Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Adding post-emergence herbicide weed control to RT I increased wheat yield by 9.6% and matched conventional tillage.

A claim from Long-term effect of tillage and nitrogen sources on the sustainability and productivity of maize (Lea mays)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system under rainfed conditions. · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding post-emergence herbicide weed control to RT I increased wheat yield by 9.6% and matched conventional tillage.

Treatment
RT I was integrated with post-emergence herbicide-based weed control (RT II)e1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
improvemente1
Value
9.6%e1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend Fiori & Paol)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 174–221
e1

“when RT I was integrated with post-emergence herbicide-based weed control (RT II), significant improvement in yield (9.6%) was noticed and it was found to be at par with conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 905–1095

Title

Long-term effect of tillage and nitrogen sources on the sustainability and productivity of maize (Lea mays)-wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system under rainfed conditions.

Parvender Sheoran; Virender Sardana; Sheesh Pal Singh; et al. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2009

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-dfd2bf2c04fca1359e74a22f4c327003d4fb244df23ff7b96e55197af40f2482 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this claim · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

554 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.