Paper · 1995 · Biologia Plantarum

Effect of water stress on functioning and structure ofCicer arietinum L. nodules

K. Swaraj; A. S. Nandwal; S. Babber; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. cv. 235) plants were grown in sand culture at moisture equal to 45-50% of sand saturation capacity under greenhouse conditions. 60 d after sowing, pots were divided into four lots, leaving one as control and sand moisture content of others was brought to 25-30% (S1), 12-15% (S2) and 5-6% (S3) of sand saturation capacity, by withholding the water supply and then maintaining the required levels gravimetrically till the harvest. Relative water content of leaves and nodule water content were measured as indices of water stress. With increase in the severity and duration of water stress nitrogenase activity and nitrogen and leghemoglobin content of the nodules decreased and the ratio of leghemoglobin components I and II were changed. Nodules developed under limited water availability showed decreased branching, breakdown of the endodermis, greater compactness and decreased vacuolation of cells in the central symbiotic tissue as compared to the control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing severity and duration of water stress decreased nodule nitrogenase activity.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Material
Cicer arietinum L. cv. 235e1
Organ / stage
nodulese0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
nitrogenase activitye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increase in the severity and duration of water stress nitrogenase activity and nitrogen and leghemoglobin content of the nodules decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–702 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. cv. 235)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing water stress decreased nodule nitrogen content.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Organ / stage
nodulese0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
nitrogene0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increase in the severity and duration of water stress nitrogenase activity and nitrogen and leghemoglobin content of the nodules decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–702 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. cv. 235)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing water stress decreased nodule leghemoglobin content.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Organ / stage
nodulese0
Treatment
water stresse0
Outcome
leghemoglobin contente0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With increase in the severity and duration of water stress nitrogenase activity and nitrogen and leghemoglobin content of the nodules decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–702 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. cv. 235)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress changed the ratio of nodule leghemoglobin components I and II.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume2
Treatment
water stresse1
Outcome
ratio of leghemoglobin components I and IIe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ratio of leghemoglobin components I and II were changed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–766 · show in text ↑
e1

“With increase in the severity and duration of water stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–617 · show in text ↑
e2

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. cv. 235)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodules under limited water availability showed decreased branching versus controls.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Organ / stage
Nodulese0
Treatment
limited water availabilitye0
Outcome
branchinge0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nodules developed under limited water availability showed decreased branching, breakdown of the endodermis, greater compactness and decreased vacuolation of cells in the central symbiotic tissue as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–989 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. cv. 235)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodules under limited water availability showed endodermis breakdown versus controls.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
limited water availabilitye0
Outcome
breakdown of the endodermise0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nodules developed under limited water availability showed decreased branching, breakdown of the endodermis, greater compactness and decreased vacuolation of cells in the central symbiotic tissue as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–989 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. cv. 235)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodules under limited water availability showed greater compactness versus controls.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
limited water availabilitye0
Outcome
compactnesse0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nodules developed under limited water availability showed decreased branching, breakdown of the endodermis, greater compactness and decreased vacuolation of cells in the central symbiotic tissue as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–989 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. cv. 235)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodules under limited water availability showed decreased central tissue cell vacuolation versus controls.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinume1
Treatment
limited water availabilitye0
Outcome
vacuolation of cells in the central symbiotic tissuee0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nodules developed under limited water availability showed decreased branching, breakdown of the endodermis, greater compactness and decreased vacuolation of cells in the central symbiotic tissue as compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–989 · show in text ↑
e1

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. cv. 235)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–37 · show in text ↑

soil water · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

drought · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 3 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

drought · physiology: enzyme activity · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.