Paper · 2008 · Journal of Plant Biotechnology

In vitro multiple shoot proliferation and plant regeneration in rose(Rosa hybrida L.)

Su-Young Lee; Ji-Hye Jung; Jeong-Hee Kim; et al.

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate an optimal condition for shoot proliferation and regenerate shoots from in vitro leaflet and embryogenic calli from in vitro roots in rose. The effect of BAP on shoot proliferation was somewhat different depending upon genotypes or gelling agents. Leaflets with petiole cut from donor shoots which had been cultured in MS medium supplemented with 0.1 $mg{\cdot}L^{-1}$ NAA for six weeks was effective for regeneration of adventitious buds(ABs) as well as shoot elongation of Rosa hybrida cv. Sweet Pink. Culturing seven leaflet explants per petri plate($100mm{\times}15mm$) was effective for regeneration of ABs. Embryogenesis was shown in the calli induced from roots of Rosa hybrida cv. Sweet Pink cultured in the SH medium supplemented with 11 $mg{\cdot}L^{-1}$ 2, 4-D for four weeks. Color of calli induced from roots was yellow although their color was a little different as type of basal medium.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaflets cultured in MS medium with NAA were effective for regeneration of adventitious buds in Sweet Pink.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Material
Sweet Pinke0
Organ / stage
Leafletse1
Treatment
MS medium supplemented with 0.1 $mg{\cdot}L^{-1}$ NAAe1
Outcome
regeneration of adventitious budse0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rose(Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaflets with petiole cut from donor shoots which had been cultured in MS medium supplemented with 0.1 $mg{\cdot}L^{-1}$ NAA for six weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–426 · show in text ↑
e0

“was effective for regeneration of adventitious buds(ABs) as well as shoot elongation of Rosa hybrida cv. Sweet Pink”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The same leaflet treatment was effective for shoot elongation in Sweet Pink.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Material
Sweet Pinke0
Organ / stage
Leafletse1
Treatment
MS medium supplemented with 0.1 $mg{\cdot}L^{-1}$ NAAe1
Outcome
shoot elongatione0
Direction
effectivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rose(Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–85 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaflets with petiole cut from donor shoots which had been cultured in MS medium supplemented with 0.1 $mg{\cdot}L^{-1}$ NAA for six weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–426 · show in text ↑
e0

“was effective for regeneration of adventitious buds(ABs) as well as shoot elongation of Rosa hybrida cv. Sweet Pink”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 427–542 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Culturing seven leaflet explants per plate was effective for regeneration of adventitious buds.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
Culturing seven leaflet explants per petri platee2
Outcome
regeneration of ABse3
Direction
effectivee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rose(Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–85 · show in text ↑
e2

“Culturing seven leaflet explants per petri plate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–592 · show in text ↑
e3

“was effective for regeneration of ABs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–651 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Embryogenesis was shown in calli induced from roots of Sweet Pink.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Material
Sweet Pinke4
Organ / stage
calli induced from rootse4
Treatment
SH medium supplemented with 11 $mg{\cdot}L^{-1}$ 2, 4-D for four weekse4
Outcome
Embryogenesise4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rose(Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–85 · show in text ↑
e4

“Embryogenesis was shown in the calli induced from roots of Rosa hybrida cv. Sweet Pink cultured in the SH medium supplemented with 11 $mg{\cdot}L^{-1}$ 2, 4-D for four weeks”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 653–826 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calli induced from roots were yellow, with colour varying slightly by basal medium.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Organ / stage
calli induced from rootse5
Outcome
Color of callie5
Value
yellowe5
Qualifier
a little different as type of basal mediume5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rose(Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–85 · show in text ↑
e5

“Color of calli induced from roots was yellow although their color was a little different as type of basal medium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 828–940 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect of BAP on shoot proliferation differed somewhat between genotypes and gelling agents.

Taxon
Rosa hybridaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Material
genotypese6
Treatment
BAPe6
Outcome
shoot proliferatione6
Direction
somewhat differente6
Qualifier
gelling agentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rose(Rosa hybrida L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–85 · show in text ↑
e6

“The effect of BAP on shoot proliferation was somewhat different depending upon genotypes or gelling agents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 180–286 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

in vitro · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.