Paper · 2011 · Iranian Journal of Plant Biology

EFFECT OF DIFFERENT CONCENTRATIONS OF SODIUM NITROPRUSSIDE (SNP) PRETREATMENT ON OXIDATIVE DAMAGES INDUCED BY DROUGHT STRESS IN TOMATO PLANT

Fatemeh Nasibi

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Drought stress is one of the main stresses that inhibit the growth of plants due to mainly disturbance of the balance between production of ROS and antioxidant defense mechanism and causing oxidative stress. Sodium nitroprusside (SNP) commonly was used as nitric oxide (NO) donor in plants. In this study, the effect of different concentrations of SNP on alleviation of oxidative stress induced by drought was investigated. Results of the measurements of lipid peroxidation and photosynthetic pigments content showed that low concentration of SNP could protect plants against oxidative stress because under SNP treatment, lipid peroxidation decreased and pigment loss was ameliorated. In this study, the relationship between this defense mechanisms and activity of antioxidant enzymes was investigated. Results showed that drought stress increased the activity of ascorbate peroxidase, guaiacol peroxidase and catalase. Concentration of 100 and 200 µM of SNP increased the activity of APX had no effect on activity of GPX and decreased the activity of CAT in plant under drought stress. In plants which were under drought stress the activity of PAL also increased but the concentration of 100 and 200 µM of SNP had no effect on activity of these enzymes under drought stress. The concentration of 500 µM of SNP decreased the activity of PAL in drought stressed plants. Drought stress and 100 µM SNP treatments had no significant effects on phenol content and 100 and 200 µM of SNP decreased the amount of these compounds under drought stress. In conclusion, in tomato plants, pretreatment with concentration of 100 µM of SNP or below could protect the plants under drought stress, probably through the contracts with ROS and or induction of anti-oxidative enzymes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP treatment decreased lipid peroxidation in drought-stressed tomato plants.

Treatment
SNP treatmente1
Outcome
lipid peroxidatione1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN TOMATO PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“under SNP treatment, lipid peroxidation decreased and pigment loss was ameliorated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SNP treatment ameliorated the loss of photosynthetic pigments in drought-stressed tomato plants.

Treatment
SNP treatmente1
Outcome
pigment losse1
Direction
amelioratede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN TOMATO PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
e1

“under SNP treatment, lipid peroxidation decreased and pigment loss was ameliorated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress increased the activity of ascorbate peroxidase, guaiacol peroxidase and catalase in tomato.

Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
activity of ascorbate peroxidase, guaiacol peroxidase and catalasee2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN TOMATO PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
e2

“Results showed that drought stress increased the activity of ascorbate peroxidase, guaiacol peroxidase and catalase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–918 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretreatment with 100 and 200 µM SNP increased ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity under drought.

Treatment
100 and 200 µM of SNPe3
Outcome
activity of APXe3
Direction
increasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN TOMATO PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
e3

“Concentration of 100 and 200 µM of SNP increased the activity of APX had no effect on activity of GPX and decreased the activity of CAT in plant under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 and 200 µM SNP had no effect on guaiacol peroxidase (GPX) activity under drought.

Treatment
100 and 200 µM of SNPe3
Outcome
activity of GPXe3
Direction
no effecte3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN TOMATO PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
e3

“Concentration of 100 and 200 µM of SNP increased the activity of APX had no effect on activity of GPX and decreased the activity of CAT in plant under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 and 200 µM SNP decreased catalase (CAT) activity under drought.

Treatment
100 and 200 µM of SNPe3
Outcome
activity of CATe3
Direction
decreasede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN TOMATO PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
e3

“Concentration of 100 and 200 µM of SNP increased the activity of APX had no effect on activity of GPX and decreased the activity of CAT in plant under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress increased phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activity in tomato.

Treatment
drought stresse4
Outcome
activity of PALe4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN TOMATO PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
e4

“In plants which were under drought stress the activity of PAL also increased but the concentration of 100 and 200 µM of SNP had no effect on activity of these enzymes under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 and 200 µM SNP had no effect on PAL activity under drought stress.

Treatment
100 and 200 µM of SNPe4
Outcome
activity of these enzymese4
Direction
no effecte4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN TOMATO PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
e4

“In plants which were under drought stress the activity of PAL also increased but the concentration of 100 and 200 µM of SNP had no effect on activity of these enzymes under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1274 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

500 µM SNP decreased PAL activity in drought-stressed tomato.

Treatment
500 µM of SNPe5
Outcome
activity of PALe5
Direction
decreasede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN TOMATO PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
e5

“The concentration of 500 µM of SNP decreased the activity of PAL in drought stressed plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1276–1367 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought stress had no significant effect on phenol content.

Treatment
Drought stresse6
Outcome
phenol contente6
Direction
no significant effectse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN TOMATO PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
e6

“Drought stress and 100 µM SNP treatments had no significant effects on phenol content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

100 µM SNP had no significant effect on phenol content.

Treatment
100 µM SNPe6
Outcome
phenol contente6
Direction
no significant effectse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN TOMATO PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
e6

“Drought stress and 100 µM SNP treatments had no significant effects on phenol content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1454 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

100 and 200 µM SNP decreased the amount of phenolic compounds under drought stress.

Treatment
100 and 200 µM of SNPe7
Outcome
amount of these compoundse7
Direction
decreasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN TOMATO PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
e7

“100 and 200 µM of SNP decreased the amount of these compounds under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1459–1541 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Pretreatment with 100 µM SNP or below is recommended to protect tomato plants under drought stress.

Treatment
pretreatment with concentration of 100 µM of SNP or belowe0
Outcome
protect the plants under drought stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“IN TOMATO PLANT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–140 · show in text ↑
e0

“in tomato plants, pretreatment with concentration of 100 µM of SNP or below could protect the plants under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1558–1679 · show in text ↑

sodium nitroprusside · physiology: enzyme activity · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sodium nitroprusside · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

sodium nitroprusside · physiology: pigments · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

sodium nitroprusside · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

drought · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.