Paper · 2016 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Optimizing nitrogen management strategy under wheat straw incorporation for higher rice production and nitrogen use efficiency

Yajie Hu; Hongcheng Zhang

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Nitrogen (N) application plays an important role in rice production. Limited attention has already been paid to optimizing N fertilizer management strategy for higher grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) of rice with crop residue incorporation. Field experiments were conducted with the objective to determine the response of several N application methods to rice production and to evaluate their NUE. Three N fertilizer application methods, i.e., local farmers' N fertilizer practice (FNP), modified farmers' N fertilizer practice (MNP), and increased the amount of N fertilizer practice (INP), were adopted with zero N application as control (CK). The results showed that, compared with that under FNP, grain yield was significantly higher under MFP, owing to signficantly enhanced total spikelets as a result of more panicles per unit area. Relative to FNP, MNP markedly increased nitrogen agronomic efficiency (AEN), nitrogen recovery efficiency (REN), nitrogen physiological efficiency (PEN) and nitrogen partial factor productivity (PFPN), but AEN, PEN and PFPN of INP were significantly lower. Further analysis showed that the number of tiller, leaf area index, aboveground biomass, SPAD value, plant N content and N uptake at the early vegetative stage were improved significantly under MNP compared to those under FNP, contributing to higher total aboveground biomass and total N uptake.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MFP had significantly higher rice grain yield than FNP.

Treatment
MFPe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
FNPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“compared with that under FNP, grain yield was significantly higher under MFP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–760 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MFP significantly enhanced total spikelets, attributed to more panicles per unit area.

Treatment
MFPe1
Outcome
total spikeletse0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
more panicles per unit areae0
Comparator
FNPe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“signficantly enhanced total spikelets as a result of more panicles per unit area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–851 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with that under FNP, grain yield was significantly higher under MFP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 684–760 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MNP markedly increased nitrogen agronomic efficiency relative to FNP.

Treatment
MNPe0
Outcome
nitrogen agronomic efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
FNPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Relative to FNP, MNP markedly increased nitrogen agronomic efficiency (AEN), nitrogen recovery efficiency (REN), nitrogen physiological efficiency (PEN) and nitrogen partial factor productivity (PFPN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MNP markedly increased nitrogen recovery efficiency relative to FNP.

Treatment
MNPe0
Outcome
nitrogen recovery efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
FNPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Relative to FNP, MNP markedly increased nitrogen agronomic efficiency (AEN), nitrogen recovery efficiency (REN), nitrogen physiological efficiency (PEN) and nitrogen partial factor productivity (PFPN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MNP markedly increased nitrogen physiological efficiency relative to FNP.

Treatment
MNPe0
Outcome
nitrogen physiological efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
FNPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Relative to FNP, MNP markedly increased nitrogen agronomic efficiency (AEN), nitrogen recovery efficiency (REN), nitrogen physiological efficiency (PEN) and nitrogen partial factor productivity (PFPN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MNP markedly increased nitrogen partial factor productivity relative to FNP.

Treatment
MNPe0
Outcome
nitrogen partial factor productivitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
FNPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“Relative to FNP, MNP markedly increased nitrogen agronomic efficiency (AEN), nitrogen recovery efficiency (REN), nitrogen physiological efficiency (PEN) and nitrogen partial factor productivity (PFPN)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

INP had significantly lower AEN, PEN and PFPN than FNP.

Treatment
INPe0
Outcome
AEN, PEN and PFPNe0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
FNPe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“but AEN, PEN and PFPN of INP were significantly lower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1108 · show in text ↑
e1

“Relative to FNP, MNP markedly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MNP significantly improved tiller number and leaf area index at the early vegetative stage.

Organ / stage
early vegetative stagee0
Treatment
MNPe0
Outcome
number of tiller, leaf area indexe0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
FNPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“the number of tiller, leaf area index, aboveground biomass, SPAD value, plant N content and N uptake at the early vegetative stage were improved significantly under MNP compared to those under FNP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MNP significantly improved aboveground biomass, SPAD value and plant N content at the early vegetative stage.

Organ / stage
early vegetative stagee0
Treatment
MNPe0
Outcome
aboveground biomass, SPAD value, plant N contente0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
FNPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“the number of tiller, leaf area index, aboveground biomass, SPAD value, plant N content and N uptake at the early vegetative stage were improved significantly under MNP compared to those under FNP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

MNP significantly improved N uptake at the early vegetative stage.

Organ / stage
early vegetative stagee0
Treatment
MNPe0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
FNPe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“N uptake at the early vegetative stage were improved significantly under MNP compared to those under FNP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1231–1335 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MNP contributed to higher total aboveground biomass and total N uptake.

Treatment
MNPe1
Outcome
total aboveground biomass and total N uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
FNPe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“contributing to higher total aboveground biomass and total N uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1404 · show in text ↑
e1

“under MNP compared to those under FNP”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1335 · show in text ↑

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 115 positive, 9 negative or no effect

114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

fertilization · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

759 papers: 670 positive, 89 negative or no effect

669 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

755 papers more in this group

See all 759 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.