Paper · 1993 · Physiologia Plantarum

Inhibition of mugineic acid‐ferric complex uptake in barley by copper, zinc and cobalt

Jian Feng Ma; Kyosuke Nomoto

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
46
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The interfering effects of copper, zinc, and cobalt on the uptake of mugineic acid‐ferric complex were studied in barley ( Hordeum vulgare , cv. Minorimugi) grown in nutrient solution. Short‐term uptake experiments of 3 h were performed utilizing both ionic and mugineic acid‐complex forms of each metal at two different concentrations. Copper was most effective in decreasing iron uptake when added in an ionic form at either concentration. The inhibition order at higher concentrations followed Cu(II) > Zn(II) ≥ Co(II), Co(III), which is consistent with the stability constants of these metal complexes with mugineic acid. The displacement of iron from its mugineic acid complex by these metals is suggested as a probable explanation for the decreased iron uptake. The inhibitory effect of metal complexes with mugineic acid on iron uptake was only found in cases with higher concentrations of Cu(II) and Zn(II) complexes. Deformation of the specific iron transport system in the plasma membrane due to their adsorption may be responsible for this effect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ionic copper most effectively decreased iron uptake at either concentration.

Treatment
Coppere0
Outcome
iron uptakee0
Direction
decreasinge0
Qualifier
in an ionic form at either concentratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Copper was most effective in decreasing iron uptake when added in an ionic form at either concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–441 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At higher concentrations, inhibition ranked Cu(II) above Zn(II), which was at least as high as Co(II) and Co(III).

Outcome
inhibition ordere0
Qualifier
higher concentrationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibition order at higher concentrations followed Cu(II) > Zn(II) ≥ Co(II), Co(III)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 442–530 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Displacement of iron from its mugineic acid complex was suggested to explain decreased iron uptake.

Compound
mugineic acid complexe0
Outcome
decreased iron uptakee0
Qualifier
suggested as a probable explanatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The displacement of iron from its mugineic acid complex by these metals is suggested as a probable explanation for the decreased iron uptake.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 626–767 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only higher concentrations of Cu(II) and Zn(II) mugineic acid complexes inhibited iron uptake.

Treatment
Cu(II) and Zn(II) complexese0
Outcome
iron uptakee0
Direction
inhibitorye0
Qualifier
higher concentrationse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibitory effect of metal complexes with mugineic acid on iron uptake was only found in cases with higher concentrations of Cu(II) and Zn(II) complexes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–925 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adsorption-related deformation of an iron transport system was proposed to explain the inhibitory effect.

Outcome
this effecte0
Qualifier
Deformation of the specific iron transport system in the plasma membrane due to their adsorptione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Deformation of the specific iron transport system in the plasma membrane due to their adsorption may be responsible for this effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–59 · show in text ↑

copper atom · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 25 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.