Paper · 2005 · Agricultural Sciences in China

Direct Adventitious Bud Induction and Plant Regeneration of Rosa hybrida cv. Samantha

Liping Gao; Manzhu Bao

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
30
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effect of explant, site of leaflet, induction period in the dark and combinations of plant growth regulators on direct adventitious bud induction and plant regeneration of Rosa hybrida Samantha was investigated. The results showed that after an induction period of 8 d on MS medium with 1.5 mg L^(-1) TDZ and 0.05 mg L^(-1) NAA in the dark and a subculture on MS medium with 0.5 mg L^(-1) BA and 0.01 mg L^(-1) NAA under light, the best plant regeneration was obtained and the regeneration frequencies of leaflets and petioles were 51.8 and 10% respectively. There was no significant difference in regeneration ability between leaflets at different sites of the compound leaves, longer time of induction in the dark or high concentration of auxin would cause callus formation, which was disadvantageous for shoot regeneration, and the regeneration frequency was significantly reduced. This regeneration system could be applied for genetic transformation of this cultivar in the future.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The specified dark induction and light subculture gave the best plant regeneration.

Taxon
Rosa hybrida cv. SamanthaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
an induction period of 8 d on MS medium with 1.5 mg L^(-1) TDZ and 0.05 mg L^(-1) NAA in the dark and a subculture on MS medium with 0.5 mg L^(-1) BA and 0.01 mg L^(-1) NAA under lighte0
Outcome
plant regeneratione0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“after an induction period of 8 d on MS medium with 1.5 mg L^(-1) TDZ and 0.05 mg L^(-1) NAA in the dark and a subculture on MS medium with 0.5 mg L^(-1) BA and 0.01 mg L^(-1) NAA under light, the best plant regeneration was obtained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–468 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida cv. Samantha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaflet regeneration frequency was 51.8%.

Taxon
Rosa hybrida cv. SamanthaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Organ / stage
leafletse0
Outcome
regeneration frequenciese0
Value
51.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“regeneration frequencies of leaflets and petioles were 51.8 and 10% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–557 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida cv. Samantha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Petiole regeneration frequency was 10%.

Taxon
Rosa hybrida cv. SamanthaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Organ / stage
petiolese0
Outcome
regeneration frequenciese0
Value
10%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“regeneration frequencies of leaflets and petioles were 51.8 and 10% respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–557 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida cv. Samantha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Regeneration ability did not significantly differ among leaflet sites.

Taxon
Rosa hybrida cv. SamanthaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Organ / stage
leafletse0
Outcome
regeneration abilitye0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no significant difference in regeneration ability between leaflets at different sites of the compound leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–677 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida cv. Samantha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Longer dark induction caused callus formation and reduced shoot regeneration.

Taxon
Rosa hybrida cv. SamanthaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
longer time of induction in the darke0
Outcome
regeneration frequencye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“longer time of induction in the dark or high concentration of auxin would cause callus formation, which was disadvantageous for shoot regeneration, and the regeneration frequency was significantly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida cv. Samantha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High auxin concentration caused callus formation and reduced shoot regeneration.

Taxon
Rosa hybrida cv. SamanthaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Treatment
high concentration of auxine0
Outcome
regeneration frequencye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high concentration of auxin would cause callus formation, which was disadvantageous for shoot regeneration, and the regeneration frequency was significantly reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida cv. Samantha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The regeneration system could be used for future genetic transformation of the cultivar.

Taxon
Rosa hybrida cv. SamanthaRosa hybrid cultivart0
Outcome
applied for genetic transformation of this cultivar in the futuree0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rosa hybrid cultivar
Rosa hybrid cultivar · Taxon · picture of its genus (no picture of exactly this name)Primazega · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This regeneration system could be applied for genetic transformation of this cultivar in the future”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–984 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rosa hybrida cv. Samantha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–85 · show in text ↑

1-naphthaleneacetic acid · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

N-benzyladenine · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarResults agree

20 papers: 20 positive, 0 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

class · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

light · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

in vitro · growth · Rosa hybrid cultivarPositive and negative results

19 papers: 17 positive, 2 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.