Paper · 2011 · Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland)

The effect of light quality on harvested sweet corn by low intensity LED light irradiation at low temperature during short storage

Hirokazu Ohta; Mari Ohta; Tetsuya Suzuki

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sweet corn with husk (Zea mays L. var. saccharata f. Peter corn) was stored at 5°C for 4 d under a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of l μmol m-2s-1 using red and blue LEDs. During storage, the sugar content (Brix) was measured consecutively for 4 d, and the amino acid content was analyzed after 4 d storage. Corn stored under blue LED light at 5°C had higher sugar content than corn stored in a dark, cool condition. Similarly, the content of umami was increased by storage under the blue LED-cool condition,a r esult likely due to increases in aspartic acid and the major amino acid, glutamic acid. The red LED-cool condition was not as good as the blue LED-cool condition for preserving corn, but was much better than dark, room temperature storage. In contrast, the palatability of sweet corn kept at room temperature in the dark quickly declined. Blue LED-cool preservation appears to be a useful technique for storing sweet corn with husk.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue LED cool storage produced higher sugar content than dark cool storage.

Taxon
Sweet corne1
Organ / stage
corn with huske1
Treatment
blue LED light at 5°Ce0
Outcome
sugar contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
a dark, cool conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Corn stored under blue LED light at 5°C had higher sugar content than corn stored in a dark, cool condition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–427 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sweet corn with husk (Zea mays L. var. saccharata f. Peter corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blue LED cool storage increased umami content.

Taxon
Sweet corne1
Treatment
blue LED-cool conditione0
Outcome
content of umamie0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the content of umami was increased by storage under the blue LED-cool condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–518 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sweet corn with husk (Zea mays L. var. saccharata f. Peter corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attributed higher umami to increases in aspartic and glutamic acids.

Taxon
Sweet corne2
Compound
aspartic acid and the major amino acid, glutamic acide0
Outcome
content of umamie1
Qualifier
likelye0

Verbatim

e0

“a r esult likely due to increases in aspartic acid and the major amino acid, glutamic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–609 · show in text ↑
e1

“the content of umami was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–473 · show in text ↑
e2

“Sweet corn with husk (Zea mays L. var. saccharata f. Peter corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red LED cool storage preserved corn less well than blue LED cool storage.

Taxon
Sweet corne1
Treatment
red LED-cool conditione0
Outcome
preserving corne0
Direction
not as goode0
Comparator
blue LED-cool conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“The red LED-cool condition was not as good as the blue LED-cool condition for preserving corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–704 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sweet corn with husk (Zea mays L. var. saccharata f. Peter corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red LED cool storage preserved corn better than dark room temperature storage.

Taxon
Sweet corne1
Treatment
red LED-cool conditione0
Outcome
preserving corne0
Direction
much bettere0
Comparator
dark, room temperature storagee0

Verbatim

e0

“The red LED-cool condition was not as good as the blue LED-cool condition for preserving corn, but was much better than dark, room temperature storage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 611–762 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sweet corn with husk (Zea mays L. var. saccharata f. Peter corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sweet corn palatability quickly declined in dark room temperature storage.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Outcome
palatabilitye0
Direction
quickly declinede0
Setting
room temperature in the darke0

Verbatim

e0

“the palatability of sweet corn kept at room temperature in the dark quickly declined”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–860 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sweet corn with husk (Zea mays L. var. saccharata f. Peter corn)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–64 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended blue LED cool preservation for sweet corn with husk.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Outcome
Blue LED-cool preservatione0
Qualifier
appears to be a useful techniquee0

Verbatim

e0

“Blue LED-cool preservation appears to be a useful technique for storing sweet corn with husk.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–955 · show in text ↑

light · quality: sugar starch · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

light · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 15 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

light · organism · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.