Paper · 1977 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Influence of No-Tillage-Cropping, Carbofuran, and Hybrid Resistance on Dynamics of Maize Chlorotic Dwarf and Maize Dwarf Mosaic Diseases of Corn1

J. N. All; C. W. Kuhn; R. N. Gallaher; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Yield loss from maize chlorotic dwarf (MCD) infection was not significantly increased in a no-tillage compared to a conventional tillage corn cropping system despite the higher incidence of johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Per. (a reservoir of the virus) and greater leafhopper populations in no-tillage. Incidence of maize dwarf mosaic (MDM) may have been increased in no-tillage. The predominant role of the blackfaced leafhopper, Graminella nigrifrons (Forbes), as a vector of MCD was demonstrated by its strong correlation with the disease in the various experimental systems. G. nigrifrons populations were reduced by carbofuran, and this was highly correlated with reduction of MCD and improved yield. Hybrid resistance to MCD was important for optimum yield, however, carbofuran increased the yield of a susceptible hybrid to untreated levels of resistant hybrids. Lesion nematodes, Pralylenchus zeae Graham, and spiral nematodes, Helicotylenchus spp., were reduced somewhat in carbofuran treatments, but populations were not influenced by hybrids or methods of tillage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage did not significantly increase yield loss from maize chlorotic dwarf compared with conventional tillage.

Treatment
no-tillagee0
Interactor
maize chlorotic dwarfe0pathogen
Outcome
Yield losse0
Direction
not significantly increasede0
Comparator
conventional tillagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield loss from maize chlorotic dwarf (MCD) infection was not significantly increased in a no-tillage compared to a conventional tillage corn cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Johnsongrass incidence was higher in no-tillage corn.

Treatment
no-tillagee1
Outcome
incidence of johnsongrasse1
Direction
highere1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield loss from maize chlorotic dwarf (MCD) infection was not significantly increased in a no-tillage compared to a conventional tillage corn cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e1

“despite the higher incidence of johnsongrass, Sorghum halepense (L.) Per. (a reservoir of the virus) and greater leafhopper populations in no-tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 158–307 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize dwarf mosaic incidence may have increased in no-tillage.

Treatment
no-tillagee2
Interactor
maize dwarf mosaice2pathogen
Outcome
Incidence of maize dwarf mosaic (MDM)e2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
may have beene2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield loss from maize chlorotic dwarf (MCD) infection was not significantly increased in a no-tillage compared to a conventional tillage corn cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e2

“Incidence of maize dwarf mosaic (MDM) may have been increased in no-tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 309–384 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Graminella nigrifrons has the predominant role as a vector of MCD.

Interactor
Graminella nigrifronsGraminella nigrifronse3pest
Outcome
vector of MCDe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Graminella nigrifrons
Graminella nigrifrons · InteractorThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID d075-28 (next) . · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield loss from maize chlorotic dwarf (MCD) infection was not significantly increased in a no-tillage compared to a conventional tillage corn cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e3

“The predominant role of the blackfaced leafhopper, Graminella nigrifrons (Forbes), as a vector of MCD was demonstrated by its strong correlation with the disease in the various experimental systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran reduced G. nigrifrons populations.

Treatment
carbofurane4
Interactor
G. nigrifronsGraminella nigrifronse4pest
Outcome
populationse4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Graminella nigrifrons
Graminella nigrifrons · InteractorThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID d075-28 (next) . · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield loss from maize chlorotic dwarf (MCD) infection was not significantly increased in a no-tillage compared to a conventional tillage corn cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e4

“G. nigrifrons populations were reduced by carbofuran, and this was highly correlated with reduction of MCD and improved yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–710 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran-linked reduction of G. nigrifrons was highly correlated with improved yield.

Treatment
carbofurane4
Interactor
G. nigrifronsGraminella nigrifronse4pest
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
improvede4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Graminella nigrifrons
Graminella nigrifrons · InteractorThis image was released by the Agricultural Research Service , the research agency of the United States Department of Agriculture , with the ID d075-28 (next) . · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield loss from maize chlorotic dwarf (MCD) infection was not significantly increased in a no-tillage compared to a conventional tillage corn cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e4

“G. nigrifrons populations were reduced by carbofuran, and this was highly correlated with reduction of MCD and improved yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran raised yield of a susceptible hybrid to the untreated level of resistant hybrids.

Material
susceptible hybride5
Treatment
carbofurane5
Outcome
yield of a susceptible hybride5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
untreated levels of resistant hybridse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield loss from maize chlorotic dwarf (MCD) infection was not significantly increased in a no-tillage compared to a conventional tillage corn cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e5

“Hybrid resistance to MCD was important for optimum yield, however, carbofuran increased the yield of a susceptible hybrid to untreated levels of resistant hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–874 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hybrid resistance to MCD was important for optimum yield.

Outcome
optimum yielde5
Qualifier
Hybrid resistance to MCDe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield loss from maize chlorotic dwarf (MCD) infection was not significantly increased in a no-tillage compared to a conventional tillage corn cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e5

“Hybrid resistance to MCD was important for optimum yield, however, carbofuran increased the yield of a susceptible hybrid to untreated levels of resistant hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbofuran reduced somewhat the lesion and spiral nematode populations.

Treatment
carbofuran treatmentse6
Interactor
Pralylenchus zeae Grahame6pest
Second interactor
Helicotylenchus spp.Helicotylenchuse6pest
Outcome
populationse6
Direction
reduced somewhate6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Helicotylenchus
Helicotylenchus · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)KarmTogo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield loss from maize chlorotic dwarf (MCD) infection was not significantly increased in a no-tillage compared to a conventional tillage corn cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e6

“Lesion nematodes, Pralylenchus zeae Graham, and spiral nematodes, Helicotylenchus spp., were reduced somewhat in carbofuran treatments, but populations were not influenced by hybrids or methods of tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1080 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lesion nematode populations were not influenced by hybrids or tillage method.

Interactor
Pralylenchus zeae Grahame6pest
Outcome
populationse6
Qualifier
not influenced by hybrids or methods of tillagee6

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield loss from maize chlorotic dwarf (MCD) infection was not significantly increased in a no-tillage compared to a conventional tillage corn cropping system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–157 · show in text ↑
e6

“Lesion nematodes, Pralylenchus zeae Graham, and spiral nematodes, Helicotylenchus spp., were reduced somewhat in carbofuran treatments, but populations were not influenced by hybrids or methods of tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–1080 · show in text ↑

carbofuran · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

carbofuran · Graminella nigrifrons · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

286 papers in the same direction as this paper · 812 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.