers →fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results
139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
141 papers more in this group
See all 145 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.