Abstract
Abstract Photosynthetic rates of mature leaves of apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.) from field shoots were measured under high, low, and alternating light conditions (0.5 seconds at each level) in the laboratory. Photosynthetic rates in alternating light were consistently 85% of those recorded under continuous high light. Photosynthetic efficiency was substantially increased under alternating light conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Apple leaf photosynthetic rates under alternating light were 85% of those under continuous high light.
- Taxon
- Apple
Malus domesticat0 - Treatment
- alternating lighte0
- Outcome
- Photosynthetic ratese0
- Value
- 85%e0
- Comparator
- continuous high lighte0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Photosynthetic rates in alternating light were consistently 85% of those recorded under continuous high light.”
t0“Apple Leaf Photosynthesis in Alternating Light1”
Claim · model-written summary
Alternating light substantially increased apple leaf photosynthetic efficiency.
- Taxon
- AppleMalus domesticat0
- Treatment
- alternating light conditionse0
- Outcome
- Photosynthetic efficiencye0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Photosynthetic efficiency was substantially increased under alternating light conditions.”
t0“Apple Leaf Photosynthesis in Alternating Light1”
The same questions in other papers
light · physiology: photosynthesis · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.