Paper · 2004 · Physiologia Plantarum

Reversible cellular and metabolic changes induced by dehydration in desiccation‐tolerant wheat seedling shoots

Françoise Corbineau; Patricia Berjak; Norman Pammenter; et al.

18
claims
35
verbatim quotes
29
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Wheat seedlings obtained after 2 or 3 days of seed germination in darkness at 20°C (i.e. with a 0.5–0.7 cm long coleoptile) were still viable after drying in darkness in ambient conditions which reduced the shoot moisture content to about 0.30 g H 2 O g −1 dry mass (DM). Coleoptile and primary leaf growth resumed upon rehydration, but primary roots died and new roots regenerated. In the present work we have investigated whether desiccation tolerance of the shoot (coleoptile and primary leaf combined) was related to some reversible cellular or metabolic changes induced by dehydration. Non‐dehydrated shoots were high in moisture content (4.0–5.0 g H 2 O g −1 DM) and exhibited an active metabolism as indicated by a high energy charge (EC = 0.85) and cells with well developed mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, polysomes and Golgi bodies. Dehydration induced changes in cell membrane properties since it reduced in vivo capacity of the shoot to convert 1‐aminocyclopropane 1‐carboxylic acid (ACC) to ethylene (i.e. ACC oxidase activity). This effect was already observed at 4–5 h of dehydration, namely when shoot moisture content dropped down below about 3.0 g H 2 O g −1 DM, and ACC‐dependent ethylene production became almost nil when shoot moisture content reached 1.0 g H 2 O g −1 DM. Dehydration also resulted in decreases in ATP and non‐adenylic triphosphate nucleotide (NTP) contents down to 1–2% of their initial values, and in EC value to 0.20. Concomitant with water loss, sucrose content of the shoot increased and was maximal (about 330 mg g −1 DM, namely three‐fold that of non‐dehydrated organs) after 2 days of drying. Upon rehydration, shoots regained their original moisture content within 3 days, during which they progressively recovered apparent normal metabolism. Reversal of extensive dehydration‐associated cell wall folding occurred between 2 and 3 days of rehydration, when the ultrastructure of coleoptile and primary leaf cells also provided evidence of intensive autophagic activity, indicative of the removal of damaged cell components. Concomitantly, apparently undamaged organelles and endomembranes persisted in the cytoplasm. Restoration of 60–70% of ACC oxidase activity and 80–90% of EC value occurred within 48 and 18 h, respectively. However, the values of the ATP/ADP and NTP/ATP ratios remained lower than in control non‐dehydrated shoots, indicating that not all metabolic deterioration induced by dehydration was completely repaired. Differences in relationships between shoot moisture content and ACC‐oxidase activity or energy metabolism during dehydration and upon rehydration, and cell ultrastruture analyses suggest that desiccation tolerance of wheat seedling shoot is related to mechanisms involved in the maintenance of cell structure during water loss and the cell capacity to repair the dehydration damage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Young wheat seedlings remained viable after drying reduced shoot moisture to about 0.30 g H 2 O g −1 dry mass.

Treatment
drying in darkness in ambient conditionse0
Outcome
still viablee0
Value
about 0.30 g H 2 O g −1 dry mass (DM)e0
Qualifier
after 2 or 3 days of seed germination in darkness at 20°Ce0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Wheat seedlings obtained after 2 or 3 days of seed germination in darkness at 20°C (i.e. with a 0.5–0.7 cm long coleoptile) were still viable after drying in darkness in ambient conditions which reduced the shoot moisture content to about 0.30 g H 2 O g −1 dry mass (DM).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat coleoptile and primary leaf growth resumed on rehydration.

Treatment
rehydratione0
Outcome
Coleoptile and primary leaf growth resumede0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Coleoptile and primary leaf growth resumed upon rehydration, but primary roots died and new roots regenerated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 272–382 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat primary roots died and new roots regenerated.

Outcome
primary roots died and new roots regeneratede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“primary roots died and new roots regenerated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–382 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-dehydrated wheat shoots had moisture content of 4.0–5.0 g H 2 O g −1 DM.

Outcome
moisture contente0
Direction
highe0
Value
4.0–5.0 g H 2 O g −1 DMe0
Qualifier
Non‐dehydratede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Non‐dehydrated shoots were high in moisture content (4.0–5.0 g H 2 O g −1 DM) and exhibited an active metabolism as indicated by a high energy charge (EC = 0.85) and cells with well developed mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, polysomes and Golgi bodies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–847 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Non-dehydrated wheat shoots had active metabolism with EC of 0.85 and well-developed organelles.

Outcome
energy chargee0
Direction
highe0
Value
0.85e0
Qualifier
cells with well developed mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, polysomes and Golgi bodiese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Non‐dehydrated shoots were high in moisture content (4.0–5.0 g H 2 O g −1 DM) and exhibited an active metabolism as indicated by a high energy charge (EC = 0.85) and cells with well developed mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, polysomes and Golgi bodies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–847 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dehydration reduced wheat shoot ACC oxidase activity, already evident after 4–5 hours below about 3.0 g H 2 O g −1 DM moisture.

Treatment
Dehydratione0
Outcome
ACC oxidase activitye0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
at 4–5 h of dehydration, namely when shoot moisture content dropped down below about 3.0 g H 2 O g −1 DMe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dehydration induced changes in cell membrane properties since it reduced in vivo capacity of the shoot to convert 1‐aminocyclopropane 1‐carboxylic acid (ACC) to ethylene (i.e. ACC oxidase activity).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 848–1046 · show in text ↑
e1

“This effect was already observed at 4–5 h of dehydration, namely when shoot moisture content dropped down below about 3.0 g H 2 O g −1 DM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1184 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat ACC-dependent ethylene production became almost nil at shoot moisture of 1.0 g H 2 O g −1 DM.

Outcome
ACC‐dependent ethylene productione0
Direction
became almost nile0
Qualifier
when shoot moisture content reached 1.0 g H 2 O g −1 DMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“ACC‐dependent ethylene production became almost nil when shoot moisture content reached 1.0 g H 2 O g −1 DM.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1298 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dehydration decreased wheat ATP and NTP contents to 1–2% of initial values.

Treatment
Dehydratione0
Outcome
ATP and non‐adenylic triphosphate nucleotide (NTP) contentse0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
1–2%e0
Comparator
initial valuese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dehydration also resulted in decreases in ATP and non‐adenylic triphosphate nucleotide (NTP) contents down to 1–2% of their initial values, and in EC value to 0.20.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dehydration decreased wheat EC to 0.20.

Treatment
Dehydratione0
Outcome
EC valuee0
Direction
decreasese0
Value
0.20e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Dehydration also resulted in decreases in ATP and non‐adenylic triphosphate nucleotide (NTP) contents down to 1–2% of their initial values, and in EC value to 0.20.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1299–1463 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat shoot sucrose increased to a maximum of about 330 mg g −1 DM after two days of drying, three times non-dehydrated levels.

Treatment
dryinge0
Outcome
sucrose content of the shoote0
Direction
increasede0
Value
about 330 mg g −1 DMe0
Qualifier
after 2 days of dryinge0
Comparator
non‐dehydrated organse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Concomitant with water loss, sucrose content of the shoot increased and was maximal (about 330 mg g −1 DM, namely three‐fold that of non‐dehydrated organs) after 2 days of drying.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1464–1643 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat shoots regained original moisture content within three days of rehydration and progressively recovered apparently normal metabolism.

Treatment
rehydratione0
Outcome
original moisture contente0
Direction
regainede0
Qualifier
within 3 days, during which they progressively recovered apparent normal metabolisme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Upon rehydration, shoots regained their original moisture content within 3 days, during which they progressively recovered apparent normal metabolism.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1644–1794 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat cell-wall folding reversed between two and three days of rehydration.

Treatment
rehydratione0
Outcome
Reversal of extensive dehydration‐associated cell wall foldinge0
Qualifier
between 2 and 3 dayse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Reversal of extensive dehydration‐associated cell wall folding occurred between 2 and 3 days of rehydration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1795–1902 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rehydrating wheat coleoptile and primary leaf cells showed intensive autophagic activity indicative of damaged-component removal.

Organ / stage
coleoptile and primary leaf cellse0
Outcome
intensive autophagic activitye0
Qualifier
indicative of the removal of damaged cell componentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“the ultrastructure of coleoptile and primary leaf cells also provided evidence of intensive autophagic activity, indicative of the removal of damaged cell components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1909–2075 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apparently undamaged organelles and endomembranes persisted in wheat cytoplasm during recovery.

Outcome
apparently undamaged organelles and endomembranes persisted in the cytoplasme0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Concomitantly, apparently undamaged organelles and endomembranes persisted in the cytoplasm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2076–2168 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat restored 60–70% of ACC oxidase activity within 48 hours.

Outcome
ACC oxidase activitye0
Direction
Restoratione0
Value
60–70%e0
Qualifier
48e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Restoration of 60–70% of ACC oxidase activity and 80–90% of EC value occurred within 48 and 18 h, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2169–2280 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat restored 80–90% of EC value within 18 hours.

Outcome
EC valuee0
Direction
Restoratione0
Value
80–90%e0
Qualifier
18 he0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“Restoration of 60–70% of ACC oxidase activity and 80–90% of EC value occurred within 48 and 18 h, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2169–2280 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat ATP/ADP and NTP/ATP ratios remained below non-dehydrated controls, indicating incomplete metabolic repair.

Outcome
ATP/ADP and NTP/ATP ratiose0
Direction
remained lowere0
Qualifier
not all metabolic deterioration induced by dehydration was completely repairede0
Comparator
control non‐dehydrated shootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–94 · show in text ↑
e0

“However, the values of the ATP/ADP and NTP/ATP ratios remained lower than in control non‐dehydrated shoots, indicating that not all metabolic deterioration induced by dehydration was completely repaired.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2281–2484 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat shoot desiccation tolerance was suggested to involve maintaining cell structure during water loss and repairing dehydration damage.

Outcome
desiccation tolerancee0
Qualifier
maintenance of cell structure during water loss and the cell capacity to repair the dehydration damagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suggest that desiccation tolerance of wheat seedling shoot is related to mechanisms involved in the maintenance of cell structure during water loss and the cell capacity to repair the dehydration damage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2664–2867 · show in text ↑

rewatering · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

drought · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 8 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

drought · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

125 papers: 56 positive, 69 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

121 papers more in this group

See all 125 papers →

drought · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

rewatering · cytology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.