Abstract
SUMMARY The vulnerability and adaptation of major agricultural crops to different soils in Austria and Bulgaria under a changing climate and elevated air CO2 were investigated. Several incremental and transient GCM climate change scenarios were created and applied. Warming will decrease the crop-growing duration of the selected crops in the regions of interest. All GCM scenarios, including the climate change effect only, projected reductions in grain yield of winter wheat and spring barley, caused by a shorter crop-growing period. However, when the direct effect of an increased CO2 level was assumed, most GCM climate change scenarios projected an increase in wheat and barley yield and especially in soybean yield. An increased level of CO2 alone had no significant impact on the simulated maize yield reductions under climate change.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Warming was projected to shorten selected crops’ growing duration.
- Taxon
- major agricultural cropse1
- Treatment
- Warminge0
- Outcome
- crop-growing duratione0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Setting
- Austria and Bulgariae1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Warming will decrease the crop-growing duration of the selected crops in the regions of interest”
e1“major agricultural crops to different soils in Austria and Bulgaria”
Claim · model-written summary
Climate change alone projected reduced winter wheat grain yield.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- climate change effect onlye0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reductionse0
- Setting
- Austria and Bulgariae1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“All GCM scenarios, including the climate change effect only, projected reductions in grain yield of winter wheat and spring barley”
e1“Austria and Bulgaria”
Claim · model-written summary
Climate change alone projected reduced spring barley grain yield.
- Taxon
- spring barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Treatment
- climate change effect onlye0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reductionse0
- Setting
- Austria and Bulgariae1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“All GCM scenarios, including the climate change effect only, projected reductions in grain yield of winter wheat and spring barley”
e1“Austria and Bulgaria”
Claim · model-written summary
With elevated CO2, most scenarios projected increased wheat yield.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- increased CO2 levele0
- Outcome
- wheat and barley yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“when the direct effect of an increased CO2 level was assumed, most GCM climate change scenarios projected an increase in wheat and barley yield and especially in soybean yield”
Claim · model-written summary
With elevated CO2, most scenarios projected increased barley yield.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- increased CO2 levele0
- Outcome
- wheat and barley yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“when the direct effect of an increased CO2 level was assumed, most GCM climate change scenarios projected an increase in wheat and barley yield and especially in soybean yield”
Claim · model-written summary
With elevated CO2, most scenarios projected particularly increased soybean yield.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- increased CO2 levele0
- Outcome
- soybean yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“when the direct effect of an increased CO2 level was assumed, most GCM climate change scenarios projected an increase in wheat and barley yield and especially in soybean yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Elevated CO2 alone did not significantly alter modeled maize yield reductions under climate change.
- Treatment
- increased level of CO2 alonee0
- Outcome
- simulated maize yield reductionse0
- Direction
- no significant impacte0
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“An increased level of CO2 alone had no significant impact on the simulated maize yield reductions under climate change”
The same questions in other papers
co2 · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →climate site · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →co2 · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →co2 · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
92 papers more in this group
See all 96 papers →climate site · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- negative
150 papers more in this group
See all 154 papers →co2 · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- no effect
199 papers more in this group
See all 203 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.