Paper · 2012 · Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants (Julius Kühn-Institut)

UV-B induced damage and recovery processes in apple leaves as assessed by LIF and PAM fluorescence techniques

Kuckenberg, J.; Tartachnyk, I.; Schmitz-Eiberger, M.; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The capability of laser-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (LIF) and pulse-amplitude-modulated (PAM) fluorescence technique as well as RED/NIR-light reflection measurements for detection and quantification of UV-B induced damages was evaluated in greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.). Photosynthetic recovery from short-term UV-B stress was assessed during 7 days after UV-B treatment with the PAM fluorometer. The exposure of apple leaves to UV-B doses in the range of 10-26 W m-2 for 180 minutes (UV-BBE dose = 5.4-14 kJ m-2) affected neither chlorophyll content nor leaf reflection. Although UV-B damage was not visually evident 2 hours after irradiation, it could be detected by PAM and LIF fluorescence techniques with equivalent success. The intensity of LIF, estimated as the integral of fluorescence spectrum, was reduced after UV-B irradiation by 19-30%. A stronger decrease in F686 compared to F740 fluorescence resulted in significantly lower F686/F740 values in all UV-B treatments. Apple leaves displayed a strong and significant reduction in maximum fluorescence (Fm) and a slightly increase in ground fluorescence (Fo) 2 hours after UV-B treatment, as documented by PAM fluorescence measurement. Negative linear regressions between investigated UV-B doses and selected PAM parameters were found with determination coefficients (R2) of 0.50 for Fv, 0.48 for Fv/Fm, and 0.58 for Fv/Fo. Among the PAM and LIF parameters tested, the Fv/Fo ratio appeared most sensitive for detection of UV-B induced damages displaying greatest changes and strongest correlation with the applied UV-B doses. PAM fluorescence images of apple leaves visualised an enhanced spatial heterogeneity of photosynthetic activity with increasing UV-B dose. The disturbance in photosynthetic functionality was followed by a continuous recovery process as indicated by restoring Fo and Fm parameters. A decline in maximum photochemical efficiency Fv/Fm from 0.80 to 0.72 and 0.43 after exposure to 20 W m-2 for 240 and 360 minutes (UV-BBE = 14.4 and 21.6 kJ m-2), respectively, was followed by recovery at 7 x 10-4 and 5 x 10-3 units per hour during the first 48 hours after UV-B treatment. The recovery curves of Fm, Fv, Fv/Fm and Fv/Fo parameters during a week after UV-B irradiation were well fitted with exponential rise to maximum function, such as: y = yo + a (1 - e-bx). However, within 7 days after exposure to UV-B light, apple leaves displayed 14% or 4% lower Fm, and 5% or 1% lower Fv/Fm values compared with control plants, indicating only a partial recovery from photoinhibition and irreversible damages in PSII.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B doses of 10-26 W m-2 for 180 minutes did not change chlorophyll content or leaf reflection in apple leaves.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
UV-B doses in the range of 10-26 W m-2 for 180 minutese1
Outcome
chlorophyll content nor leaf reflectione1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e1

“The exposure of apple leaves to UV-B doses in the range of 10-26 W m-2 for 180 minutes (UV-BBE dose = 5.4-14 kJ m-2) affected neither chlorophyll content nor leaf reflection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–614 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-B damage was not visually evident 2 hours after irradiation, but it was detected by PAM and LIF fluorescence with equivalent success.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Outcome
UV-B damagee2
Qualifier
with equivalent successe2
Comparator
PAM and LIF fluorescence techniquese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e2

“Although UV-B damage was not visually evident 2 hours after irradiation, it could be detected by PAM and LIF fluorescence techniques with equivalent success”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 616–772 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The intensity of LIF fluorescence was reduced by 19-30% after UV-B irradiation of apple leaves.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
UV-B irradiatione3
Outcome
intensity of LIFe3
Direction
reducede3
Value
19-30%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e3

“The intensity of LIF, estimated as the integral of fluorescence spectrum, was reduced after UV-B irradiation by 19-30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

After UV-B treatment the F686/F740 values of apple leaves were significantly lower in all UV-B treatments, with a stronger decrease in F686 than in F740 fluorescence.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
UV-B treatmentse4
Outcome
F686/F740 valuese4
Direction
lowere4
Qualifier
stronger decrease in F686 compared to F740 fluorescencee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e4

“A stronger decrease in F686 compared to F740 fluorescence resulted in significantly lower F686/F740 values in all UV-B treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1023 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum fluorescence (Fm) of apple leaves was significantly reduced 2 hours after UV-B treatment.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Organ / stage
Apple leavese5
Treatment
UV-B treatmente5
Outcome
maximum fluorescence (Fm)e5
Direction
reductione5
Qualifier
2 hours after UV-B treatmente5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e5

“Apple leaves displayed a strong and significant reduction in maximum fluorescence (Fm) and a slightly increase in ground fluorescence (Fo) 2 hours after UV-B treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ground fluorescence (Fo) of apple leaves slightly increased 2 hours after UV-B treatment.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Organ / stage
Apple leavese5
Treatment
UV-B treatmente5
Outcome
ground fluorescence (Fo)e5
Direction
increasee5
Qualifier
2 hours after UV-B treatmente5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e5

“Apple leaves displayed a strong and significant reduction in maximum fluorescence (Fm) and a slightly increase in ground fluorescence (Fo) 2 hours after UV-B treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1025–1192 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fv is negatively related to UV-B dose in apple leaves, with a determination coefficient (R2) of 0.50.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
investigated UV-B dosese6
Outcome
Fve6
Value
0.50e6
Qualifier
determination coefficients (R2)e6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e6

“Negative linear regressions between investigated UV-B doses and selected PAM parameters were found with determination coefficients (R2) of 0.50 for Fv, 0.48 for Fv/Fm, and 0.58 for Fv/Fo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1427 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fv/Fm is negatively related to UV-B dose in apple leaves, with a determination coefficient (R2) of 0.48.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
investigated UV-B dosese6
Outcome
Fv/Fme6
Value
0.48e6
Qualifier
determination coefficients (R2)e6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e6

“Negative linear regressions between investigated UV-B doses and selected PAM parameters were found with determination coefficients (R2) of 0.50 for Fv, 0.48 for Fv/Fm, and 0.58 for Fv/Fo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1427 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fv/Fo is negatively related to UV-B dose in apple leaves, with a determination coefficient (R2) of 0.58.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
investigated UV-B dosese6
Outcome
Fv/Foe6
Value
0.58e6
Qualifier
determination coefficients (R2)e6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e6

“Negative linear regressions between investigated UV-B doses and selected PAM parameters were found with determination coefficients (R2) of 0.50 for Fv, 0.48 for Fv/Fm, and 0.58 for Fv/Fo”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1427 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Fv/Fo ratio was the most sensitive of the PAM and LIF parameters for detecting UV-B induced damage in apple leaves.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Outcome
most sensitive for detection of UV-B induced damagese7
Qualifier
displaying greatest changes and strongest correlation with the applied UV-B dosese7
Comparator
the PAM and LIF parameters testede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e7

“Among the PAM and LIF parameters tested, the Fv/Fo ratio appeared most sensitive for detection of UV-B induced damages displaying greatest changes and strongest correlation with the applied UV-B doses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1429–1629 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAM fluorescence images showed an enhanced spatial heterogeneity of photosynthetic activity in apple leaves with increasing UV-B dose.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Organ / stage
apple leavese1
Treatment
increasing UV-B dosee1
Outcome
spatial heterogeneity of photosynthetic activitye1
Direction
enhancede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e1

“PAM fluorescence images of apple leaves visualised an enhanced spatial heterogeneity of photosynthetic activity with increasing UV-B dose”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1631–1768 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After UV-B exposure, photosynthetic functionality of apple leaves showed a continuous recovery process, indicated by restoring Fo and Fm.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Outcome
continuous recovery processe2
Qualifier
as indicated by restoring Fo and Fm parameterse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e2

“The disturbance in photosynthetic functionality was followed by a continuous recovery process as indicated by restoring Fo and Fm parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1770–1910 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 240 minutes at 20 W m-2, Fv/Fm of apple leaves declined from 0.80 to 0.72.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
20 W m-2 for 240 and 360 minutese3
Outcome
maximum photochemical efficiency Fv/Fme3
Direction
declinee3
Value
from 0.80 to 0.72e3
Qualifier
UV-BBE = 14.4 and 21.6e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e3

“A decline in maximum photochemical efficiency Fv/Fm from 0.80 to 0.72 and 0.43 after exposure to 20 W m-2 for 240 and 360 minutes (UV-BBE = 14.4 and 21.6 kJ m-2), respectively, was followed by recovery at 7 x 10-4 and 5 x 10-3 units per hour during the first 48 hours after UV-B treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1912–2200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 360 minutes at 20 W m-2, Fv/Fm of apple leaves declined to 0.43.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Treatment
20 W m-2 for 240 and 360 minutese3
Outcome
maximum photochemical efficiency Fv/Fme3
Direction
declinee3
Value
0.43e3
Qualifier
UV-BBE = 14.4 and 21.6e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e3

“A decline in maximum photochemical efficiency Fv/Fm from 0.80 to 0.72 and 0.43 after exposure to 20 W m-2 for 240 and 360 minutes (UV-BBE = 14.4 and 21.6 kJ m-2), respectively, was followed by recovery at 7 x 10-4 and 5 x 10-3 units per hour during the first 48 hours after UV-B treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1912–2200 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fv/Fm of apple leaves recovered at 7 x 10-4 units per hour during the first 48 hours after UV-B treatment.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Outcome
recoverye3
Value
7 x 10-4e3
Qualifier
units per hour during the first 48 hours after UV-B treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e3

“A decline in maximum photochemical efficiency Fv/Fm from 0.80 to 0.72 and 0.43 after exposure to 20 W m-2 for 240 and 360 minutes (UV-BBE = 14.4 and 21.6 kJ m-2), respectively, was followed by recovery at 7 x 10-4 and 5 x 10-3 units per hour during the first 48 hours after UV-B treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1912–2200 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fv/Fm of apple leaves recovered at 5 x 10-3 units per hour during the first 48 hours after UV-B treatment.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Outcome
recoverye3
Value
5 x 10-3e3
Qualifier
units per hour during the first 48 hours after UV-B treatmente3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e3

“A decline in maximum photochemical efficiency Fv/Fm from 0.80 to 0.72 and 0.43 after exposure to 20 W m-2 for 240 and 360 minutes (UV-BBE = 14.4 and 21.6 kJ m-2), respectively, was followed by recovery at 7 x 10-4 and 5 x 10-3 units per hour during the first 48 hours after UV-B treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1912–2200 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The recovery curves of Fm, Fv, Fv/Fm and Fv/Fo of apple leaves were well fitted by an exponential rise to maximum function.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Outcome
recovery curves of Fm, Fv, Fv/Fm and Fv/Fo parameterse4
Qualifier
well fittede4
Comparator
exponential rise to maximum functione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e4

“The recovery curves of Fm, Fv, Fv/Fm and Fv/Fo parameters during a week after UV-B irradiation were well fitted with exponential rise to maximum function”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2202–2355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within 7 days after UV-B light exposure, apple leaves had 14% or 4% lower Fm than control plants.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Organ / stage
apple leavese5
Treatment
exposure to UV-B lighte5
Outcome
Fme5
Direction
lowere5
Value
14% or 4%e5
Qualifier
within 7 dayse5
Comparator
control plantse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, within 7 days after exposure to UV-B light, apple leaves displayed 14% or 4% lower Fm, and 5% or 1% lower Fv/Fm values compared with control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2389–2545 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Within 7 days after UV-B light exposure, apple leaves had 5% or 1% lower Fv/Fm values than control plants.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Organ / stage
apple leavese5
Treatment
exposure to UV-B lighte5
Outcome
Fv/Fm valuese5
Direction
lowere5
Value
5% or 1%e5
Qualifier
within 7 dayse5
Comparator
control plantse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, within 7 days after exposure to UV-B light, apple leaves displayed 14% or 4% lower Fm, and 5% or 1% lower Fv/Fm values compared with control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2389–2545 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple leaves showed only a partial recovery from photoinhibition and irreversible damage in PSII within 7 days after UV-B exposure.

Taxon
Malus domesticaMalus domesticae0
Outcome
partial recovery from photoinhibitione6
Qualifier
irreversible damages in PSIIe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“greenhouse experiments with apple seedlings (Malus domestica Borkh.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–313 · show in text ↑
e6

“indicating only a partial recovery from photoinhibition and irreversible damages in PSII”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2547–2635 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: photosynthesis · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 4 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

uv · physiology: photosynthesis · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.