Paper · 2010 · Nigeria Agricultural Journal

Influence of two glomus species on the fertilizer efficiency of sokoto phosphate rock in soybean production and the residual soil

O.A Babalola; M.O Atayese; I.B Akintade

19
claims
38
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A screenhouse experiment was carried out at the University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, to investigate the influence of two species of Glomus (G. mosseae and G. deserticola) on the fertilizer efficiency of Sokoto phosphate rock in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil. The experiment was arranged in randomized block design with four replicates. The treatments consisted of sole inoculations of G. mosseae and G. deserticola and their combinations with phosphate rock (PR), sole application of PR, SSP and a no-inoculation, no-fertilizer control. Results obtained revealed that the percent colonization rate of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMF) was significantly higher in treatments with combinations of PR and Glomus than the sole AMF treatments and least in non mycorrhizal fungi treatments at 3 and 9 Weeks after sowing (WAS). Also, sole inoculation of G. deserticola caused significantly higher P uptake than treatments with combination of PR and Glomus as well as SSP application and least in control, N uptake was however similar in all the treatments. Consequently, growth parameters such as, plant height, numbers of leaves and branches, canopy diameter as well as leaf area significantly increased between 2-6WAS due to inoculation of G. mosseae or G. deserticola and their combinations with PR. Furthermore, shoot biomass significantly increased at 3, 6 and 9 WAS with G mosseae and PR combination similarly, root biomass significantly increased at 3 WAS due to application of PR and at 6 and 9 WAS, combination of G. deserticola and PR increased root biomass. Nodule weight increased significantly with combinations of PR with G. deserticola at 6, 8 and 9 WAS and PR with G. mosseae at 9 WAS while nodule number increased significantly with combination of PR and the two species of Glomus at 6, 8 and 9WAS. Sole inoculation of G. deserticola and SSP caused the plants to flower significantly earlier than other treatments and yield was significantly higher in sole G. mosseae and PR treatments than in SSP and control. At the end of soybean cropping, treatments with PR/Glomus combination and sole G. mosseae produced significantly higher N in the residual soil while sole application ofPRproduced the least. Application of SSPgave the highestP, whilePRas well as control gave the least and soil organic matter was highest with sole inoculation of G. deserticola and least inPRapplication.Keywords: Phosphate Rock, Glomus mosseae, Glomus deserticola, soybean, Residual soil

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Colonization by arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi was significantly higher with combinations of phosphate rock and Glomus than with sole AMF treatments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
combinations of PR and Glomuse1
Interactor
arbuscular mycorrhiza fungie1symbiont
Outcome
percent colonization rate of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMF)e1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
3 and 9 Weeks after sowing (WAS)e1
Comparator
sole AMF treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e1

“percent colonization rate of arbuscular mycorrhiza fungi (AMF) was significantly higher in treatments with combinations of PR and Glomus than the sole AMF treatments and least in non mycorrhizal fungi treatments at 3 and 9 Weeks after sowing (WAS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 607–854 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole inoculation with G. deserticola significantly increased soybean P uptake relative to combinations of phosphate rock and Glomus.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
sole inoculation of G. deserticolae2
Interactor
G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae2symbiont
Outcome
P uptakee2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
treatments with combination of PR and Glomuse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e2

“sole inoculation of G. deserticola caused significantly higher P uptake than treatments with combination of PR and Glomus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 862–983 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N uptake by soybean was similar in all treatments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Outcome
N uptakee3
Qualifier
similar in all the treatmentse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e3

“N uptake was however similar in all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1083 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with G. mosseae or G. deserticola, alone or with phosphate rock, significantly increased plant height and the numbers of leaves and branches between 2 and 6 weeks.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
inoculation of G. mosseae or G. deserticola and their combinations with PRe4
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee4symbiont
Second interactor
G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae4symbiont
Outcome
plant height, numbers of leaves and branchese4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
between 2-6WASe4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e4

“growth parameters such as, plant height, numbers of leaves and branches, canopy diameter as well as leaf area significantly increased between 2-6WAS due to inoculation of G. mosseae or G. deserticola and their combinations with PR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with G. mosseae or G. deserticola, alone or with phosphate rock, significantly increased canopy diameter and leaf area between 2 and 6 weeks.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
inoculation of G. mosseae or G. deserticola and their combinations with PRe4
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee4symbiont
Second interactor
G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae4symbiont
Outcome
canopy diameter as well as leaf areae4
Direction
increasede4
Qualifier
between 2-6WASe4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e4

“growth parameters such as, plant height, numbers of leaves and branches, canopy diameter as well as leaf area significantly increased between 2-6WAS due to inoculation of G. mosseae or G. deserticola and their combinations with PR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1099–1329 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot biomass significantly increased with G. mosseae and phosphate rock combination at 3, 6 and 9 weeks.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
G mosseae and PR combinatione5
Interactor
G mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee5symbiont
Outcome
shoot biomasse5
Direction
increasede5
Qualifier
at 3, 6 and 9 WASe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e5

“shoot biomass significantly increased at 3, 6 and 9 WAS with G mosseae and PR combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1433 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root biomass significantly increased at 3 weeks with phosphate rock application.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
application of PRe6
Outcome
root biomasse6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
at 3 WASe6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e6

“root biomass significantly increased at 3 WAS due to application of PR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1515 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root biomass increased at 6 and 9 weeks with G. deserticola and phosphate rock combination.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
combination of G. deserticola and PRe7
Interactor
G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae7symbiont
Outcome
root biomasse7
Direction
increasede7
Qualifier
at 6 and 9 WASe7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e7

“at 6 and 9 WAS, combination of G. deserticola and PR increased root biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1520–1595 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule weight increased with G. deserticola and phosphate rock combinations at 6, 8 and 9 weeks.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
combinations of PR with G. deserticolae1
Interactor
G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae1symbiont
Outcome
Nodule weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
at 6, 8 and 9 WASe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nodule weight increased significantly with combinations of PR with G. deserticola at 6, 8 and 9 WAS and PR with G. mosseae at 9 WAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule weight increased with G. mosseae and phosphate rock at 9 weeks.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
PR with G. mosseaee1
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
Outcome
Nodule weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
at 9 WASe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nodule weight increased significantly with combinations of PR with G. deserticola at 6, 8 and 9 WAS and PR with G. mosseae at 9 WAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1597–1728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nodule number increased with phosphate rock combined with either Glomus species at 6, 8 and 9 weeks.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
combination of PR and the two species of Glomuse1
Interactor
GlomusGlomuse1symbiont
Outcome
nodule numbere1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
at 6, 8 and 9WASe1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glomus
Glomus · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e1

“nodule number increased significantly with combination of PR and the two species of Glomus at 6, 8 and 9WAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1735–1842 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole inoculation with G. deserticola caused soybean to flower significantly earlier than other treatments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
Sole inoculation of G. deserticolae1
Interactor
G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae1symbiont
Outcome
to flowere1
Direction
earliere1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sole inoculation of G. deserticola and SSP caused the plants to flower significantly earlier than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1844–1958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SSP caused soybean to flower significantly earlier than other treatments.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
SSPe1
Outcome
to flowere1
Direction
earliere1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sole inoculation of G. deserticola and SSP caused the plants to flower significantly earlier than other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1844–1958 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was significantly higher with sole G. mosseae and phosphate rock treatments than with SSP and control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
sole G. mosseae and PR treatmentse1
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
SSP and controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e1

“yield was significantly higher in sole G. mosseae and PR treatments than in SSP and control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1963–2054 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments combining phosphate rock with Glomus significantly increased residual soil N.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
PR/Glomus combinatione1
Interactor
GlomusGlomuse1symbiont
Outcome
N in the residual soile1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Glomus
Glomus · InteractorJerry Cooper · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatments with PR/Glomus combination and sole G. mosseae produced significantly higher N in the residual soil while sole application ofPRproduced the least”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2088–2244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole G. mosseae significantly increased residual soil N.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
sole G. mosseaee1
Interactor
G. mosseaeFunneliformis mosseaee1symbiont
Outcome
N in the residual soile1
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Funneliformis mosseae
Funneliformis mosseae · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySamson90 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatments with PR/Glomus combination and sole G. mosseae produced significantly higher N in the residual soil while sole application ofPRproduced the least”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2088–2244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole application of phosphate rock produced the least residual soil N.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
sole application ofPRe1
Outcome
N in the residual soile1
Direction
leaste1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatments with PR/Glomus combination and sole G. mosseae produced significantly higher N in the residual soil while sole application ofPRproduced the least”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2088–2244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of SSP gave the highest residual soil P, higher than PR and control.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
SSPe1
Outcome
Pe1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
PRas well as controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of SSPgave the highestP, whilePRas well as control gave the least”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2246–2323 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil organic matter was highest with sole inoculation of G. deserticola and least with phosphate rock application.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe0
Treatment
sole inoculation of G. deserticolae1
Interactor
G. deserticolaSeptoglomus deserticolae1symbiont
Outcome
soil organic mattere1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
PRapplicatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in promoting soybean production and the impact on the residual soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 225–292 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil organic matter was highest with sole inoculation of G. deserticola and least inPRapplication”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2328–2425 · show in text ↑

Glomus · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Glomus · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Septoglomus deserticola · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Funneliformis mosseae · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Funneliformis mosseae · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Funneliformis mosseae · growth · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

phosphorus · disease · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 14 positive, 8 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

phosphorus · symbiosis · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 71 positive, 10 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.