Paper · 2012 · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Effects of Foliar Iron Application on Iron Concentration in Polished Rice Grain and Its Bioavailability

Yanyan Wei; M. J. I. Shohag; Xiaoe Yang; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
85
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Iron (Fe) deficiency in humans caused by inadequate dietary intake is a global nutritional problem. A glass house pot experiment was conducted to evaluate the effect of foliar FeSO₄ containing applications on concentrations of Fe, Zn, and Fe bioavailability in polished rice among five rice cultivars. The results showed that foliar application of FeSO₄, FeSO₄, plus nicotianamine (NA), and FeSO₄ plus NA with ZnSO₄ increased the grain Fe concentration by 16.97%, 29.9%, and 27.08%, respectively. The grain Fe bioavailability also increased by foliar application of FeSO₄, FeSO₄ plus NA, and FeSO₄ plus NA with ZnSO₄; these represent increases of 12.63%, 20.86%, and 18.75%, respectively. Foliar FeSO₄ containing applications improved the Fe bioavailability and might be attributed to the reduction of phytic acid and the increase of Fe concentration in polished rice. Addition of ZnSO₄ to foliar Fe application increased both Fe and Zn content without altering Fe content and bioavailability. In addition, the cultivar difference in Fe and Zn concentration was observed and may be due to the genetic control of leaf absorption and seed deposition of foliar application. Furthermore, the cultivar difference in Fe bioavailability observed might be attributed to the variation of grain Fe, phytic acid, and total phenolics contents among the five rice cultivars. The results suggested that foliar FeSO₄ containing applications represent a promising agricultural approach to reduce Fe deficiency in countries where polished rice is extensively consumed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar FeSO₄ increased grain Fe concentration by 16.97%.

Treatment
FeSO₄e0
Outcome
grain Fe concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16.97%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of FeSO₄, FeSO₄, plus nicotianamine (NA), and FeSO₄ plus NA with ZnSO₄ increased the grain Fe concentration by 16.97%, 29.9%, and 27.08%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar FeSO₄ plus nicotianamine increased grain Fe concentration by 29.9%.

Treatment
FeSO₄, plus nicotianamine (NA)e0
Outcome
grain Fe concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
29.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of FeSO₄, FeSO₄, plus nicotianamine (NA), and FeSO₄ plus NA with ZnSO₄ increased the grain Fe concentration by 16.97%, 29.9%, and 27.08%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar FeSO₄ plus nicotianamine and ZnSO₄ increased grain Fe concentration by 27.08%.

Treatment
FeSO₄ plus NA with ZnSO₄e0
Outcome
grain Fe concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.08%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“FeSO₄ plus NA with ZnSO₄ increased the grain Fe concentration by 16.97%, 29.9%, and 27.08%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar FeSO₄ increased grain Fe bioavailability by 12.63%.

Treatment
FeSO₄e0
Outcome
grain Fe bioavailabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.63%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain Fe bioavailability also increased by foliar application of FeSO₄, FeSO₄ plus NA, and FeSO₄ plus NA with ZnSO₄; these represent increases of 12.63%, 20.86%, and 18.75%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar FeSO₄ plus NA increased grain Fe bioavailability by 20.86%.

Treatment
FeSO₄ plus NAe0
Outcome
grain Fe bioavailabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.86%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain Fe bioavailability also increased by foliar application of FeSO₄, FeSO₄ plus NA, and FeSO₄ plus NA with ZnSO₄; these represent increases of 12.63%, 20.86%, and 18.75%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar FeSO₄ plus NA and ZnSO₄ increased grain Fe bioavailability by 18.75%.

Treatment
FeSO₄ plus NA with ZnSO₄e0
Outcome
grain Fe bioavailabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
18.75%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain Fe bioavailability also increased by foliar application of FeSO₄, FeSO₄ plus NA, and FeSO₄ plus NA with ZnSO₄; these represent increases of 12.63%, 20.86%, and 18.75%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 497–687 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar FeSO₄ applications may improve bioavailability through reduced phytic acid and increased polished-grain Fe.

Treatment
Foliar FeSO₄ containing applicationse0
Outcome
Fe bioavailabilitye0
Qualifier
reduction of phytic acid and the increase of Fe concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar FeSO₄ containing applications improved the Fe bioavailability and might be attributed to the reduction of phytic acid and the increase of Fe concentration in polished rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding ZnSO₄ to foliar Fe increased grain Zn content.

Treatment
Addition of ZnSO₄ to foliar Fe applicatione0
Outcome
Zn contente0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
foliar Fe applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of ZnSO₄ to foliar Fe application increased both Fe and Zn content without altering Fe content and bioavailability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding ZnSO₄ to foliar Fe did not alter Fe bioavailability.

Treatment
Addition of ZnSO₄ to foliar Fe applicatione0
Outcome
Fe content and bioavailabilitye0
Direction
without alteringe0
Comparator
foliar Fe applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of ZnSO₄ to foliar Fe application increased both Fe and Zn content without altering Fe content and bioavailability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed in grain Fe and Zn concentrations.

Outcome
cultivar difference in Fe and Zn concentratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cultivar difference in Fe and Zn concentration was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1070 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed in Fe bioavailability.

Outcome
cultivar difference in Fe bioavailabilitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the cultivar difference in Fe bioavailability observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1184–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar differences in Fe and Zn concentration may reflect genetic control of leaf absorption and seed deposition.

Outcome
leaf absorption and seed depositione0
Qualifier
genetic controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“may be due to the genetic control of leaf absorption and seed deposition of foliar application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differences in grain Fe, phytic acid and phenolics may explain cultivar variation in Fe bioavailability.

Outcome
Fe bioavailabilitye0
Qualifier
variation of grain Fe, phytic acid, and total phenolics contentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cultivar difference in Fe bioavailability observed might be attributed to the variation of grain Fe, phytic acid, and total phenolics contents among the five rice cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1360 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar FeSO₄ applications were proposed to address iron deficiency where polished rice is widely consumed.

Outcome
foliar FeSO₄ containing applicationse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar FeSO₄ containing applications represent a promising agricultural approach to reduce Fe deficiency in countries where polished rice is extensively consumed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1389–1550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–73 · show in text ↑

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 60 positive, 5 negative or no effect

59 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

iron atom · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 64 positive, 25 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

nicotianamine · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 212 positive, 10 negative or no effect

211 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.