Paper · 2013 · Australian Journal of Grape and Wine Research

Anthocyanin profile and gene expression in berry skin of two redVitis viniferagrape cultivars that are sunlight dependent versus sunlight independent

Y. Zheng; J.H. Li; H.P. Xin; et al.

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
52
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Background and Aims When sunlight was excluded (opacity coefficient 100%) from fruitset until maturity, the red grape cultivar Jingxiu failed to colour while Jingyan (Jingxiu × white grape Xiangfei) developed red colour. The aim of this study was to gain insight into the genetic background that may be responsible for sunlight-dependent versus sunlight-independent anthocyanin biosynthesis in berry skin. Methods and Results The composition and concentration of anthocyanins via high-performance liquid chromatography, and the transcriptional level of structural and regulatory genes via real-time polymerase chain reaction were investigated. Light exclusion suppressed all the anthocyanins in Jingxiu berry skin, but did not change the proportion of the various anthocyanins in Jingyan. UDP-glucose:flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase (UFGT) and a v-myb myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog transcription factor (VvMYBA1) were expressed at a high level in sunlight-exposed Jingxiu, sunlight-exposed and excluded Jingyan, but not in sunlight-excluded Jingxiu, which correlated with phenotypic colouration (red vs not red). There was no difference in the DNA sequence of the VvMYBA1b promoter region between Jingxiu and Jingyan. Conclusions The regulatory gene VvMYBA1 is involved in the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis via the structural gene UFGT, while there must be some other regulatory factors or post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms that differentially regulated VvMYBA1 in Jingxiu and Jingyan in response to sunlight. Significance of the Study The primary control mechanism of anthocyanin biosynthesis in the absence of sunlight would provide information for breeding sunlight-independent red grape cultivars, which would be valuable for cultivation in areas with low sunlight, e.g. glasshouses or other covered cropping.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jingxiu failed to colour under sunlight exclusion.

Taxon
grapee0
Material
Jingxiue0
Treatment
sunlight was excluded (opacity coefficient 100%)e0
Outcome
failed to coloure0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“When sunlight was excluded (opacity coefficient 100%) from fruitset until maturity, the red grape cultivar Jingxiu failed to colour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–151 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Jingyan developed red colour under sunlight exclusion.

Taxon
grapee0
Material
Jingyane0
Treatment
sunlight was excludede0
Outcome
developed red coloure0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“When sunlight was excluded (opacity coefficient 100%) from fruitset until maturity, the red grape cultivar Jingxiu failed to colour while Jingyan (Jingxiu × white grape Xiangfei) developed red colour”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–219 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light exclusion suppressed all anthocyanins in Jingxiu berry skin.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
Jingxiue0
Organ / stage
berry skine0
Treatment
Light exclusione0
Outcome
all the anthocyaninse0
Direction
suppressede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Light exclusion suppressed all the anthocyanins in Jingxiu berry skin”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–713 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light exclusion did not change anthocyanin proportions in Jingyan.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
Jingyane0
Treatment
Light exclusione0
Outcome
proportion of the various anthocyaninse0
Direction
did not changee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Light exclusion suppressed all the anthocyanins in Jingxiu berry skin, but did not change the proportion of the various anthocyanins in Jingyan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 644–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UFGT and VvMYBA1 expression was high in exposed Jingxiu and both light conditions of Jingyan, but not excluded Jingxiu.

Taxon
grapet0
Gene
UFGTe0
Outcome
expressed at a high levele0
Qualifier
sunlight-exposed Jingxiu, sunlight-exposed and excluded Jingyan, but not in sunlight-excluded Jingxiue0

Verbatim

e0

“UDP-glucose:flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase (UFGT) and a v-myb myeloblastosis viral oncogene homolog transcription factor (VvMYBA1) were expressed at a high level in sunlight-exposed Jingxiu, sunlight-exposed and excluded Jingyan, but not in sunlight-excluded Jingxiu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

VvMYBA1b promoter sequence did not differ between Jingxiu and Jingyan.

Taxon
grapet0
Material
Jingxiue0
Gene
VvMYBA1be0
Outcome
no difference in the DNA sequencee0
Comparator
Jingyane0

Verbatim

e0

“There was no difference in the DNA sequence of the VvMYBA1b promoter region between Jingxiu and Jingyan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1226 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer VvMYBA1 regulates anthocyanin biosynthesis via UFGT.

Taxon
grapet0
Gene
VvMYBA1e0
Outcome
anthocyanin biosynthesise0
Qualifier
via the structural gene UFGTe0

Verbatim

e0

“The regulatory gene VvMYBA1 is involved in the regulation of anthocyanin biosynthesis via the structural gene UFGT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1354 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer other regulatory or post-transcriptional mechanisms differ between cultivars in sunlight response.

Taxon
grapet0
Gene
VvMYBA1e0
Outcome
differentially regulated VvMYBA1e0
Qualifier
other regulatory factors or post-transcriptional regulation mechanismse0

Verbatim

e0

“there must be some other regulatory factors or post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms that differentially regulated VvMYBA1 in Jingxiu and Jingyan in response to sunlight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1362–1536 · show in text ↑
t0

“grape cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–93 · show in text ↑

light · quality: postharvest · VitisPositive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

light · quality: phytochemicals · VitisPositive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.