Paper · 1979 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

The influence of calcium and boron sprays on corking and nutrition of apples (malus domesticaborkh)

G. M. Greene; C. B. Smith

6
claims
24
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effects of 4 late‐season dilute tree sprays (3741 liters/ha) containing Ca and B on corking severity and nutrition of ‘Yorking’ apples was studied in 1972. Corking severity was observed after slicing the fruit and is expressed as the mean number of cork spots per fruit. Non‐treated fruits had 4.6 spots, 410 pg/g of peel Ca, 110 ug/g of flesh Ca, 31 jig/g of peel B and 10 jig/g of flesh B. Four sprays of CaCl2‐2H2O that applied a total of 55 kg/ha, reduced the spots to 1.4, raised peel Ca to 570 ug/g and flesh Ca to 130 ug/g. Four sprays of Solubor that applied 3.7 kg/ha of B reduced the spots to 2.4 and raised peel B to 138 μg/g and flesh B to 65 μg/g. Calcium nitrate sprays of 80.7 kg/ha Ca(NO3)2’4H2O increased fruit Ca to 520 μg/g (peel), 120 μg/g (flesh), but increased spots to 7.9. The 1973 study conducted on ‘York Imperial’ apples involved the application of 374 liters/ha of spray in each of 8 alternate row‐middle applications. Non‐treated fruits had 2.6 spots, 370 μg/g of peel Ca, 100 μ...

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four sprays of CaCl2 reduced corking spots in apples to 1.4.

Treatment
Four sprays of CaCl2e2
Outcome
spotse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
1.4e1
Comparator
Non‐treated fruitse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The influence of calcium and boron sprays on corking and nutrition of apples (malus domesticaborkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e2

“Four sprays of CaCl2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–425 · show in text ↑
e3

“Non‐treated fruits had 4.6 spots, 410 pg/g of peel Ca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–337 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduced the spots to 1.4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–489 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four sprays of CaCl2 raised peel Ca in apples to 570 ug/g.

Treatment
Four sprays of CaCl2e2
Outcome
peel Cae6
Direction
raisede6
Value
570 ug/ge6
Comparator
Non‐treated fruitse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The influence of calcium and boron sprays on corking and nutrition of apples (malus domesticaborkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e2

“Four sprays of CaCl2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 405–425 · show in text ↑
e3

“Non‐treated fruits had 4.6 spots, 410 pg/g of peel Ca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–337 · show in text ↑
e6

“raised peel Ca to 570 ug/g”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–517 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four sprays of Solubor reduced corking spots in apples to 2.4.

Treatment
Four sprays of Solubore7
Outcome
spotse4
Direction
reducede4
Value
2.4e4
Comparator
Non‐treated fruitse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The influence of calcium and boron sprays on corking and nutrition of apples (malus domesticaborkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e7

“Four sprays of Solubor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–566 · show in text ↑
e3

“Non‐treated fruits had 4.6 spots, 410 pg/g of peel Ca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–337 · show in text ↑
e4

“reduced the spots to 2.4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 595–619 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four sprays of Solubor raised peel B in apples to 138.

Treatment
Four sprays of Solubore7
Outcome
peel Be5
Direction
raisede5
Value
138e5
Comparator
Non‐treated fruitse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The influence of calcium and boron sprays on corking and nutrition of apples (malus domesticaborkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e7

“Four sprays of Solubor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–566 · show in text ↑
e3

“Non‐treated fruits had 4.6 spots, 410 pg/g of peel Ca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–337 · show in text ↑
e5

“raised peel B to 138”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–644 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate sprays increased corking spots in apples to 7.9.

Treatment
Calcium nitrate sprayse4
Outcome
spotse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.9e0
Comparator
Non‐treated fruitse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The influence of calcium and boron sprays on corking and nutrition of apples (malus domesticaborkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“Calcium nitrate sprays of 80.7 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–710 · show in text ↑
e3

“Non‐treated fruits had 4.6 spots, 410 pg/g of peel Ca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–337 · show in text ↑
e0

“but increased spots to 7.9”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate sprays increased fruit Ca in apples to 520.

Treatment
Calcium nitrate sprayse4
Outcome
fruit Cae0
Direction
increasede0
Value
520e0
Comparator
Non‐treated fruitse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“The influence of calcium and boron sprays on corking and nutrition of apples (malus domesticaborkh)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e4

“Calcium nitrate sprays of 80.7 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–710 · show in text ↑
e3

“Non‐treated fruits had 4.6 spots, 410 pg/g of peel Ca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–337 · show in text ↑
e0

“increased fruit Ca to 520”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–750 · show in text ↑

calcium nitrate · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 25 positive, 7 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 100 positive, 16 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.