Paper · 2009 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Long-term effect of tillage and nitrogen sources on the sustainability and productivity of maize (Lea mays)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system under rainfed conditions.

Parvender Sheoran; Virender Sardana; Sheesh Pal Singh; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Field experiments were conducted during 2000-06 to assess the impact of tillage practices and different nitrogen sources on the productivity potential of maize (Zea mays L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend Fiori & Paol) cropping sequence on long-term sustainable basis under rainfed conditions. Modified reduced tillage (RT II) resulted in significantly higher mean maize grain yield (2 199 kg/ha) with 8.3 and 14.6% yield superiority over the conventional tillage and reduced tillage (RT I). Application of recommended dose of nitrogen through inorganic source recorded significantly higher mean grain yield of 2 245 kg/ha in comparison to application of recommended dose of nitrogen through compost and integration of inorganic and organic sources (50: 50 basis). Conventional tillage was found to be superior for attaining higher grain yield of wheat (2 525 kg/ha) under rainfed conditions. However, when RT I was integrated with post-emergence herbicide-based weed control (RT II), significant improvement in yield (9.6%) was noticed and it was found to be at par with conventional tillage. The lowest CV (25.1%) and highest sustainable yield index (SYI) (0.61) recorded with RT II as against the CV of 27.9% and SYI of 0.54 under conventional tillage indicated its more reliability and optimum tillage for not only resource conservation but also for attaining higher productivity under rainfed conditions. Application of 100% N through organic source resulted in significantly lower wheat yield (2 248 kg/ha). However, substituting the source of N from organic to inorganic, a significant improvement in yield was noticed, which was found to be 10.9% with 50% substitution while with 100% substitution it was 10.7%.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Modified reduced tillage raised maize grain yield to 2 199 kg/ha, 8.3% above conventional tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Modified reduced tillage (RT II)e1
Outcome
maize grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
8.3e1
Qualifier
2 199 kg/hae1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize (Zea mays L.)-wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend Fiori & Paol)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–221 · show in text ↑
e1

“Modified reduced tillage (RT II) resulted in significantly higher mean maize grain yield (2 199 kg/ha) with 8.3 and 14.6% yield superiority over the conventional tillage and reduced tillage (RT I)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Modified reduced tillage raised maize grain yield 14.6% above reduced tillage RT I.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Modified reduced tillage (RT II)e1
Outcome
maize grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
14.6%e1
Comparator
reduced tillage (RT I)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–173 · show in text ↑
e1

“Modified reduced tillage (RT II) resulted in significantly higher mean maize grain yield (2 199 kg/ha) with 8.3 and 14.6% yield superiority over the conventional tillage and reduced tillage (RT I)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic nitrogen gave significantly higher maize grain yield than compost or mixed nitrogen sources.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
recommended dose of nitrogen through inorganic sourcee1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
highere1
Value
2 245 kg/hae1
Comparator
recommended dose of nitrogen through compost and integration of inorganic and organic sources (50: 50 basis)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize (Zea mays L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 154–173 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of recommended dose of nitrogen through inorganic source recorded significantly higher mean grain yield of 2 245 kg/ha in comparison to application of recommended dose of nitrogen through compost and integration of inorganic and organic sources (50: 50 basis)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave superior wheat yield of 2 525 kg/ha under rainfed conditions.

Treatment
Conventional tillagee1
Outcome
grain yield of wheate1
Direction
highere1
Value
2 525 kg/hae1
Setting
rainfed conditionse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend Fiori & Paol)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–221 · show in text ↑
e1

“Conventional tillage was found to be superior for attaining higher grain yield of wheat (2 525 kg/ha) under rainfed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding post-emergence herbicide weed control to RT I increased wheat yield by 9.6% and matched conventional tillage.

Treatment
RT I was integrated with post-emergence herbicide-based weed control (RT II)e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
improvemente1
Value
9.6%e1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend Fiori & Paol)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–221 · show in text ↑
e1

“when RT I was integrated with post-emergence herbicide-based weed control (RT II), significant improvement in yield (9.6%) was noticed and it was found to be at par with conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1095 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RT II had a lower yield CV, 25.1%, than conventional tillage at 27.9%.

Treatment
RT IIe1
Outcome
CVe1
Direction
loweste1
Value
25.1%e1
Qualifier
27.9%e1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend Fiori & Paol)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–221 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest CV (25.1%) and highest sustainable yield index (SYI) (0.61) recorded with RT II as against the CV of 27.9% and SYI of 0.54 under conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

RT II had a higher sustainable yield index, 0.61, than conventional tillage at 0.54.

Treatment
RT IIe1
Outcome
sustainable yield index (SYI)e1
Direction
higheste1
Value
0.61e1
Qualifier
0.54e1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend Fiori & Paol)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–221 · show in text ↑
e1

“The lowest CV (25.1%) and highest sustainable yield index (SYI) (0.61) recorded with RT II as against the CV of 27.9% and SYI of 0.54 under conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1257 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Entirely organic nitrogen resulted in significantly lower wheat yield of 2 248 kg/ha.

Treatment
100% N through organic sourcee1
Outcome
wheat yielde1
Direction
lowere1
Value
2 248 kg/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend Fiori & Paol)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–221 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 100% N through organic source resulted in significantly lower wheat yield (2 248 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing half the organic nitrogen with inorganic nitrogen improved wheat yield by 10.9%.

Treatment
50% substitutione1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
improvemente1
Value
10.9%e1
Comparator
organice1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend Fiori & Paol)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–221 · show in text ↑
e1

“substituting the source of N from organic to inorganic, a significant improvement in yield was noticed, which was found to be 10.9% with 50% substitution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Replacing all organic nitrogen with inorganic nitrogen improved wheat yield by 10.7%.

Treatment
100% substitutione1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
improvemente1
Value
10.7%e1
Comparator
organice1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend Fiori & Paol)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–221 · show in text ↑
e1

“substituting the source of N from organic to inorganic, a significant improvement in yield was noticed, which was found to be 10.9% with 50% substitution while with 100% substitution it was 10.7%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1721 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.