Paper · 1997 · PLANT PHYSIOLOGY

Direct Evaluation of the Ca2+-Displacement Hypothesis for Al Toxicity

P. R. Ryan; R. J. Reid; F. A. Smith

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
60
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

One explanation for Al toxicity in plants suggests that Al displaces Ca2+ from critical sites in the apoplasm. We evaluated the Ca2+-displacement hypothesis directly using near-isogenic lines of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) that differ in Al tolerance at a single locus. We measured both the growth and total accumulation (apoplasmic plus symplasmic) of 45Ca and Al into roots that had been exposed to Al alone or to Al with other cations. Root growth in the Al-sensitive line was found to be severely inhibited by low activities of Al, even though Ca2+ accumulation was relatively unaffected. In solutions containing the same activity of the Al3+ and Ca2+ ions as above, but also including either 3.0 mM Mg2+, 3.0 mM Sr2+, or 30 mM Na+, growth improved, whereas 45Ca2+ accumulation was significantly decreased. Since most of the 45Ca2+ accumulated by roots during short-term treatments will reside in the apoplasm, these results indicate that displacement of Ca2+ from the apoplasm by Al cannot account for the Al-induced inhibition of root growth and, therefore, do not support the Ca2+-displacement hypothesis for Al toxicity. We also show that total accumulation of Al by root apices is greater in the Al-sensitive genotype than the Al-tolerant genotype and suggest that cation amelioration of Al toxicity is caused by the reduction in Al accumulation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low aluminum activity severely inhibited root growth in the Al-sensitive wheat line.

Material
Al-sensitive linee0
Treatment
low activities of Ale0
Outcome
Root growthe0
Direction
severely inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root growth in the Al-sensitive line was found to be severely inhibited by low activities of Al”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–535 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium accumulation was relatively unaffected at aluminum levels that inhibited root growth.

Material
Al-sensitive linee0
Treatment
low activities of Ale0
Outcome
Ca2+ accumulatione0
Direction
relatively unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root growth in the Al-sensitive line was found to be severely inhibited by low activities of Al, even though Ca2+ accumulation was relatively unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–592 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Mg2+, Sr2+, or Na+ improved wheat root growth in aluminum and calcium solutions.

Treatment
3.0 mM Mg2+, 3.0 mM Sr2+, or 30 mM Na+e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“including either 3.0 mM Mg2+, 3.0 mM Sr2+, or 30 mM Na+, growth improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–753 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–223 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding Mg2+, Sr2+, or Na+ significantly decreased wheat root 45Ca2+ accumulation.

Treatment
3.0 mM Mg2+, 3.0 mM Sr2+, or 30 mM Na+e0
Outcome
45Ca2+ accumulatione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“including either 3.0 mM Mg2+, 3.0 mM Sr2+, or 30 mM Na+, growth improved, whereas 45Ca2+ accumulation was significantly decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 681–810 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–223 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al-sensitive wheat root apices accumulated more aluminum than Al-tolerant root apices.

Material
Al-sensitive genotypee0
Organ / stage
root apicese0
Outcome
total accumulation of Ale0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Al-tolerant genotypee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total accumulation of Al by root apices is greater in the Al-sensitive genotype than the Al-tolerant genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1257 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–223 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that calcium displacement cannot explain aluminum-inhibited wheat root growth.

Outcome
Al-induced inhibition of root growthe0
Qualifier
displacement of Ca2+ from the apoplasm by Ale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“displacement of Ca2+ from the apoplasm by Al cannot account for the Al-induced inhibition of root growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1048 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–223 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest that cations ameliorate aluminum toxicity by reducing aluminum accumulation.

Outcome
amelioration of Al toxicitye0
Qualifier
reduction in Al accumulatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cation amelioration of Al toxicity is caused by the reduction in Al accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1355 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 195–223 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

67 papers: 13 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

aluminium atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 15 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

magnesium(2+) · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

magnesium(2+) · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.