Paper · 2005 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Contribution of crop residues to yield and nutrient uptake of irrigated rice ( Oryza sativa) in rice-rice cropping system

K. Surekha; K. Pavan Chandra Reddy

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Directorate of Rice Research experimental farm, ICRISAT campus, Patancheru, Hyderabad, during 1998-2000 on a sandy clay loam soil (deep Aquic Ustorthent) for 5 consecutive seasons (3 wet and 2 dry) under 5 treatments, viz T 1 , 100% straw incorporation; T 2 , 50% straw incorporation; T 3 , 100% straw + green manure incorporation; T 4 ,100% straw burning and T 5 , straw removal to evaluate the effect of different crop residue management practices on grain and straw yields and major nutrients uptake (N, P and K) by rice (Oryza sativa) in rice-rice cropping sequence. Grain yields of rice were significantly influenced by the different crop residue management practices from the third season of residue incorporation, while the nutrients uptake was influenced from second season onwards. During wet season 2000, 11-26% increase in grain yield owing to crop residue management was observed with maximum value in straw + green manure treatment. During dry season 2000, the increase was 15-19%, maximum being under burning treatment. The wet season added straw + green manure showed significant residual effect on the yield (17% more) and nutrients uptake (35, 55 and 37% NPK respectively) of dry season rice. The increased nutrients uptake resulted in significant increase (0.34-0.82 and 0.98-1.18 tonnes/ha in wet and dry seasons respectively) in rice productivity which was clear from the correlation between grain yield and nutrients uptake (r = 0.65**-0.91** and r = 0.55*-0.96** during wet and dry seasons respectively). Incorporation of rice straw either alone or in combination with green manure and straw burning increased the yields (0.56-1.08 tonnes/ha) through improved nutrients uptake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue management significantly influenced rice grain yield from the third season.

Treatment
different crop residue management practicese0
Outcome
Grain yieldse0
Qualifier
third season of residue incorporatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yields of rice were significantly influenced by the different crop residue management practices from the third season of residue incorporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–755 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice ( Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Residue management influenced rice nutrient uptake from the second season.

Treatment
different crop residue management practicese1
Outcome
nutrients uptakee0
Qualifier
second season onwardse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the nutrients uptake was influenced from second season onwards”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–825 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly influenced by the different crop residue management practices from the third season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice ( Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop residue management increased wet-season 2000 rice grain yield by 11-26%, with the maximum under straw plus green manure.

Treatment
crop residue managemente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
11-26%e0
Qualifier
maximum value in straw + green manure treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During wet season 2000, 11-26% increase in grain yield owing to crop residue management was observed with maximum value in straw + green manure treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–980 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice ( Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop residue management increased dry-season 2000 rice grain yield by 15-19%, with the maximum under burning.

Treatment
crop residue managemente1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Value
15-19%e0
Qualifier
maximum being under burning treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During dry season 2000, the increase was 15-19%, maximum being under burning treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1068 · show in text ↑
e1

“increase in grain yield owing to crop residue management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–914 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice ( Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wet-season straw plus green manure increased subsequent dry-season rice yield by 17%.

Treatment
wet season added straw + green manuree0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
17%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wet season added straw + green manure showed significant residual effect on the yield (17% more)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1170 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice ( Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wet-season straw plus green manure raised subsequent dry-season rice nitrogen uptake by 35%.

Treatment
wet season added straw + green manuree0
Outcome
nutrients uptakee0
Direction
moree0
Value
35e0
Qualifier
NPK respectivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wet season added straw + green manure showed significant residual effect on the yield (17% more) and nutrients uptake (35, 55 and 37% NPK respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice ( Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wet-season straw plus green manure raised subsequent dry-season rice phosphorus uptake by 55%.

Treatment
wet season added straw + green manuree0
Outcome
nutrients uptakee0
Direction
moree0
Value
55e0
Qualifier
NPK respectivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wet season added straw + green manure showed significant residual effect on the yield (17% more) and nutrients uptake (35, 55 and 37% NPK respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice ( Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wet-season straw plus green manure raised subsequent dry-season rice potassium uptake by 37%.

Treatment
wet season added straw + green manuree0
Outcome
nutrients uptakee0
Direction
moree0
Value
37%e0
Qualifier
NPK respectivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wet season added straw + green manure showed significant residual effect on the yield (17% more) and nutrients uptake (35, 55 and 37% NPK respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1070–1225 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice ( Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–92 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient uptake correlated with rice grain yield in wet and dry seasons.

Outcome
grain yielde0
Qualifier
r = 0.65**-0.91** and r = 0.55*-0.96** during wet and dry seasons respectivelye0
Comparator
nutrients uptakee0

Not reportedCompoundDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“correlation between grain yield and nutrients uptake (r = 0.65**-0.91** and r = 0.55*-0.96** during wet and dry seasons respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1561 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice ( Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–92 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased nutrient uptake was associated with rice productivity gains of 0.34-0.82 tonnes/ha in wet seasons.

Outcome
rice productivitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.34-0.82 and 0.98-1.18 tonnes/hae0
Qualifier
wet and dry seasons respectivelye0
Comparator
increased nutrients uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increased nutrients uptake resulted in significant increase (0.34-0.82 and 0.98-1.18 tonnes/ha in wet and dry seasons respectively) in rice productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1246–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice ( Oryza sativa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–92 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw incorporation alone or with green manure, and straw burning, increased rice yields by 0.56-1.08 tonnes/ha through improved nutrient uptake.

Treatment
Incorporation of rice straw either alone or in combination with green manure and straw burninge0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
0.56-1.08 tonnes/hae0
Qualifier
through improved nutrients uptakee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Incorporation of rice straw either alone or in combination with green manure and straw burning increased the yields (0.56-1.08 tonnes/ha) through improved nutrients uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1734 · show in text ↑

fire · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 13 positive, 6 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

cultivation system · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 24 positive, 4 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

climate site · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 26 positive, 7 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

organic · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 96 positive, 10 negative or no effect

95 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

cultivation system · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 125 positive, 29 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 26 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

climate site · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

172 papers: 110 positive, 62 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

168 papers more in this group

See all 172 papers →

organic · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

327 papers: 279 positive, 48 negative or no effect

278 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

323 papers more in this group

See all 327 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.