Paper · 2005 · HortScience

(326) Foliar Applications of 6-BA, Potassium Phosphate, and Calcium Chloride Affect Pear Fruit Quality

Xiaogang Li; Ling Jin; Jing Ling; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · public-domain

Abstract

Foliar application of hormones and nutrients can improve fruit quality, but specific conditions for applying hormones and nutrients may vary among fruit species. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of 6-BA, potassium phosphate (monobasic), and calcium chloride on fruit weight, palatability, and storage quality of 8-year-old pear trees, cv. Hosui. Foliar applications of 1 mg·L -1 6-BA, 0.3% potassium phosphate, 0.3% calcium chloride, or 0.3% potassium phosphate + 0.3% calcium chloride were made at 20-day intervals from June until maturity. All foliar applications increased average fruit weight over the control (distilled water). 6-BA or the combination of potassium phosphate and calcium chloride increased fruit weight more than did potassium phosphate or calcium chloride alone. Fruit palatability, measured as the ratio of sugar content to acid content, was significantly lower in 6-BA, potassium phosphate, and calcium chloride treatments than in the control. All treatments increased vitamin C content over the control. Fruit storage quality in calcium chloride or calcium chloride + potassium phosphate treatments was superior to that in the control. Potassium phosphate alone and 6-BA treatments had no effects on fruit storage quality. We conclude that foliar applications of 0.3% potassium phosphate + 0.3% calcium chloride or 1 mg·L -1 6-BA can increase average fruit weight and improve fruit palatability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed public-domain. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All foliar applications increased average fruit weight of pear over the distilled-water control.

Treatment
foliar applicationse0
Outcome
average fruit weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control (distilled water)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Affect Pear Fruit Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“All foliar applications increased average fruit weight over the control (distilled water)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–655 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar 6-BA or the combination of potassium phosphate and calcium chloride increased fruit weight more than potassium phosphate or calcium chloride alone.

Treatment
6-BA or the combination of potassium phosphate and calcium chloridee0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
potassium phosphate or calcium chloride alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Affect Pear Fruit Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“6-BA or the combination of potassium phosphate and calcium chloride increased fruit weight more than did potassium phosphate or calcium chloride alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 657–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit palatability, measured as the sugar to acid ratio, was significantly lower in the 6-BA, potassium phosphate and calcium chloride treatments than in the control.

Treatment
6-BA, potassium phosphate, and calcium chloride treatmentse0
Outcome
Fruit palatabilitye0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
ratio of sugar content to acid contente0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Affect Pear Fruit Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit palatability, measured as the ratio of sugar content to acid content, was significantly lower in 6-BA, potassium phosphate, and calcium chloride treatments than in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All foliar treatments increased vitamin C content over the control.

Treatment
All treatmentse0
Outcome
vitamin C contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Affect Pear Fruit Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“All treatments increased vitamin C content over the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit storage quality in the calcium chloride and calcium chloride + potassium phosphate treatments was superior to that in the control.

Treatment
calcium chloride or calcium chloride + potassium phosphate treatmentse0
Outcome
Fruit storage qualitye0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Affect Pear Fruit Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fruit storage quality in calcium chloride or calcium chloride + potassium phosphate treatments was superior to that in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1053–1183 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium phosphate alone and 6-BA treatments had no effect on fruit storage quality.

Treatment
Potassium phosphate alone and 6-BA treatmentse0
Outcome
fruit storage qualitye0
Direction
no effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Affect Pear Fruit Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“Potassium phosphate alone and 6-BA treatments had no effects on fruit storage quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1270 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that foliar 0.3% potassium phosphate + 0.3% calcium chloride or 1 mg/L 6-BA can increase average fruit weight and improve fruit palatability.

Treatment
foliar applications of 0.3% potassium phosphate + 0.3% calcium chloridee0
Outcome
increase average fruit weight and improve fruit palatabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Affect Pear Fruit Quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e0

“We conclude that foliar applications of 0.3% potassium phosphate + 0.3% calcium chloride or 1 mg·L -1 6-BA can increase average fruit weight and improve fruit palatability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1443 · show in text ↑

calcium chloride dihydrate · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Results differ

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

N-benzyladenine · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: general · Pyrus communis (pear)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · yield · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.