Paper · 1981 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Response of triticale, wheat, and rye to N in a greenhouse

L. Gashaw; L.M. Mugwira

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Triticales (X Triticosecale, Wittmack), 6TA 131, 6TA 298 and 6TA 298 and 6TA 385, Arthur wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and Abruzzi rye (Secale cereale L.) were grown in a soil treated with 0, 50, 100, and 200 ppm N. The objective of this study was to determine the influence of N rate on dry matter yields, N uptake, and N utilization efficiency. The dry matter and N uptake increased while the N utilization efficiency decreased with increasing N fertilizer applied to the soil for all the cultivars. At high N rate, rye had higher dry matter and N uptake than the triticales and wheat; no consistent differences were obtained between triticale and wheat. However, rye and triticale tended to be more efficient in utilizing absorbed N than wheat at the lower N rates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter increased with N fertilizer across all cultivars.

Treatment
increasing N fertilizere0
Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“triticale, wheat, and rye”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The dry matter and N uptake increased while the N utilization efficiency decreased with increasing N fertilizer applied to the soil for all the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake increased with N fertilizer across all cultivars.

Treatment
increasing N fertilizere0
Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“triticale, wheat, and rye”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The dry matter and N uptake increased while the N utilization efficiency decreased with increasing N fertilizer applied to the soil for all the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–510 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N utilization efficiency decreased with increasing fertilizer across all cultivars.

Treatment
increasing N fertilizere0
Outcome
N utilization efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“triticale, wheat, and rye”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–37 · show in text ↑
e0

“The dry matter and N uptake increased while the N utilization efficiency decreased with increasing N fertilizer applied to the soil for all the cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–510 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high N rate rye had higher dry matter than triticales and wheat.

Outcome
dry mattere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
triticales and wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At high N rate, rye had higher dry matter and N uptake than the triticales and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–595 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high N rate rye had higher N uptake than triticales and wheat.

Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
triticales and wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At high N rate, rye had higher dry matter and N uptake than the triticales and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–595 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale and wheat showed no consistent differences at high N rate.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Outcome
no consistent differencese0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no consistent differences were obtained between triticale and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–664 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rye tended to utilize absorbed N more efficiently than wheat at lower N rates.

Outcome
utilizing absorbed Ne0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Secale cereale
Secale cereale · TaxonLSDSL · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye and triticale tended to be more efficient in utilizing absorbed N than wheat at the lower N rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–777 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Triticale tended to utilize absorbed N more efficiently than wheat at lower N rates.

Taxon
triticale×Triticosecalee0
Outcome
utilizing absorbed Ne0
Direction
more efficiente0
Comparator
wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

x Triticosecale
×Triticosecale · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMiquel Pujol Palol · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“rye and triticale tended to be more efficient in utilizing absorbed N than wheat at the lower N rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–777 · show in text ↑

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 12 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

fertilization · growth · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · growth · Secale cereale (rye)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 15 positive, 5 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 142 positive, 34 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 142 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.