Abstract
The study was conducted to determine the effect of phosphate solubilizing bacteria (N2; Bacillus megaterium M-3, TV-6I; Cellulosimicrobium cellulans, TV-34A; Hafnia Alve, TV-69E; Acetobacter pasteurianus and TV-83F; Bacillus cereus) and organic fertilizer (0, 10 and 20 ton / ha) on the seed yield and nutrient content of chickpea under field conditions in 2010 and 2011 growing seasons. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria used in this study were determined by the separate investigation conducted in chamber room by using ten phosphate solubilizing bacteria and organic fertilizer (control, %5,%10). The tiral were laid out with a factorial design in randomized complete block with three replications. In this study, plant height, primary branches, secondary branches and number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, grain yield and biological yield and nutrient content of stem and seed were determined. According to the results of the study bacteria applications increased significantly biological and seed yield. Bacteria applications without organic fertilizer increased nutrient contents of seed and steed except cupper content. In case of inoculation with organic fertilizer provided more increases in biological and seed yields. The highest seed yield were obtained from application of 20 ton/ha + N2 (Bacillus megaterium M-3) with 1020 kg/ha and 1793 kg/ha in 2010 and 2011 years, respectively. Bacteria without organic fertilizer application were more active in terms of phosphorus uptake in both years.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Bacterial applications significantly increased biological yield and seed yield.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- bacteria applicationse0
- Outcome
- biological and seed yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“bacteria applications increased significantly biological and seed yield”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacteria without organic fertilizer increased seed and stem nutrient contents except copper.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Bacteria applications without organic fertilizere0
- Outcome
- nutrient contents of seed and steede0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Qualifier
- except cupper contente0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bacteria applications without organic fertilizer increased nutrient contents of seed and steed except cupper content.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculation with organic fertilizer increased biological and seed yields further.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- inoculation with organic fertilizere0
- Outcome
- biological and seed yieldse0
- Direction
- increasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“inoculation with organic fertilizer provided more increases in biological and seed yields”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The 20 ton/ha plus N2 treatment produced the highest seed yield in 2010, 1020 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 20 ton/ha + N2 (Bacillus megaterium M-3)e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1020 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- 2010e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest seed yield were obtained from application of 20 ton/ha + N2 (Bacillus megaterium M-3) with 1020 kg/ha and 1793 kg/ha in 2010 and 2011 years, respectively.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment produced the highest seed yield in 2011, 1793 kg/ha.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- 20 ton/ha + N2 (Bacillus megaterium M-3)e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 1793 kg/hae0
- Qualifier
- 2011e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest seed yield were obtained from application of 20 ton/ha + N2 (Bacillus megaterium M-3) with 1020 kg/ha and 1793 kg/ha in 2010 and 2011 years, respectively.”
t0“Chickpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Bacteria without organic fertilizer were more active for phosphorus uptake in both years.
- Taxon
- ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
- Treatment
- Bacteria without organic fertilizer applicatione0
- Outcome
- phosphorus uptakee0
- Direction
- more activee0
- Qualifier
- both yearse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Bacteria without organic fertilizer application were more active in terms of phosphorus uptake in both years.”
t0“Chickpea”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
77 papers more in this group
See all 81 papers →inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
213 papers more in this group
See all 217 papers →fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.