Paper · 1964 · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

Effect of N, P, K, and Ca fertilizer application on the growth and yield of grape vines planted in granitic soil and diluvial soil derived from granite

R. ISODA

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

1. In the district of Seto Inland Sea, most of orchards are located on the granitic soil or on the diluvial soil originated from granite. Inthis experiment the effects of application of N, P, K, and Ca fertilizers on the growth and yield of grapes were studied by planting vines in the pots filled with either the granitic soil or the diluvial soil.2. When observed with non-fruiting vines in the first and second experimental years. the growth in both soils was most inferior at the non-fertilizer plot, followed by in the orde of at the non-P plot and at the non-N plot. On the contrary, the non-K plot and the non-Ca plot were similar or somewhat superior to the completely fertilized plot in their growth. However, in the third experimental year the growth became most inferior at the non-K plot, probably on account of fruit bearing. When the barnyard manure was added to the completely fertilized plot, the growth was more promoted.3. In a comparison of the growth beetween the both soils, the granitic soil was better than the diluvial soil in all the plots. With the progress of the experimental year, it became difficult of find out any difference of the growth among the non-K plot, the non-Ca plot, the completely fertilized plot, and the completely fertilized plot applied with the barnyard manure.4. When the effect of fertilization on the fruit bearing was observed, no flower cluster was born at the non-fertilizer plot and non-P plot of the granitic soil and at the non-P plot of the diluvial soil. Although flower clusters were born, number of berry clusters and their total weight were least, and their maturity was markedly delayed at the non-N plot of both soils. This trend was more remarkable in the granitic soils. Concerning the number of berry clusters and their total weight, the non-K plot, the non Ca plot and the completely fertilized plot applied with barnyard manure in both soils were all similar or somewhat superior to the completely fertilized plot. When compared throughout all the plots, both soils were almost the same in the number of berry clusters, but the granitic soil produced heavier crops in weight and the diluvial soil bore the berries of higher sugar content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In non-fruiting vines in the first and second years, growth was poorest in the non-fertilizer plot, followed by the non-P plot and then the non-N plot, in both soils.

Taxon
grape vinesVitist0
Treatment
non-fertilizer plote1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
most inferiore1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grape vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“When observed with non-fruiting vines in the first and second experimental years. the growth in both soils was most inferior at the non-fertilizer plot, followed by in the orde of at the non-P plot and at the non-N plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth in the non-K and non-Ca plots was similar or somewhat superior to the completely fertilized plot.

Taxon
grape vinesVitist0
Treatment
non-K plot and the non-Ca plote1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
similar or somewhat superiore1
Comparator
completely fertilized plote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grape vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“On the contrary, the non-K plot and the non-Ca plot were similar or somewhat superior to the completely fertilized plot in their growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–708 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the third experimental year, growth became poorest in the non-K plot, probably because of fruit bearing.

Taxon
grape vinesVitist0
Treatment
non-K plote1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
most inferiore1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grape vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“in the third experimental year the growth became most inferior at the non-K plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–799 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding barnyard manure to the completely fertilized plot promoted growth further.

Taxon
grape vinesVitist0
Treatment
barnyard manuree1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
more promotede1
Comparator
completely fertilized plote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grape vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“When the barnyard manure was added to the completely fertilized plot, the growth was more promoted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 839–937 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth was better in the granitic soil than in the diluvial soil in all plots.

Taxon
grape vinesVitist0
Treatment
granitic soile1
Outcome
growthe1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
diluvial soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grape vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“In a comparison of the growth beetween the both soils, the granitic soil was better than the diluvial soil in all the plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 941–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No flower cluster formed at the non-fertilizer and non-P plots of the granitic soil or at the non-P plot of the diluvial soil.

Taxon
grape vinesVitist0
Treatment
non-fertilizer plot and non-P plote1
Outcome
no flower cluster was borne1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grape vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“no flower cluster was born at the non-fertilizer plot and non-P plot of the granitic soil and at the non-P plot of the diluvial soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1381–1513 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the non-N plot of both soils, the number of berry clusters and their total weight were least.

Taxon
grape vinesVitist0
Treatment
non-N plote1
Outcome
number of berry clusters and their total weighte1
Direction
leaste1
Setting
both soilse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grape vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of berry clusters and their total weight were least, and their maturity was markedly delayed at the non-N plot of both soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At the non-N plot of both soils, maturity of the berries was markedly delayed.

Taxon
grape vinesVitist0
Treatment
non-N plote1
Outcome
maturitye1
Direction
markedly delayede1
Setting
both soilse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grape vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“number of berry clusters and their total weight were least, and their maturity was markedly delayed at the non-N plot of both soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1682 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Number of berry clusters and their total weight in the non-K, non-Ca and manure-applied complete plots of both soils were similar or somewhat superior to the completely fertilized plot.

Taxon
grape vinesVitist0
Treatment
non-K plot, the non Ca plot and the completely fertilized plot applied with barnyard manuree1
Outcome
number of berry clusters and their total weighte1
Direction
similar or somewhat superiore1
Comparator
completely fertilized plote1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grape vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“Concerning the number of berry clusters and their total weight, the non-K plot, the non Ca plot and the completely fertilized plot applied with barnyard manure in both soils were all similar or somewhat superior to the completely fertilized plot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1738–1983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both soils were almost the same in the number of berry clusters.

Taxon
grape vinesVitist0
Treatment
both soilse1
Outcome
number of berry clusterse1
Direction
almost the samee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grape vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“When compared throughout all the plots, both soils were almost the same in the number of berry clusters, but the granitic soil produced heavier crops in weight and the diluvial soil bore the berries of higher sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1985–2207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The granitic soil produced heavier crops by weight than the diluvial soil.

Taxon
grape vinesVitist0
Treatment
granitic soile1
Outcome
crops in weighte1
Direction
heaviere1
Comparator
diluvial soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grape vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“When compared throughout all the plots, both soils were almost the same in the number of berry clusters, but the granitic soil produced heavier crops in weight and the diluvial soil bore the berries of higher sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1985–2207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The diluvial soil bore berries of higher sugar content than the granitic soil.

Taxon
grape vinesVitist0
Treatment
diluvial soile1
Outcome
sugar contente1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
granitic soile1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“grape vines”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“When compared throughout all the plots, both soils were almost the same in the number of berry clusters, but the granitic soil produced heavier crops in weight and the diluvial soil bore the berries of higher sugar content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1985–2207 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

51 papers: 43 positive, 8 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.