Paper · 2004 · Crop Management

Zinc Enhances Sugar Beet Emergence and Yield on a Calcareous Soil with Marginal Zinc Availability

W. Bart Stevens; Abdel O. Mesbah

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Zinc fertilization by broadcast, foliar, and seed‐row application methods were evaluated as a means to enhance sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.) production on a calcareous soil with marginal (0.5 to 1.0 ppm) Zn availability. Seed‐row‐applied ZnSO 4 (ZnSO 4 at 6 lb/acre, Zn at 2 lb/acre) resulted in the most consistent benefit to root yield over the three year study, resulting in an 11% (2.8 ton/acre) root yield increase compared to no Zn application. Broadcast and foliar applications of Zn plus B, Fe, and Mn produced lesser and more sporadic yield increases than did seed‐row‐applied ZnSO 4 . Placing the salt‐based ZnSO 4 in direct contact with seed did not appear to have inhibited seedling emergence; rather it enhanced the rate of emergence in two of the three years. There was evidence that seed‐row application of ZnSO 4 resulted in stronger and more vigorous seedlings than those obtained with other Zn application methods. Because this study was conducted at only a single location, additional research at other locations is necessary to validate results and justify changes to current guidelines.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-row ZnSO4 increased sugar beet root yield by 11% (2.8 ton/acre) relative to no Zn application over three years.

Treatment
Seed‐row‐applied ZnSO 4e0
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
11% (2.8 ton/acre)e0
Comparator
no Zn applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed‐row‐applied ZnSO 4 (ZnSO 4 at 6 lb/acre, Zn at 2 lb/acre) resulted in the most consistent benefit to root yield over the three year study, resulting in an 11% (2.8 ton/acre) root yield increase compared to no Zn application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 222–450 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broadcast and foliar Zn plus B, Fe, and Mn produced smaller and less consistent yield increases than seed-row ZnSO4.

Treatment
Broadcast and foliar applications of Zn plus B, Fe, and Mne0
Outcome
yield increasese0
Direction
lessere0
Comparator
seed‐row‐applied ZnSO 4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Broadcast and foliar applications of Zn plus B, Fe, and Mn produced lesser and more sporadic yield increases than did seed‐row‐applied ZnSO 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 452–593 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct seed contact with salt-based ZnSO4 did not appear to inhibit sugar beet seedling emergence.

Treatment
Placing the salt‐based ZnSO 4 in direct contact with seede0
Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Direction
did not appear to have inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Placing the salt‐based ZnSO 4 in direct contact with seed did not appear to have inhibited seedling emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–705 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct seed contact with ZnSO4 enhanced emergence rate in two of three years.

Treatment
Placing the salt‐based ZnSO 4 in direct contact with seede1
Outcome
rate of emergencee0
Direction
enhancede0
Qualifier
two of the three yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rather it enhanced the rate of emergence in two of the three years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–773 · show in text ↑
e1

“Placing the salt‐based ZnSO 4 in direct contact with seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–653 · show in text ↑
e2

“sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–141 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed-row ZnSO4 gave stronger, more vigorous seedlings than other Zn methods.

Treatment
seed‐row application of ZnSO 4e0
Outcome
stronger and more vigorous seedlingse0
Direction
strongere0
Comparator
other Zn application methodse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed‐row application of ZnSO 4 resulted in stronger and more vigorous seedlings than those obtained with other Zn application methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–932 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–141 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors call for tests at other locations before changing guidelines.

Outcome
additional research at other locationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“additional research at other locations is necessary to validate results and justify changes to current guidelines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 994–1107 · show in text ↑
e1

“sugar beet ( Beta vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 111–141 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results differ

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

manganese atom · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

zinc sulfate · growth · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc sulfate · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

iron atom · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

transplanting · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 14 positive, 4 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

application · yield · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

120 papers: 112 positive, 8 negative or no effect

111 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.