Paper · 2006 · Functional Plant Biology

Influence of nutrient supply and water vapour pressure on root architecture of Douglas-fir and western hemlock seedlings

Timothy S. S. Conlin; R. van den Driessche

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Root growth responses of Douglas-fir [Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco] and western hemlock (Tsuga heterophylla Raf. Sarg.) seedlings to three nutrient concentrations and two shoot vapour pressure deficits were measured. Both species gained dry mass at high and medium nutrient treatments throughout the experiment, but not at low nutrition. Low nutrition gave highest ratios of projected leaf surface area to total root length in both species. Douglas-fir geometry differed from that of hemlock, with longer interior link lengths, particularly at the lowest nutrition. Douglas-fir showed greater numbers of exterior-interior links than hemlock. More links were observed at medium and high nutrition than at low nutrition for both species. Exterior-interior links increased over time for the two highest nutrient treatments. Significant topological differences were observed between species, the lowest and two highest nutrient treatments, and high and low vapour pressure deficits. Both species showed herring-bone root architecture at the lowest nutrition. This architectural configuration became more pronounced in hemlock seedlings grown under higher vapour pressure deficits. Faster-growing Douglas-fir had a dichotomous architecture at medium and high nutrition that was not influenced by increased vapour pressure deficits. Douglas-fir topology appears to be adapted to exploit soil nutrient patches while hemlock appears to rely on efficient exploitation of soil volume.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Douglas-fir seedlings gained dry mass at high and medium nutrient treatments but not at low nutrition.

Taxon
Douglas-firPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Treatment
high and medium nutrient treatmentse0
Outcome
dry masse0
Direction
gainede0
Comparator
low nutritione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both species gained dry mass at high and medium nutrient treatments throughout the experiment, but not at low nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-fir and western hemlock seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Western hemlock seedlings gained dry mass at high and medium nutrient treatments but not at low nutrition.

Taxon
western hemlockTsuga heterophyllat0
Treatment
high and medium nutrient treatmentse0
Outcome
dry masse0
Direction
gainede0
Comparator
low nutritione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tsuga heterophylla
Tsuga heterophylla · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both species gained dry mass at high and medium nutrient treatments throughout the experiment, but not at low nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–344 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-fir and western hemlock seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nutrition gave the highest ratio of projected leaf surface area to total root length in Douglas-fir.

Taxon
Douglas-firPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Treatment
Low nutritione0
Outcome
ratios of projected leaf surface area to total root lengthe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low nutrition gave highest ratios of projected leaf surface area to total root length in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–447 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-fir and western hemlock seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nutrition gave the highest ratio of projected leaf surface area to total root length in western hemlock.

Taxon
western hemlockTsuga heterophyllat0
Treatment
Low nutritione0
Outcome
ratios of projected leaf surface area to total root lengthe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tsuga heterophylla
Tsuga heterophylla · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Low nutrition gave highest ratios of projected leaf surface area to total root length in both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–447 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-fir and western hemlock seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Douglas-fir had longer interior link lengths than hemlock, particularly at the lowest nutrition.

Taxon
Douglas-firPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Treatment
lowest nutritione0
Outcome
interior link lengthse0
Direction
longere0
Comparator
hemlocke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Douglas-fir geometry differed from that of hemlock, with longer interior link lengths, particularly at the lowest nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-fir and western hemlock seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Douglas-fir showed greater numbers of exterior-interior links than hemlock.

Taxon
Douglas-firPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Outcome
exterior-interior linkse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
hemlocke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Douglas-fir showed greater numbers of exterior-interior links than hemlock”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–648 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-fir and western hemlock seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Douglas-fir had more links at medium and high nutrition than at low nutrition.

Taxon
Douglas-firPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Treatment
medium and high nutritione0
Outcome
linkse0
Direction
Moree0
Comparator
low nutritione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More links were observed at medium and high nutrition than at low nutrition for both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-fir and western hemlock seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Western hemlock had more links at medium and high nutrition than at low nutrition.

Taxon
western hemlockTsuga heterophyllat0
Treatment
medium and high nutritione0
Outcome
linkse0
Direction
Moree0
Comparator
low nutritione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tsuga heterophylla
Tsuga heterophylla · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More links were observed at medium and high nutrition than at low nutrition for both species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 650–742 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-fir and western hemlock seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exterior-interior links increased over time for the two highest nutrient treatments.

Taxon
Douglas-fir and western hemlockPseudotsuga menziesiiTsuga heterophyllat0
Treatment
two highest nutrient treatmentse0
Outcome
Exterior-interior linkse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tsuga heterophylla
Tsuga heterophylla · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exterior-interior links increased over time for the two highest nutrient treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–827 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-fir and western hemlock seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root topology differed significantly between Douglas-fir and western hemlock, between nutrient treatments and between vapour pressure deficits.

Taxon
Douglas-fir and western hemlockPseudotsuga menziesiiTsuga heterophyllat0
Outcome
topological differencese0
Qualifier
between species, the lowest and two highest nutrient treatments, and high and low vapour pressure deficitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Tsuga heterophylla
Tsuga heterophylla · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant topological differences were observed between species, the lowest and two highest nutrient treatments, and high and low vapour pressure deficits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–985 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-fir and western hemlock seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Douglas-fir showed herring-bone root architecture at the lowest nutrition.

Taxon
Douglas-firPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Treatment
lowest nutritione0
Outcome
herring-bone root architecturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both species showed herring-bone root architecture at the lowest nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-fir and western hemlock seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Western hemlock showed herring-bone root architecture at the lowest nutrition.

Taxon
western hemlockTsuga heterophyllat0
Treatment
lowest nutritione0
Outcome
herring-bone root architecturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Tsuga heterophylla
Tsuga heterophylla · TaxonDoug Kerr from Albany, NY, United States · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both species showed herring-bone root architecture at the lowest nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1061 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-fir and western hemlock seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herring-bone architecture became more pronounced in hemlock seedlings under higher vapour pressure deficits.

Taxon
hemlock seedlingse0
Treatment
higher vapour pressure deficitse0
Outcome
architectural configuratione0
Direction
became more pronouncede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“This architectural configuration became more pronounced in hemlock seedlings grown under higher vapour pressure deficits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1183 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-fir and western hemlock seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Faster-growing Douglas-fir had a dichotomous root architecture at medium and high nutrition, not influenced by increased vapour pressure deficits.

Taxon
Douglas-firPseudotsuga menziesiie0
Treatment
medium and high nutritione0
Outcome
dichotomous architecturee0
Qualifier
not influenced by increased vapour pressure deficitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Faster-growing Douglas-fir had a dichotomous architecture at medium and high nutrition that was not influenced by increased vapour pressure deficits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1185–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-fir and western hemlock seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Douglas-fir root topology appears adapted to exploit soil nutrient patches.

Taxon
Douglas-firPseudotsuga menziesiit0
Outcome
topologye0
Qualifier
adapted to exploit soil nutrient patchese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Pseudotsuga menziesii · TaxonWalter Siegmund (talk) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Douglas-fir topology appears to be adapted to exploit soil nutrient patches while hemlock appears to rely on efficient exploitation of soil volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-fir and western hemlock seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Western hemlock root topology appears to rely on efficient exploitation of soil volume.

Taxon
hemlocke0
Outcome
topologye0
Qualifier
efficient exploitation of soil volumee0

Verbatim

e0

“Douglas-fir topology appears to be adapted to exploit soil nutrient patches while hemlock appears to rely on efficient exploitation of soil volume”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1335–1481 · show in text ↑
t0

“Douglas-fir and western hemlock seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 79–120 · show in text ↑

in vitro · growth · Pseudotsuga menziesii (Douglas-fir)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

in vitro · growth · Tsuga heterophylla (western hemlock)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.