Paper · 1993 · Arid Land Research and Management

Nitrogen uptake in wheat as influenced by the presence of nickel

D. J. Dahiya; J. P. Singh; Vinod Kumar

9
claims
14
verbatim quotes
6
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Presence of Ni may influence the absorption and utilization of N by plants. A screen‐house experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of N concentrations (0, 30, 60, and 120 mg N kg‐1 soil) as influenced by Ni concentrations (0, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, and 20 mg Ni kg‐1 soil) on dry matter (DM) of wheat and tissue concentration and uptake of N and Ni. Application of N to soil increased the DM yield of wheat and concentration and uptake of N significantly (P ≤ 0.01) at all concentrations of Ni. The values of these parameters increased significantly (P ≤ 0.01) with the added Ni up to 10 mg kg‐1 soil but decreased with the further application of Ni to soil. The magnitude of the increase or decrease in these parameters was higher in the presence than in the absence of applied N. Nickel concentration in wheat tissue and uptake of Ni by wheat plants increased markedly (P ≤ 0.07) with the increasing concentrations of Ni in soil. A low amount of Ni was required for N absorption in plants as evidenced by the increase in concentration and uptake of N in wheat plants grown on soil treated with low concentrations of Ni. Nitrogen additions to soil showed a depressive effect on Ni concentration in wheat tissue. This decrease in tissue Ni concentration was primarily due to a growth response to applied N in soil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil N increased wheat dry matter yield significantly at all Ni levels.

Treatment
Application of N to soile0
Outcome
DM yield of wheate0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at all concentrations of Nie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of N to soil increased the DM yield of wheat and concentration and uptake of N significantly (P ≤ 0.01) at all concentrations of Ni”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil N significantly increased wheat N concentration and uptake at all Ni levels.

Treatment
Application of N to soile0
Outcome
concentration and uptake of Ne0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at all concentrations of Nie0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of N to soil increased the DM yield of wheat and concentration and uptake of N significantly (P ≤ 0.01) at all concentrations of Ni”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–498 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Added Ni up to 10 mg kg‐1 soil significantly increased dry matter yield and N concentration and uptake.

Treatment
added Ni up to 10 mg kg‐1 soile0
Outcome
these parameterse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The values of these parameters increased significantly (P ≤ 0.01) with the added Ni up to 10 mg kg‐1 soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–605 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Further soil Ni reduced these parameters.

Treatment
further application of Ni to soile0
Outcome
these parameterse1
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but decreased with the further application of Ni to soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–662 · show in text ↑
e1

“The values of these parameters increased significantly (P ≤ 0.01) with the added Ni up to 10 mg kg‐1 soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 500–605 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Ni-associated changes were greater with N application.

Treatment
applied Ne0
Outcome
magnitude of the increase or decreasee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
absence of applied Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The magnitude of the increase or decrease in these parameters was higher in the presence than in the absence of applied N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue Ni concentration and Ni uptake rose with increasing soil Ni.

Treatment
increasing concentrations of Ni in soile0
Outcome
Nickel concentration in wheat tissue and uptake of Ni by wheat plantse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nickel concentration in wheat tissue and uptake of Ni by wheat plants increased markedly (P ≤ 0.07) with the increasing concentrations of Ni in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–935 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low Ni increased N concentration and uptake in wheat.

Treatment
low concentrations of Nie0
Outcome
concentration and uptake of Ne0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increase in concentration and uptake of N in wheat plants grown on soil treated with low concentrations of Ni”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil N additions reduced tissue Ni concentration.

Treatment
Nitrogen additions to soile0
Outcome
Ni concentration in wheat tissuee0
Direction
depressivee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen additions to soil showed a depressive effect on Ni concentration in wheat tissue”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1216 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tissue Ni decrease was attributed primarily to a growth response to N.

Treatment
applied N in soile0
Outcome
decrease in tissue Ni concentratione0
Qualifier
growth responsee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This decrease in tissue Ni concentration was primarily due to a growth response to applied N in soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1318 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 19–24 · show in text ↑

nickel atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 6 positive, 5 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

479 papers: 410 positive, 69 negative or no effect

409 papers in the same direction as this paper · 64 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

475 papers more in this group

See all 479 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

425 papers in the same direction as this paper · 116 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.